Jonaitis
Soli Deo Gloria
- Jan 4, 2019
- 5,225
- 4,212
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Some argue that there is an "exception clause" for divorce, specifically if the spouse commits adultery. Is this true? I don't think so.
It is clear from Matthew 19:3-6 that Jesus affirms the permanence of a marriage union until death. God permitted divorce under the Old Covenant on account of their hardness of heart, but our Lord clearly states that marriage isn't something you can truly make and break. Once God joins two persons as one, they remain one until death. This is why Jesus said that divorcing your spouse makes them commit adultery, and that whoever marries a divorced person commits adultery, because as long as that partner remains alive they remain married before God, despite legally saying otherwise. This is not to say that remarriage is a life-long sin, but it is a defiling of another man's wife. Marriage is a serious deal, it isn't some civil contract, it is covenant union between two persons before God.
How about that "exception clause" that people defend? I have heard, and agree, that there is no exception to divorce. The Greek used for "sexual immorality" (inappropriate contentea) is different than the one for "adultery," and I think this is important to understand. It is understood that Jesus isn't referring to an act of infidelity in the marriage bed, but rather a case of fornication during a betrothal. In other words, divorce is permissible if there was sexual misconduct found out during the process of marriage. We see this very thing almost in practice with Joseph and Mary. Despite being betrothed, and not yet living with each other, they were still considered husband and wife according to Matthew 1:18-19 and 24. It was treated as though it they were already married. When Mary was found pregnant, Joseph planned to "divorce her quietly." This wasn't some novel idea of his, but may have been a common protocol in the case of assumed immorality. In the Old Testament, such a person could be stoned if found unchaste. Jesus' audience knew what he referred to more than we do, and this is likely the case. Otherwise, Christ contradicts himself by calling marriage a life-long union.
It is clear from Matthew 19:3-6 that Jesus affirms the permanence of a marriage union until death. God permitted divorce under the Old Covenant on account of their hardness of heart, but our Lord clearly states that marriage isn't something you can truly make and break. Once God joins two persons as one, they remain one until death. This is why Jesus said that divorcing your spouse makes them commit adultery, and that whoever marries a divorced person commits adultery, because as long as that partner remains alive they remain married before God, despite legally saying otherwise. This is not to say that remarriage is a life-long sin, but it is a defiling of another man's wife. Marriage is a serious deal, it isn't some civil contract, it is covenant union between two persons before God.
How about that "exception clause" that people defend? I have heard, and agree, that there is no exception to divorce. The Greek used for "sexual immorality" (inappropriate contentea) is different than the one for "adultery," and I think this is important to understand. It is understood that Jesus isn't referring to an act of infidelity in the marriage bed, but rather a case of fornication during a betrothal. In other words, divorce is permissible if there was sexual misconduct found out during the process of marriage. We see this very thing almost in practice with Joseph and Mary. Despite being betrothed, and not yet living with each other, they were still considered husband and wife according to Matthew 1:18-19 and 24. It was treated as though it they were already married. When Mary was found pregnant, Joseph planned to "divorce her quietly." This wasn't some novel idea of his, but may have been a common protocol in the case of assumed immorality. In the Old Testament, such a person could be stoned if found unchaste. Jesus' audience knew what he referred to more than we do, and this is likely the case. Otherwise, Christ contradicts himself by calling marriage a life-long union.
Upvote
0