SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,201
11,829
✟331,677.00
Faith
Catholic
Can Biology Class Reduce Racism?
Biology textbooks used in American high schools do not go near the sensitive question of whether genetics can explain why African-Americans are overrepresented as football players and why a disproportionate number of American scientists are white or Asian.

But in a study starting this month, a group of biology teachers from across the country will address it head-on. They are testing the idea that the science classroom may be the best place to provide a buffer against the unfounded genetic rationales for human difference that often become the basis for racial intolerance.
At a recent training in Colorado, the dozen teachers who had volunteered to participate in the experiment acknowledged the challenges of inserting the combustible topic of race and ancestry into straightforward lessons [challenging] a prevailing belief among science educators that questions about race are best left to their counterparts in social studies.

That view stems from the history of today’s racial categories, which arose long before the field of genetics and have been used to justify all manner of discriminatory policies. Race, a social concept bound up in culture and family, is not a topic of study in modern human population genetics, which typically uses concepts like “ancestry” or “population” to describe geographic genetic groupings.

But that has not stopped many Americans from believing that genes cause racial groups to have distinct skills, traits and abilities. And among some biology teachers, there has been a growing sense that avoiding any direct mention of race in their genetics curriculum may be backfiring.
Human population geneticists have long emphasized that racial disparities found in society do not in themselves indicate corresponding genetic differences. A recent paper by leading researchers in the field invokes statistical models to argue that health disparities between black and white Americans are more readily explained by environmental effects such as racism than the DNA they inherited from ancestors.

Yet there is a rising concern that genetic misconceptions are playing into divisive American attitudes about race.

In a 2018 survey of 721 students from affluent, majority-white high schools, Dr. Donovan found that one in five agreed with statements like “Members of one racial group are more ambitious than members of another racial group because of genetics.”

[...]

For his part, Dr. Donovan has argued that grade-school biology classes may offer the only opportunity to dispel unfounded genetic explanations for racial inequality on a mass scale. Middle schools and high schools are the first, and perhaps the only, place that most Americans are taught about genetics.
 

nonaeroterraqueous

Nonexistent Member
Aug 16, 2014
2,915
2,724
✟188,987.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I'm uncomfortable with this approach. Since the beginning of the eugenics movement, biology has been used to justify racial discrimination. It was the excuse given for the WWII atrocities, and the attitude was even there during the first World War. Though I'm sure biological race doesn't play the big part that racists make it out to be, we do have to admit that different races do, in fact, have genetic differences (otherwise, they'd be the same race). Difference inherently means that one will be better in some ways than another. That's why I don't want to go down that road. It would be better for people to see each other the way God does, to value a person for their character and moral worth, to support them in their weakness and rely on them in their strength. Too much deference to biology is only going to lead to too much emphasis on race, which is what we need to get away from.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,246
36,566
Los Angeles Area
✟829,553.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I'm uncomfortable with this approach. Since the beginning of the eugenics movement,

It will certainly be a challenge to present the material accurately and diplomatically, but it's useful to fight misinformation with good information. Eugenics is pseudoscience; it and misinformation about race can be combatted with sound science.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,185
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,728,693.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Biblically speaking, there’s only one race.


God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
— Genesis 1:27

and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,
— Acts 17:26

If the Bible isn’t enough, NatGeo did an article (behind a paywall) titled “There’s No Scientific Basis for Race - It’s a Made Up Label”.

So “racism” is just sin.
 
Upvote 0

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,201
11,829
✟331,677.00
Faith
Catholic
Though I'm sure biological race doesn't play the big part that racists make it out to be, we do have to admit that different races do, in fact, have genetic differences (otherwise, they'd be the same race).
And this statement is exactly why we need biology classes to address the misconceptions expressed here.
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,075.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Biblically speaking, there’s only one race.


God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
— Genesis 1:27

and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,
— Acts 17:26

If the Bible isn’t enough, NatGeo did an article (behind a paywall) titled “There’s No Scientific Basis for Race - It’s a Made Up Label”.

So “racism” is just sin.

I believe racism is sin and that we were all created by God, and made in His image and in Christ we are all brothers and sisters.

that said, evolutionarily speaking, we all evolved within the confines of our environments, and that lends to differences on a genetic and scientific level.

when natural selection is in play, the genes that are more favorable to sustaining life in the environment your in are the ones that get passed down to the next generation and so forth.

Human beings aren't identical twins of one another, and God does not give the same gifts to all -to one He gives one thing, to another something else. In this way, we find we all excel in some areas, and have shortcomings in others.

This actually lends very well to a balanced human race which can work together and help one another, and is a net positive all things considered..
 
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,349
Los Angeles
✟111,507.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate

It would exponentiate racism; there are some very smart people who are racists. Eugenics is built on these types of people.

People who have actual racist views should be forced to live as the racial object of demise for at least a year - in the same native environments - as a public service and/or education program. It would be like serving in the military - especially since you could get seriously injured or die, and no one would care.
 
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,349
Los Angeles
✟111,507.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate
I see no downside to fact based instruction whether it is on genetics or any other subject.

Literally because some people cannot handle truth is the reason why there is a downside.

Racism is psychological, not academic: no amount of academia is going to fix people's ideology about humanity - especially if they aren't considered human.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Literally because some people cannot handle truth is the reason why there is a downside.

Racism is psychological, not academic: no amount of academia is going to fix people's ideology about humanity - especially if they aren't considered human.

I don't see how some people not handling the truth is a downside of instructing people with facts. Instruction is not supposed to fix anyone it is only supposed to supply people with correct information. If people refuse to use that information to come logical conclusions, that is on them not on the instruction they received.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What if the study finds genetic differences?

Everyone has genetic differences. No two people are exactly genetically alike. Except maybe twins, triplets etc. or clones .
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Everyone has genetic differences. No two people are exactly genetically alike. Except maybe twins, triplets etc. or clones .

So why the study?

And how will yet another study help? And isn't this just another study being done because we don't like the results of earlier studies?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,246
36,566
Los Angeles Area
✟829,553.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
What if the study finds genetic differences?

This thread is about how to address the issue in biology class.

The studies have already been done and show that there is more variation within a standard 'racial' category than there is between on group and another. The number of genes responsible for the external appearance is relatively small.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This thread is about how to address the issue in biology class.

The studies have already been done and show that there is more variation within a standard 'racial' category than there is between on group and another. The number of genes responsible for the external appearance is relatively small.

Yet the external appearance difference is profound.

Because of the 'combustibility' of this topic, as noted in the op, we'd best be careful.
 
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So why the study?

And how will yet another study help? And isn't this just another study being done because we don't like the results of earlier studies?

From what I can tell the study begins with a conclusion and is looking for evidence to support actions based upon that conclusion.

" the science classroom may be the best placed to provide a a buffer against unfounded genetic rationales for human difference that often become the basis for racial intolerance. "

IMO it is not really a study but an attempt to gather evidence to support that idea.
News outlets often mischaracterize these sorts of things as studies. To many supposed journalists, if people that can be considered scientists are doing something, no matter what that something might be, it is a study. Not every worthwhile thing must start with an actual study. If we agree that racial intolerance is bad, we do not need a study to prove it before we attempt to combat it. If we agree that facts are more reliable than feelings, we do not need a study to prove it before we use facts rather than feelings to inform people. So if these people can indeed provide factual evidence to students that will provide a buffer against unfounded rationales, I am all for it.
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,075.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It would exponentiate racism; there are some very smart people who are racists. Eugenics is built on these types of people.

People who have actual racist views should be forced to live as the racial object of demise for at least a year - in the same native environments - as a public service and/or education program. It would be like serving in the military - especially since you could get seriously injured or die, and no one would care.


Oh re-education camps, how novel..

:sigh:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yet the external appearance difference is profound.

Because of the 'combustibility' of this topic, as noted in the op, we'd best be careful.

I do not see those external differences as being very profound at all.
 
Upvote 0