Excellent post, VOW! Squelchmaster, think about something for a minute? Suppose there really IS a real devil, a "fallen-angel"; who has no real power. Now suppose he was really angry at God (because of his own pride and arrogance), so that after the fall he would set out to MURDER-ETERNALLY as many people as he could. With me on this?
Now, he KNOWS he doesn't have any real power. What if he could
convince someone that they were totally lost? Suppose there was a man, very much like yourself, sinking helplessly into quicksand. And there, plain-as-day is a guy in a white robe, HOLDING OUT A STRONG OLIVE BRANCH TO YOU! And he's shouting: "GRAB IT! I'LL RESCUE YOU! I CARE FOR YOU!" But that "fallen angel" WANTS you to die. What would he do?
I'll TELL you what he'll do---he'll try to drown out your rescuer's voice, he'll cover your eyes, he'll keep telling you "YOU'RE LOST! THERE'S NO HOPE!
GIVE UP!!!"
...and all the while, that branch is just inches away from your hand. If you would
only reach out and take it.
That's what's really happening, Squelchmaster.
JESUS is holding out that olive branch to YOU. And the father of lies is FURIOUS, screaming in RAGE: "It's no GOOD! You're LOST! GIVE UP!" Lies, my friend. All lies.
Two things need to happen. The bad-guy needs to SHUT UP AND LEAVE YOU ALONE. This will ONLY happen when you CLAIM the blood of JESUS. Pray to Christ right now, ask Him to guide you, GIVE YOURSELF TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY TO THE ONE WHO LOVES YOU INFINITELY! Then TELL the devil to go away! WHEN you belong to God, the devil HAS NO CHOICE but to GO AWAY!!!
...then reach out your hand, and TAKE that branch. He's pretty strong, He can pull you from the quicksand. Do you see? He's holding a clean, white robe for you?
Maybe it will take some counselling---heck, EVERYONE needs counselling SOMEtimes. If you wanna get from point "A" to point "B" in the fastest way possible, you stop and ask directions. That simple. Take VOW's advice. And our aditional prayer for you, will be to find a real, godly, minister.
No where is it stated that "true" knowledge equals faith.
How, if you were John or Peter or Paul, how would you write words to indicate someone who's REALLY SAVED? This is why I quoted 2Pet1. "WE have ESCAPED the corruption of the world through the TRUE KNOWLEDGE of the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST". Undeniably saved.
Then we read in chapter two, of a group of people who have "TRULY ESCAPED the defilements of the world through the TRUE KNOWLEDGE of the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST". Was the second group saved? Read on: "Far better to have never KNOWN the way of righteousness, than HAVING KNOWN it, to turn away from the holy commandment delivered to them..."
But you contend they were NEVER SAVED.
So, as I feared, you are going to insist that your interpretation is plainly right, but mainly because it supports your predecided argument. I do not find your arguments that the entangled folks were saved / the Elect at all convincing.
OK, tell me the truth---honestly---which of us seems to be more inclined towards "predecided arguments"? The first group was saved. The second wasn't? If Peter had been trying to communicate that they HAD been saved, please tell me what he would have had to have said, DIFFERENTLY? What words WOULD CONVEY the concept of "saved-then-lost"? What words,
beyond what he wrote???
the Elect and the born again are two different sets of people?
We, who are "born-again", "Christ-IN-us",
are the Elect...
we are born again to God's spirit, but then God sometimes doesn't complete the work?
"He who began a good work will bring it to completion." (Philp1) But how are we "born again to God's Spirit"? Through surrender to Jesus. LORDSHIP SALVATION. And we WILL be "presented holy and blameless and beyond reproach,
IF INDEED WE CONTINUE in the faith firmly established and steadfast and
NOT BE MOVED AWAY FROM THE HOPE(which is to say, 'NOT BE MOVED AWAY FROM
JESUS!) of the gospel..."
So, NO He sometimes does NOT complete the work. If the roots are shallow, and it withers and dies, if they are moved away from Him,
they are uncompleted...
gives us faith, but then takes it away?
God does not give us "faith-unto-salvation". THAT kind of faith "comes from hearing". He first reveals Himself to every man, and then allows the man (or woman) to accept Him or reject Him. Only to those who RECEIVE Him does He give the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name. Jn1:12
No God does not give-faith-and-then-take-it-away. "The gifts and calling of God are irrevocable". But "revokable" (God-toward-man), and "rejectable" (man-toward-God), are very different concepts...
This verse is not about losing salvation, it's about talking people into salvation that were not called by God but were brought to enlightenment by men and not by God.
I disagree. The FULCRUM of this entire passage, is the single word: SINCE. What is not being understood here, is the tense of the Greek words. It does not actually say "IF THEY FALL AWAY", it really says, "WHILE THEY ARE FALLING AWAY". You contend they were never saved? They were partakers of the Holy Spirit, even though they were unsaved? Do you think the Holy Spirit indwells the unsaved??? (2Pet1:4)
The are unrepentant, SINCE (BECAUSE!) they "crucify to themselves Christ anew and hold Him up to contempt." THEY are the entire problem here. They have been "hardened by the deceitfulness of sin, in falling away from the living God" (Heb3:12-13), they have become contemptuous of Christ. They WILL not repent WHILE they are contemptuous and falling away. If they continue falling away and contemptuous, they will remain thorns and thistles, and will be burned.
11 We want each of you to show this same diligence to the very end, in order to make your hope sure. 12 We do not want you to become lazy, but to imitate those who through faith and patience inherit what has been promised.
Paul (if he wrote Heb) is calling for DILIGENCE, exactly as in Col1:23, exactly as in 2Pet1:10, to make CERTAIN that we do not fall away, to MAKE OUR HOPE SURE, so that we will GO TO HEAVEN and NOT FALL. This verse supports "Free Will", perfectly...
I agree it is a misunderstood passage. I do not believe I misunderstand it...