Chesterton’s lack of temperance could block his canonization

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,444
56,155
Woods
✟4,663,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
G.K. Chesterton wrote, “[W]e should thank God for beer and Burgundy by not drinking too much of them.” Privately, he joked, “One pint is enough, two pints is one too many, three pints isn’t half enough.”
Which of the sayings did he live by?


This is part of what Fr. John Udris will research. Fr. Udris is the cleric conducting the inquiry into Chesterton’s cause for canonization. Catholic Household e-mailed to ask if Chesterton’s eating and drinking habits would factor into the inquiry. Fr. Udris promptly responded, “The short answer to your query is YES – obviously any investigation into his sanctity will entail answering doubts in this regard.”


So, what are the doubts? Is it even so important to answer them since, as is frequently heard, there are many “fat saints” in the Church? St. Thomas Aquinas typically heads the list, and St. John XXIII is given as a recent example. In St. Thomas’ case, as Chesterton wrote, legends about his weight are “exaggerated” (see note at the end of article) and there is certainly no documentation he was intemperate. Temperance, the moderate use of created goods, is a cardinal virtue, and its exemplary practice is necessary for canonization.


Surprisingly, in a case like St. John XXIII, documentation suggests he was temperate, even heroically. The pope dispensed the papal privilege of eating alone in order to dine with others, and ate, according to his secretary and witnesses, like a bird. He avoided fatty foods, lived into his 80’s and died of cancer.


While awaiting Fr. Udris’ findings, in a process that can take years, what evidence do we currently have about Chesterton in regards to temperance?

Continued- G.K. Chesterton's intemperance may throw a wrench in his cause for canonization...
 

Katholish

Newbie
Oct 3, 2008
116
18
Virginia
✟7,836.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Republican
It has been a fun exchange to read. Dale Ahlquist made some good points, but if Chesterton really weighed over 400lbs... I don't know... it seems like the burden of proof is on establishing that Chesterton didn't bring it upon himself. I.e., establishing there was some kind of medical condition.
 
Upvote 0