CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVE

[katsung47]

CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER
08/27/2018 Richard Pollock | Reporter

A Chinese-owned company penetrated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to sources briefed on the matter.

The company inserted code that forwarded copies of Clinton’s emails to the Chinese company in real time.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General warned of the problem, but the FBI subsequently failed to act, Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said during a July hearing.

A Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails, two sources briefed on the matter told The Daily Caller News Foundation.


https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/

 

[friend of]

Holy gosh. Is she ever a liability. Think of how she could have been blackmailed.

 

[thecolorsblend]

CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER
08/27/2018 Richard Pollock | Reporter

A Chinese-owned company penetrated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to sources briefed on the matter.

The company inserted code that forwarded copies of Clinton’s emails to the Chinese company in real time.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General warned of the problem, but the FBI subsequently failed to act, Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said during a July hearing.

A Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails, two sources briefed on the matter told The Daily Caller News Foundation.


https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/

From the sounds of things, there was no security whatsoever on her mail server. They weren't even using SSL. Anybody could connect to the server and get whatever they want.

That's not "hacking". In fact, depending on which court a suspect winds up in, connecting to an unsecured mail server might not even be considered a crime in the strictest sense of the word.

I don't think most Boomers really understand this technology, what it is, what it does or how it works. To them, I think it's just a Magic Box that shows them email and cat pictures and that's just about all they know or care to know.

If we rule out the possibility of intentional negligence on the secretary's part, the only logical explanation that I can think of is that Hillary Clinton is a conventional Boomer and doesn't understand why her mail server would've needed to be secured.

The really sad thing is that the tools to make it secure are either free or else available for absurdly cheap prices. She could've secured her server using only a small fraction of the money she was paid by banks before 2016.

But she's just a typical Boomer.

Still, in the plus column, the Internet is poised to become a lot less dangerous to be on when the Boomers are too old (or too dead) to use it anymore.

 

[essentialsaltes]

The Intelligence Community Inspector General warned of the problem, but the FBI subsequently failed to act,

The FBI subsequently failed to find any evidence that she was hacked.

 

[katsung47]

Who is the real criminal in Clinton's email hacking case


"CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER
08/27/2018

“On 13 July 2015 and 20 July 2015, I verbally advised you of a Section 811(c) referral from the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community received by the FBI on 06 July 2015. The referral addressed the mishandling of classified information on the personal e-mail account and electronic media of a former high-level us Government official,” according to the FBI memo, which was hand delivered to Yates.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/"

According this information, FBI knew Clinton's email was hacked by foreign nation (possibly China) as early as July 2015. For the sake of US nation's interest, they should let Clinton know this to stop using her private server for her business email. It seems Clinton knew nothing about it. Which may mean the FBI intending to frame her in a trap.

Moreover, Trump - a rival of Clinton in campaign knew this information. So he openly call Russian for a hake. He also threatened Clinton for a "jail". That represents the will of FBI. Fail to protect Nation's secret and leaking information in president campaign. Who is real criminal?

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

The FBI subsequently failed to find any evidence that she was hacked.

They didn't need any. Putting classified information on a private server is illegal whether the server was actually hacked or not.

 

[Yarddog]

CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER
08/27/2018 Richard Pollock | Reporter

A Chinese-owned company penetrated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to sources briefed on the matter.

The company inserted code that forwarded copies of Clinton’s emails to the Chinese company in real time.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General warned of the problem, but the FBI subsequently failed to act, Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said during a July hearing.

A Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails, two sources briefed on the matter told The Daily Caller News Foundation.


https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/

This has been reported by the Daily Caller but have no evidence to support the claim. The IG report stated that there was no evidence, as well.

 

[essentialsaltes]

They didn't need any. Putting classified information on a private server is illegal whether the server was actually hacked or not.

Wooooosh. The goalposts flew quite a distance from the OP. Nevertheless, the FBI didn't think *that* was worth prosecuting either.

 

[Tinker Grey]

They didn't need any. Putting classified information on a private server is illegal whether the server was actually hacked or not.

False. What's is illegal is intentionally giving secrets to people without the clearance to have it.

 

[katsung47]

Obviously, Trump and his mastermind knew or had hacked Clinton's emails already. (US politicians are under surveillance of the Feds(the FBI)). Trump's call for Russian's hacking was a practice to call for a hostile country to frame an US politician's campaign activity. That's a collusion with hostile foreign nation. What Clinton have done? Did she invite Russian to hack her emails? It's like a lady put her money in purse not in Safe for convenience. Her rival knew it and bribed a thief to steal the money. So in this case, Clinton was a victim. The Feds and Trump 's tactic was to frame Clinton in a "treasonous" case. That's how Clinton was blamed "treason" and even was threatened to be put in prison by Trump. But who was real "treason"? Who called for Russians? Why did Russians obeyed the order? It's very obvious. The strange thing is, such a clear thing has been meddling for years. Because this country is ruled by a Deep State which manipulate the government system and media.

 

[katsung47]

They didn't need any. Putting classified information on a private server is illegal whether the server was actually hacked or not.

They call Hillary Clinton criminal in 2016 election, the real criminals are Trump and the Feds (FBI and D.O.J.)

The Feds had a coup in 2016 president election. To escort their candidate Trump to the POTUS, they colluded with Russians to hack the emails of Clinton and accused her of "treason" for using private server. That's a strange logic. The whole case was like a mob group (Trump and his group, the Feds) bribed a thief(Russia) to steal money (emails) from victim (Clinton) who put her money in her purse (private server) instead of a safe. Then say Clinton was a criminal because purse was not a safe place for money.

Clinton might make a mistake to put emails in her private server for convenience but that's out of careless, nothing relate to "treason". On the contrary, Trump openly call on Russia for a "hacking" against his campaign rival. Asking help from a hostile country against an US politician, if it's no "treason" then what is it?

Absurd thing is the criminal has stole the seat of presidency, now accuse victim "treason". What happens to the US? What I could say is, US is hijaked by a mob group - the Deep State which rules the nation in rogue's way.

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

The Feds had a coup in 2016 president election. To escort their candidate Trump to the POTUS, they colluded with Russians to hack the emails of Clinton and accused her of "treason" for using private server.

Not treason, but certainly gross mishandling of classified information.

That's a strange logic. The whole case was like a mob group (Trump and his group, the Feds) bribed a thief(Russia) to steal money (emails) from victim (Clinton) who put her money in her purse (private server) instead of a safe. Then say Clinton was a criminal because purse was not a safe place for money.

Clinton was not the victim. Uncle Sam was the victim. Clinton was entrusted with safeguarding Uncle Sam's property, and if she put in her purse, where it could easily be taken by thief and had no business being anyway, when federal law required it to be stored in a government vault, that is very much on her. Whether it was actually stolen is irrelevant. "Nothing was actually stolen" is not a defense.

Foreign intelligence agencies are not beholden to US law, and nothing in international law prohibits foreign theft of US government secrets. Tough cookies, try keeping them more secure next time. The government takes for granted that if foreign intelligence has the opportunity to access classified information they will do so. US intelligence would do the same if the roles were reversed.

 

[DaisyDay]

From the sounds of things, there was no security whatsoever on her mail server. They weren't even using SSL. Anybody could connect to the server and get whatever they want.

That's not "hacking". In fact, depending on which court a suspect winds up in, connecting to an unsecured mail server might not even be considered a crime in the strictest sense of the word.

I don't think most Boomers really understand this technology, what it is, what it does or how it works. To them, I think it's just a Magic Box that shows them email and cat pictures and that's just about all they know or care to know.

Yeah, like the average Millennial can explain how it all works...

If we rule out the possibility of intentional negligence on the secretary's part, the only logical explanation that I can think of is that Hillary Clinton is a conventional Boomer and doesn't understand why her mail server would've needed to be secured.

The really sad thing is that the tools to make it secure are either free or else available for absurdly cheap prices. She could've secured her server using only a small fraction of the money she was paid by banks before 2016.

But she's just a typical Boomer.

Still, in the plus column, the Internet is poised to become a lot less dangerous to be on when the Boomers are too old (or too dead) to use it anymore.

Wow, you really despise older people. Who do you think developed the technology?

 

[thecolorsblend]

Yeah, like the average Millennial can explain how it all works...

Can we explain things like DNS, nameservers and all that? Actually yeah, in a lot of cases we probably can.

But even those who can't explain the technology still grasp the technology on an intuitive level. We understand what it is and how to use it because we came of age (or grew up) doing so.

Meanwhile, a lot of Boomers still think it's funny or cute or something that they've been using computers heavily for in excess of twenty years and are still hopelessly incompetent with them.

Wow, you really despise older people.

My post barely scratched the surface.

 

[katsung47]

The criminal is the FBI. They have duty to protect government information, include Clinton's. But it seems Clinton knew nothing at that time. Who was Donald Trump? He is a business man at that time.

The point is, how could Trump know Clinton have government emails in her private server and openly called Russia to hack it?
How could Russia have answered his call right away? And he even intimidated Clinton to put her into jail. My conclusion Trump is the candidate of the FBI is very correct. This news is a deliberate leaking. The real story is much more deep and complex.

 

[katsung47]

FBI were briefed three times that Clinton's emails were hacked.

CHINA HACKED HILLARY CLINTON’S PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER

The statement does not address a central aspect of TheDCNF’s reporting, which was that the ICIG briefed top bureau officials on three separate occasions to warn the FBI of an “anomaly” they found 30,000 in-bound and outgoing emails. Former Director of the FBI James Comey himself conceded in July 2016 that while the Bureau assessed the server could have been exploited, “given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.”

“It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account,” Comey concluded.

According to two independent sources, ICIG found such evidence and briefed the FBI on it three times.

After releasing the statement, the FBI refused to confirm or deny to TheDCNF that such briefings ever happened.

SOURCES: China Hacked Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server

 

[DaisyDay]

My post barely scratched the surface.

Lovely.

 

[BNR32FAN]

From the sounds of things, there was no security whatsoever on her mail server. They weren't even using SSL. Anybody could connect to the server and get whatever they want.

That's not "hacking". In fact, depending on which court a suspect winds up in, connecting to an unsecured mail server might not even be considered a crime in the strictest sense of the word.

I don't think most Boomers really understand this technology, what it is, what it does or how it works. To them, I think it's just a Magic Box that shows them email and cat pictures and that's just about all they know or care to know.

If we rule out the possibility of intentional negligence on the secretary's part, the only logical explanation that I can think of is that Hillary Clinton is a conventional Boomer and doesn't understand why her mail server would've needed to be secured.

The really sad thing is that the tools to make it secure are either free or else available for absurdly cheap prices. She could've secured her server using only a small fraction of the money she was paid by banks before 2016.

But she's just a typical Boomer.

Still, in the plus column, the Internet is poised to become a lot less dangerous to be on when the Boomers are too old (or too dead) to use it anymore.

A MAGIC BOX?!! A WITCH!!! BURN HER!! BURN THE WITCH!! Lol

 

[katsung47]

Trump Uses Unsecured iPhone Even Though China, Russia Are Listening In: Report

Lydia O'Connor,HuffPost• October 24, 2018

Former and current officials connected to President Donald Trump revealed that Russian and Chinese spies are tapping into calls he takes on his personal cellphone, which his aides have repeatedly warned him is vulnerable to such infiltration, according to a New York Times report published Wednesday.

Perhaps most frustrating, the unnamed sources said, is that Trump has continued to use an iPhone even after his aides told him that foreign agents successfully hacked him, likely gaining valuable insights into how they could best manipulate him and his administration’s policies.

Trump Uses Unsecured iPhone Even Though China, Russia Are Listening In: Report