RnMom said:
If God desired all men without exception to be saved and He can not accomplish what he desires he would be a castrated God..not the God of creation whose word ALWAYS accomplishes what it is intended to do . So what might we see from that ? Perhaps a misreading of PAS??
RnMom, salvation is based on LOVE; undeserved. Grace is because He loved us.
Love does not coerce; love only asks. God certainly has the power to FORCE people to believe --- but then what would be the fellowship? Love? No.
And "PAS" may mean in some places "certain ones", but there is no way to rework passages like Rom5:18; had there BEEN an inequality between the two words "PAS", Paul would have STATED it; instead, he makes an exact EQUALITY.
I could easily be converted to Calvinism, if there was some way of understanding 2Pet2:20-22 to mean "THEY WERE NEVER SAVED"; but I know that in Greek it says "truly escaped through the saved-knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, but now really spiritually-turned-away from the faith". If there was some way to understand "brethren if any of you wander from the faith" as NEVER SAVED. If there was a way to see that "begun by the Spirit, WERE running WELL" either WERE NOT SAVED, or "fallen from grace and severed from Christ" does NOT mean "fallen/severed". I would embrace Calvinism if the "turn-away-from-God" verses (like Heb3:12-14, 12:25, 2:1-2, 2Pet3:17, Col2:8, 2Cor11:3, 1Tim4:1) could be made to fit "you can never REALLY fall". I could accept Limited Atonement if I could see "Savior of the WORLD" or "propitiation to the SAVED
AND the WHOLE WORLD", or "Savior of ALL MEN,
ABOVE ALL (malista) believers", or "justification to ALL MEN" or "let WHOSOEVER WILL take of the water of life FREELY" -- as interpretable to "LIMITED". I could be "secure in my eternal salvation" if there was some way of taking all the WARNINGS and satisfactorily understanding them as EMPTY-BUGBEAR (Col1:23, 2:8, 2Pet1:10, 3:14,17, 1Tim4:1,16, 2Pet1:10-11, Heb2:1-3, 3:12-14, 4:1, 6:4-6, 10, 12:25, 2Cor11:3, 13:5), on and on and on.
Calvinists have failed to convince me of their way to understand all these verses, and more. We seem to have reached an IMPASS --- I post verses that speak of "Jesus died for ALL", you (Calvinists) say "it's only SOME"; I show verses that say "will" and "desire" and "want", you say "of COURSE they want evil they must be CHANGED FIRST"; but rebuke after rebuke is given --- to whom?
To those that CANNOT repent? Does that make SENSE? Yes, to Calvinists,
it does.
Jesus said, "If you do not believe Moses' writings, how will you believe My words?" (Jn5:47 --- notice He said "you don't believe Moses", not "God has not enabled you to receive spiritual things). At the risk of angering my Calvinistic brothers and sisters,
I feel the same way. I admit I do not know how to convince you of all that I have just written in this post. How can I convince you that the CROSS, was EFFECTIVE? That "many called few chosen" places the ONUS of UNCHOSEN, on MEN? Alas, I cannot.
This being impass, then let us lay aside our differences, and pursue love; RnMom, in these discussions you are a Calvinist who has come across as KIND; yet while we have been talking,
the world has been watching. Words have flown here, like "liar" and "deceiver" and "hypocrite" and "sanctimonious" and "dishonest" and "heretic" and "warped" and "prideful" and "Mormon" and "Legalist" and "unrepentant" and "blasphemous" --- and, once, "GAY".
Jesus said, "You will know them by their fruits"; how have we made ourselves known to the world?
I do love you, RnMom; and you, Woody, and Frumanchu, and CDL, and ABIC, and Mounts, and Calgal and all my Calvinistic brothers and sisters; and Received and Romanbear and Sunbeam and all my OSNAS brethren.
I desire for each of you exactly what I desire for me --- spiritual growth, Christlike maturity, that each of us be found in the center of His will. If we can agree on FELLOWSHIPPING with God, indwelt by Christ and the Holy Spirit, let's lay aside the differences
and agree on love.
The most important aspect of our Christianity, at this juncture, is HARVEST.