(I've heard of Furniture Polish before...)
On a related note,...
Straight Lesbians Want Their Identity Back (it's safe )
Chuck Hoskin Jr. He would have more credibility if he had a Cherokee name.The principal chief of the Cherokee Nation wants Jeep to stop using the tribe’s name on its SUVs, saying it “does not honor us by having our name plastered on the side of a car.”
Jeep started using the Cherokee name more than 45 years ago, including on the brand’s top-selling Grand Cherokee SUV. It also offers a smaller SUV called the Cherokee, which was its third best-selling vehicle last year in the U.S.
“I think we’re in a day and age in this country where it’s time for both corporations and team sports to retire the use of Native American names, images and mascots from their products, team jerseys and sports in general,” Chuck Hoskin Jr., principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, said in a statement. “I’m sure this comes from a place that is well-intended, but it does not honor us by having our name plastered on the side of a car.”
Chief of Cherokee Nation wants Jeep to stop using tribe's name on SUVs (cnbc.com)
This spelling seems to be for a different pronunciation.tsalagi
Chuck Hoskin Jr. He would have more credibility if he had a Cherokee name.
Washington could of picked something better than "Football Team". A tad boring.I think there are issues with derogatory names like "Redskins", versus a possible trademark issue like the name of a tribe. The EX President has been paid for the use of his name on buildings and golf courses and bad vodka and bad steaks and a fraudulent "University", for example.
The Washington Lobbyists.Washington could of picked something better than "Football Team". A tad boring.
Hello @Chrystal-J, Chrysler-Jeep's use of "Cherokee" hardly seems a dishonorable use of the name So I think there is a different reason behind Chief Hoskin Jr.'s complaint (my bet is that it has to do with $$*, but we shall see).
--David
p.s. if $$ is his real motivation and he prevails in court (gets Chrysler-Jeep to pay him for their long-time, and then perhaps ongoing, use of the name, "Cherokee"), just think of all of the businesses, products, cities, states (I believe that more than half of our states have Native American names of some kind, if memory serves), and the like that are named after Native American tribes, chiefs, etc., that could be forced to pay damages (for the past use of a name) and/or royalties (for the continued use of a name) to various tribes and/or families and/or individuals by using the same tactic, in lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit I admit that, if true, it is a savvy business move on the part of Chief Haskins, Jr., but I still don't like it.
Chief "Pontiac"
How dumb is this. Companies use names that represent the supposed virtues of the products. That the name "Cherokee" is synonymous with a capable off road vehicle (according to Jeep at least) should be considered a compliment. No doubt the problem would go away if a sufficient amount of money was offered for the use of the name.
Where have these complainants been for umpteen years? I call this the band wagon affect. If it wa$ $o offen$ive why did it take 45 year$ for someone to complain.
To name it Jeep "Polish" for instance, would denote disrespect, at least unfortunately many would see it that way due to the uncalled for jokes.
But in my view, naming the Jeep after Cherokee, is very respectful. Its respecting what used to be, and in some cases still are, a people who are known for their great experience with the outdoors, and Jeep has always been about the outdoors.
But hey, let the people who made this a problem have their attention, because I think that is all they are after, making themselves look good to the more small minded among them.
Mascot-izing generally is kind of patronizing even when complimentary. Save it for animals or occupations, not ethnicities or other nations.I doesn't sound like the original naming choice was done in a pejorative sense, but more as a compliment.
View attachment 295364
There are certain "ethnic naming choices" which are clearly caricaturizing the group they naming it after, and other ones that appear to be more from a place of respect.
For instance, the sport bike called the "Ninja" (...I don't think that was done out of any sort of disrespect toward Japanese feudal history) is different than a team using the "Fighting Irish" logo (which is clearly a caricature)
Mascot-izing generally is kind of patronizing even when complimentary. Save it for animals or occupations, not ethnicities or other nations.
I'm talking about commercial branding of specific products. Generic names for food items arise organically in the culture, and thats fine. But taking a peoples name to brand your own private product.... no.So would you consider even a name as mascot-izing?
It seems like an awful lot of things will need to be renamed if that's the case.
...and it seems like the efforts are often times directed at changing names for things pertaining to groups that are seen as part of the "non-privileged" groups.
For instance, "Polish Boy" sandwiches... (they're pretty popular here in northeast Ohio)
Washington Post even runs recipe articles about how to make one
https://www.washingtonpost.com/recipes/polish-boy/15380/
Who do I call a WaPo to get them to stop using my heritage to describe a sausage sandwich covered in french fries?
(sarcasm of course, those sandwiches are delicious, and I'm not at all offended)
...and the same seems to go with the concept of cultural appropriation.
For instance, there was a social media efforts critiquing white women who wore certain types of braids in their hair...or the recent one where Rhianna was wearing a necklace depicting a symbol of Hinduism...or when Forever 21 was pressured into an apology for depicting a white model wearing a "Wakanda Forever" shirt on their website (from the movie Black Panther).
Yet, the people who seem to get the most offended about that probably wouldn't see this as "problematic":
View attachment 295368
View attachment 295369
Actually I did read the article before I replied. I even looked up more information and found out the peoples we refer to as "Cherokee" the native pronunciation of their name is "Tsalagi." And OBTW one of nieces is married to a full blooded native Cherokee.I wonder how many of the folks taking an uncharitable view of the Chief actually bothered to read the article in the OP rather than just the headline.