Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials

[SolomonVII]

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/


As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.

Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.

 

[redleghunter]

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-directed-her-maid-to-print-out-classified-materials/


As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.

In fact, Marina Santos was called on so frequently to receive e-mails that she may hold the secrets to E-mailgate — if only the FBI and Congress would subpoena her and the equipment she used.

Clinton entrusted far more than the care of her DC residence, known as Whitehaven, to Santos. She expected the Filipino immigrant to handle state secrets, further opening the Democratic presidential nominee to criticism that she played fast and loose with national security.

Mopgate.

Sigh....another unauthorized computer with government property on it.

Vernon Jordan knows how to recommend well. Lol.

 

[Hank77]

Oh my!! Did you see the scandal at the bottom of that article's page. H.W. has a very young, Asian mistress, and at his age!!

 

[SolomonVII]

Mopgate.

Sigh....another unauthorized computer with government property on it.

Vernon Jordan knows how to recommend well. Lol.

This is a story that will dog HRC for as long as she is president.
The story may face with a loss, but the life of the scandal does not ride on that or that latest pronouncement by J Comey.

For me, Petreaus was a heroic figure. He was the kind of military genius that was able to give ordinary Iraqis a fighting chance for civil society.
And yet, I totally understood how the hero that HRC had once mocked as Petreaus Betray Us for God knows what reason, was found guilty for not treating confidential documents with the level of security that they needed to be. Even if his girlfriend had a certain level of security clearance, he himself recognized that he crossed a line, and his career was ruined, and rightfully so.
Story after story reveals how Hillary Clinton treated government documents with careless disregard.
And yet the same Democratic supporters who joined her taunts on Petreaus see fit to glorify her with the highest office of the land.

Go figure. When Dennis Prager comments that for the left, truth is not a value;power is, it is this kind of duplicity that really drives home that point for me.

 

[FreeinChrist]

http://mediamatters.org/research/20...ns-emails-botch-classification-history/214345

The New York Post published a front page report alleging that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton “routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents -- including ones containing classified information,” but ignored the fact the emails in question were classified years after the fact. The report cited only two classified emails, both of which were retroactively classified at the lowest level of classification, a practice which is consistent with past State Department actions. Additionally, in both confidential emails Clinton did not request that her maid print the emails. The author of the report has a history of inaccurate reporting when it comes to Clinton’s emails.
​

nothing exciting here.....