I have wondered about this, too. I think we get into some strange territory if we try to locate an actual recipient of the "payment."
If we say it was God, then God pays the price to God?
If we say Satan, then God paid Satan off?
If we loosen our grip on trying to locate a literal recipient, then perhaps we can say Christ "paid the price" needed to free us from death and destruction. He gave his life as a "payment" to secure life for us. There is no actual recipient.
God set up the conditions needed for life to flourish in the divine presence. We have not met those conditions (sin) and, as things stand, cannot persist forever in the divine presence without some change occurring in us. The Son takes our nature upon himself (incarnation), meets the conditions for persisting life (obedience), endures the consequences of human sin and evil (death), overcomes them (resurrection), and returns to the divine presence taking humanity with him (ascension), thus opening the path for us to follow. In short, he gave himself as a ransom for many.
Just my thoughts, don't throw stones at me, lol.
You do good the realize the problem of the kidnapper.
Who is the underserving kidnapper the ransom is paid to, in order to be a true ransoming scenario?
The Bible refers to Jesus’ sacrifice as a literal ransom:
Mark 10:45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to
give his life as a ransom for many.”
1 Timothy 2:6 who
gave himself as a ransom for all people. This has now been witnessed to at the proper time
Heb. 9: 15…now that
he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
We do have the blood specifically mentioned in Revelation 5:9 They sing a new song: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals,
for you were slaughtered and by your blood you ransomed for God saints from every tribe and language and people and nation;
Atonement is a huge misunderstood topic which all the theories do a poor job explaining, look at just one aspect they do not address:
Are we in agreement:
1. Jesus life is the unbelievable huge ransom payment?
2. The ransom payment was made to set children free to go to the Kingdom and be with the Father?
3. Deity (Jesus and God both) made this unbelievable huge payment?
4. All these fit perfectly a ransom scenario?
5. The scripture is not describing Jesus’ cruel torturous death on the cross as being like a ransom payment, but as being a ransom payment?
6. This was all done for “many” and “God’s saints” in some way and in other ways for “all” people?
You may have a problem with “6”, but I am just quoting scripture.
If it is not a kidnapping then it is no “ransoming”, but the Bible tells us there is a ransom payment at least being offered and definitely made for “many” and “God’s saints”.
Peter even help us out more by contrasting the unbelievable huge payment of Christ to just a payment of silver and gold. Who might take silver and gold, so it can be a good analogy for Peter? 1 Peter 1:18
You know that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your ancestors, not with perishable things like silver or gold,
A kidnapper holds back the parent’s children awaiting an acceptable ransom payment, so who do you blame for keeping children out of the Kingdom, since we sure do not want to blame ourselves?
The Kidnapper cannot be God since He is not an undeserving criminal kidnapper holding His own children back.
Also the Kidnapper would not be satan since God has the power to take without paying anything from satan. There is no cosmic Law saying you have got to pay the kidnapper and it would be wrong to do, satan is fully undeserving.
So who is the kidnapper?
When you go up to a nonbelieving sinner what are you trying to get him/her to accept: A doctrine, a denomination, a book, a theology, or something else. NO, you want the nonbeliever to accept “Jesus Christ and Him Crucified” and if he does a child of God is released to enter the Kingdom and be with God, but if the sinner rejects “Jesus Christ and Him crucifies” a child is kept out of the Kingdom.
Does this not sound very much like a kidnapping scenario with a ransom being offered?
“Jesus Christ and Him crucified” is described in scripture as the ransom payment?
Would the sinner holding a child of God out of the Kingdom of God describe a kidnapper?
“Jesus Christ and Him crucified” is a huge sacrificial payment, like you find with children being ransomed?