• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.

Calif. high court asked to hear gay marriage cases

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Washington, Nov 17, 2008.

  1. Washington

    Washington Well-Known Member

    +331
    Agnostic
    By LISA LEFF –

    "SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The state attorney general and sponsors of the ballot initiative that banned same-sex marriage in California urged its Supreme Court to hear a series of lawsuits seeking to overturn the ban, saying the matter is too urgent to be unsettled.

    "The petitions raise issues of statewide importance, implicating not only California's marriage laws but also the initiative process and the Constitution itself," Attorney General Jerry Brown argued in his filing.

    "This court can provide certainty and finality in this matter," he said."

    source
     
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. Jessica Lauren

    Jessica Lauren Out of The Darkness

    +71
    Christian
    Single
    US-Democrat
    Good. :) Anxious to hear the final outcome. . .
     
  3. Dracil

    Dracil Nekomimi

    +231
    Catholic
    Single
    Interesting.

    In any case, IF Prop 8 actually stands and isn't simply dismissed for violating the democratic process (by pretending to be an amendment instead of a revision), that just means in 2 years Prop 8 will get overturned. Over the course of 8 years, people who don't want same-sex marriage had their winning margin drop from 23% to 4%. In 2 more years, especially with so much anger when Prop 8 passed, it's going to be strongly in favor of same-sex marriage.

    Especially since in 2 years, more old people (who generally oppose same-sex marriages) will be dead and replaced by new younger voters (who are generally in favor of it).
     
  4. Polycarp1

    Polycarp1 Born-again Liberal Episcopalian

    +1,548
    Anglican
    Married
    US-Democrat
    For those who need the explanation...

    California's Constitution prescribes that it may be amended, but not revised, by the initiative/proposition process, where a petition results in a ballot referendum on a measure. The term "revised" apparently includes both extensive revision of the document proper and also a measure that removes or restricts a previously held civil right. Somebody with expertise in California law can perhaps spell this out more clearly.

    Now the point to all this is that regardless of how you may feel about the legality and morality of gay marriage, under the May court decision and for six months thereafter, gay couples could legally contract marriages and Proposition 8 removed that right from them. According to petitioners, that makes Proposition 8 a "constitutional revision" and not an "amendment" under the technical procedures for amending the state constitution, and thus, if they're correct, something that could not legally be enacted by the proposition process.

    These petitions were before the court prior to the election, and were dismissed at that time without prejudice for lack of 'ripeness' -- that is, they challenged something that had not yet happened, the passage of Proposition 8. The courts declined to hear arguments and rule on the substantive question, since if Proposition 8 were defeated, the issue of its legality would be moot.

    Well, it did pass, and now the question of whether it was a valid exercise of the initiative/proposition route for amending the state constitution is a legitimate one. Some people are seeing this as sour grapes on the part of the No on 8 folks; to the contrary, it's refiling something the courts told them to wait and file again if Prop 8 passed.
     
  5. Sylvanspirits

    Sylvanspirits Senior Member

    +75
    Non-Denom
    Single
    US-Others
    With any luck the court will overturn Prop. 8 as being unconstitutional.
     
Loading...