The Grouch
Well-Known Member
- Oct 20, 2017
- 642
- 545
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
Er, what? What are you basing that on? Where a person has been given a life sentence with a minimum mandatory duration - e.g ‘so and so will serve a minimum of 15 yrs’, then at the end of that period the case will undergo review and might be extended, for specific reasons. However if you think that judges in the UK can keep anyone detained for any reason for as long as they want, you’re simply wrong.
No i agree its more complex than that as there are other sections of the state that can intervien say a judge locks someone up for no apparent reason its likely the judicial process would over turn that (as we see in the robinson case) and may even bring repercusions on the judge and if not then if the government percieves injustice it could over turn it. Finally the queen herself could pardon the individual but the state itself can conspire to arrest and detain individuals like we see in the case of the guilford four that the film in the name of the father exposes although in this case thw film portrays the conspiracy being centerd around police decpetion there could have been conspiracy within other branches also.
If the state determines a individual poses a risk it is entirely within its framwork to detain an individual indefinatly without a jury at her majestys pleasure until it deems the person is no longer a threat
Last edited:
Upvote
0