Brief History of Islamic Decapitations

P

Pious Jedi

Guest
Chopping Heads by Amir Taheri

Berg is, of course, not the first to be murdered in such a gruesome manner. Nor, alas, is he likely to be the last. For the cutting of heads (in Arabic, qata al-raas) has been the favorite form of Islamist execution for more than 14 centuries.

In the famous battles of early Islam, with the Prophet personally in command of the army of believers, the heads of enemy generals and soldiers were often cut off and put on sticks to be shown around villages and towns as a warning to potential adversaries.

In 680, the Prophet's favorite grandson, Hussein bin Ali, had his head chopped off in Karbala, central Iraq, by the soldiers of the Caliph Yazid. The severed head was put on a silver platter and sent to Damascus, Yazid's capital, before being sent further to Cairo for inspection by the Governor of Egypt. The Caliph's soldiers also cut off the heads of all of Hussein's 71 male companions, including the one-year-old baby boy Ali-Asghar.

Islamic history is full of chopped heads being sent around by special delivery to reassure rulers, to terrorize foes and to impress the common folk. In 1821, the Qajar king of Persia ordered a week of celebrations when he received the severed head of a Russian general who had been captured in a battle near Baku. In 1842, the Afghans massacred the British garrison in Kabul, a total of 2,000 men and their wives and children, chopping off their heads and putting them on sticks to decorate the city. (They allowed one man to leave to report to the British.)

In 1885, it was the turn of British Gen. Gordon to have his head chopped off and put on a stick in Khartoum after it had fallen to the forces of the Mahdi. Slightly later, Mullah Hassan, the Somali rebel known to the British as "the mad mullah" but to his fanatical supporters as "the Shah," made a habit of chopping Western heads in what is now Somalia. At one point he had a large collection of severed Italian and British heads.

Iran's Khomeinist mullahs also love severed heads. In April 1980, Ayatollah Sadeq Khalkhali wanted to cut off the heads of eight American soldiers who had died in a failed hostage rescue mission in the Iranian desert. He was prevented from doing so thanks to a last minute intervention by the Swiss government. In 1986, the Khomeinist mullahs cut off the head of William Buckley, the CIA's Beirut station chief who had been kidnapped by the Hezbollah and sent to Tehran for interrogation.

And in 1992, the mullahs sent a "specialist" to cut off the head of Shapour Bakhtiar, the shah's last prime minister, in a suburb of Paris. When the news broke, Hashemi Rafsanjani, then president of the Islamic Republic, publicly thanked Allah for having allowed "the severing of the head of the snake."

In 1993, Fereidun Farrokhzad, one of Iran's most famous pop stars, had his head chopped off in Germany by a Khomeinist hit squad after the mullahs issued a fatwa for his murder.

Chopping off heads was widely practiced throughout the Afghan wars of the 1980s. An estimated 3,000 Soviet soldiers, many of them Muslims, had their heads cut off by the Mujahedeen, who at the time enjoyed U.S. and other Western support. (In other cases the Mujahedeen cut off the testicles of the Soviet soldiers and fed them to other Soviet prisoners.)

Needless to say, rival Mujahedeen also chopped off each other's heads. The group led by one Haji Akbari was especially notorious in that respect. One of its members was Osama bin Laden.

Throughout the 1990s, head-chopping was routinely carried out by the Army for Islamic Salvation (AIS), the Islamic Armed Group (GIA), the Salafi Group for Preaching and Armed Jihad (GSPAJ) and other Islamist terror outfits.

One Algerian specialist in slitting throats and cutting off heads was known as Momo le Nain (Muhammad the Midget). He was a 20-plus-year-old butcher's apprentice recruited by the GIA for the purpose of cutting off people's heads. In 1996 in Ben-Talha, a suburb of the capital Algiers, Momo cut off a record 86 heads in one night, including the heads of more than a dozen children.

In recognition of his exemplary act of piety, the GIA sent him to Mecca for pilgrimage. Last time we checked, Momo was still at large somewhere in Algeria.

Four years ago, Iran was shocked by the murder of the well-known dissident leader Dariush Foruhar and his wife Parvaneh. The couple, in their 70s, had their heads chopped off and displayed on their mantelpiece. The regime blamed "rogue elements" within its Ministry for Intelligence and Security. But no one was punished.

Cutting heads is frequently practiced against clerics from non-Islamic faiths or even rival Islamic sects. At least four Christian priests and nine Sunni Muslim muftis have been murdered in that way in Iran since 2001.

In Pakistan, rival Sunni and Shiite groups have made a habit of sending cut-off heads of each other's activists by special delivery. By one estimate, over 400 heads have been chopped off and mailed since 1990.

Chopping heads is also practiced by Muslim militants on the Indonesian island of Borneo as a means of driving the Christian majority out. It has been effective in forcing nearly half of the island's Christians packing.

At one point in the 1980s, the Abu-Sayyaf Islamist group in Mindanao, The Philippines, used the tactic of severing heads as a means of terrorizing the security forces.

Americans should also remember Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who was brutally murdered in the same way in Pakistan over two years ago.

Although head-chopping is now seen as a mode of communication between Islamist militants and the Western world, the overwhelming victims have been Muslims.

Mankind has a natural propensity to become used to the worst atrocities and factor in the cruelest facts of life. But the sight of a severed head will continue to shock even the most blasé of the cynics. This is why those who are defying the whole of humanity in this war on terrorism are certain to continue to employ people like Momo le Nain.​
 

ACougar

U.S. Army Retired
Feb 7, 2003
16,795
1,295
Arizona
Visit site
✟37,952.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The west pretty much stoped beheading people about 75 years ago, and 75 years isn't really that long for a practice that has been going on for thousands of years. Nor should we be so certain that it is less humane than the electric chair or hanging, all we really know is it's less messy.

Historical background said:
Beheading with a sword or axe goes back a very long way in history, because like hanging, it was a cheap and practical method of execution in early times when a sword or an axe was always readily available.
The Greeks and the Romans considered beheading a less dishonourable (and less painful) form of execution than other methods in use at the time. The Roman Empire used beheading for its own citizens whilst crucifying others.
Beheading was widely used in Europe and Asia until the 20th century, but now is confined to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Yemen and Iran. Saudi Arabia publicly beheaded 52 men and 1 woman for murder, rape, sodomy and drug offences in 2003. (See Saudi Arabia below). One man was beheaded in Iran – the first for many years.
Beheading was used in Britain up to 1747 (see below) and was the standard method in Norway (abolished 1905), Sweden (up to 1903), Denmark and Holland (abolished 1870), and was used for some classes of prisoner in France (up until the introduction of the guillotine in 1792) and in Germany up to 1938.
China also used it widely, until the communists came to power and replaced it with shooting in the twentieth century. Japan too used beheading up to the end of the nineteenth century prior to turning to hanging.


http://www.richard.clark32.btinternet.co.uk/behead.html
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ACougar

U.S. Army Retired
Feb 7, 2003
16,795
1,295
Arizona
Visit site
✟37,952.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Nowhere did I imply that beheading is moraly justified, in fact I have often argued against the death penalty. Except in self defence, there is no justification for the taking of life.


Pious Jedi said:
Cougar,

If beheading is morally justified, why don't you advocate the beheading of our enemies? Why don't you offer them your head?
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,918
Vancouver
✟155,006.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
ACougar said:
Nowhere did I imply that beheading is moraly justified, in fact I have often argued against the death penalty. Except in self defence, there is no justification for the taking of life.
First you make excuses for people doing it. then you argue against it. Why?
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,271
6,959
72
St. Louis, MO.
✟373,791.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
TheRealityOfMan said:
I'd prefer a quicky with Madame Guillotine than a love-you-long-time with Mrs. Knife. A quick, painless decapitation happens on the guillotine rather than the American guy who had his head sawn off slowly and in agony.
Supposedly, when Louis XVI was on the guillotine, the blade got caught in his mandible, and didn't sever his head. The executioner had to push down on the blade with all his weight to complete the process. Not a pretty sight. Or so the story goes.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ACougar

U.S. Army Retired
Feb 7, 2003
16,795
1,295
Arizona
Visit site
✟37,952.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
solomon said:
First you make excuses for people doing it. then you argue against it. Why?
First, I do not believe in the Death penalty. No moral country performs executions. We jail people to protect the people from criminals and perhaps even to rehabilitate them, it is not our place to punish. So my stand against all executions remains firm.

Second, if your going to kill somebody the mannor in which you execute them pales in comparison to the fact that you are killing them for vengance, politics, economic security, or whatever other reason you utilize to justify killing that person. Civilized methods of execution do more to reduce the trauma for the executors than the executed IMO.

Let me put it this way, would you rather have 10 friends killed by lethal injection or 9 by beheading? The method of execution IMO is just shy of irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,918
Vancouver
✟155,006.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Whether or not capital punishment is moral or immoral, I personally would prefer friends and family killed privately by the state by lethal injection than to have their heads cut off as a public spectacle, and then placed on the gateposts of the city, or mailed to me.

The guillotine itself was developed as a humane form of execution. there is just something about human heads rolling into the feet of a jeering crowd though, that makes the name "Reign of Terror" so apt for that period of French history.
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
13,624
2,674
London, UK
✟822,987.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I do not rule out the possibility that in certain circumstances beheading someone might be the right thing to do e.g. in a war, or as a result of due process of justice.

My objection to the many examples of Islamic extremist beheadings would be to the purpose they served. They used the name of their god to justify crimes on Prisoners of war, or to decapitate those who shared their faith even yet not exactly as they themselves understood it. I do not believe that many of the examples cited in that article are remotely just even if one took the Koran as ones authority here as the executioners do or did.

I think that beheading a mass murderer such as an Al Qaida terrorist might be an appropriate punishment given that they themselves had attempted or even succeeded in serving out such sentences on others in a merciless fashion. Biblically I believe Rom 13 v 1-7 allows for this.

We live in a brutal world and we all await a Judgment Day where God will judge us all. For those of us who do not love Him that day will not mean life imprisonment but rather eternal banishment from his presence and all the good things that flow from that. May God have mercy on those who love Him, who turn or have turned to Him with repentant hearts - as for the rest may they fry in hell - beheadings too good for them!
 
Upvote 0

rahma

FUNdamentalist
Jan 15, 2004
6,120
496
20
between a frozen wastelan and a wast desert
Visit site
✟16,435.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Sheikh `Atiya Saqr, former head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, adds:

"The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, urged Muslims to show good treatment to war captives; he said to his Companions: “Treat the prisoners of war kindly.” Relating how the Companions complied strictly with this order given by the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, one of the prisoners of Badr, Huzayr ibn Humayr, states: “I was with one of Ansari families, after being taken as captive.

Whenever they had lunch or dinner, they used to give me preference by providing me with bread while they’d eat only dates, in showing compliance with the Prophet’s order of treating prisoners well."

Another, Thumama ibn-Athal, was taken prisoner and brought to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, who said: “Be good to him in his captivity.” When the Prophet went home he instructed to collect whatever food there, and ordered it sent to the prisoner.


In light of the above-mentioned facts, it is crystal clear that Islam requires that prisoners of war, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, should be accorded with good treatment. There is nothing in the Sunnah (example) of the Prophet (saws) that would allow a prisoner of war or any captive to be used as a pawn. POWs may be ransomed, but if they cannot afford ransom, they were set free at the end of the war, but never killed.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums