What is there to engage, though?
You make it sound as if it's blind following of my position. I've cited the numerous studies and data for why I believe what I do.
The reason why I keep reiterating the part about the courts is precisely because nobody from your side of this debate is acknowledging it or listening. People keep insisting that because the courts awarded money to people who claimed injuries were the result of vaccines, that somehow validates the position of the people who were awarded the money. The courts released a statement specifically addressing that (so there would be no confusion...joke was on them apparently) so that people wouldn't take away the wrong impression of their ruling.
If you want to continue believing that those court rulings validate your position (even though the courts themselves say they don't), then you're right, this conversation has run its course.
But you can't portray it as if the other side are "blind followers" when it's our side that actually has more supporting evidence. Following with no evidence would be blind...following the position that's produced the most reliable evidence is the sensible thing to do.
There is so much. Too much to even address again at this point, and certainly not with someone whose mind is snapped closed on this issue. And you can believe that monetary judgments to shut people up is a well known tactic, utilized in all consumer law. If you think it is a merely innocent way to dispose of cases, you are more naive than you think. The preponderance of the evidence would suggest that legitimate investigation should be commenced.
Familiar with Dr. William Thompson?
https://www.focusforhealth.org/dr-brian-hooker-statement-william-thompson/
He's a former CDC doctor who participated in falsifying data at CDC request, and he's willing now to testify to Congress about how the data was manipulated. Interestingly, none of this was picked up in mainstream media. Not one Congressional committee chair has called a hearing to subpoena Dr. Thompson and investigate fraud at the CDC. Ever.
Vaccine trials are closed. Not open. No one is permitted to hear this evidence. No reports ever show up on the news. 3.7 billion paid out so far and this isn't news, apparently.
No legitimate,double-blind safety trials are ever done on vaccines. There are manipulated studies done - let's compare this vaccine against two other vaccines, and see how they all fare after 5 days...see, it's no worse than they are (maybe all are bad over time - that needs to be studied, before just indiscriminately recommended). There IS no evidence. Simply constant repetition that all vaccines are safe at all times and in all quantities.
That isn't evidence, especially when there is a literal flood of opposing parental evidence, never investigated, just silenced and ridiculed. Not an anecdote or two. Literally thousands of reports over time.
With every other product, if something happens to even a couple of people, the product is pulled from the market and a legitimate investigation is underway. Someone gets sick from lettuce or crackers or some random kitchen item? Product pulled.
All the Major Food Recalls of 2018 So Far
Someone gets sick from Tylenol? Product pulled.
Tylenol Recalled for Moldy Smell
New MS drug has 8 bad reactions? Product pulled (in EUROPE, where they care about health).
Multiple sclerosis drug pulled from market after reports of brain inflammation
Thousands of vaccine reaction reports come rolling in? Well, let's keep that quiet; no need to rock the boat.
If you think this peculiarly disparate treatment of vaccines isn't a problem, I cannot help you. ALL of these scenarios need to be treated in
exactly the same way and all investigated thoroughly.
Any time the government and media refuse to address an issue like this, you should be paying attention.
