FBI already has investigated Kavanaugh 6 times. It's not the FBI that confirms Judges, it's the Senate. You want the Senate and Senate only to investigate this, especially since no crime is involved.
And why are you dismissing these men? Is it really pure sexism?
I have not heard anyone of either party say that Judge Kavanaugh has been investigated six times by the F.B.I. But maybe you mean the F.B.I. has checked him out for earlier evaluations to be at lower justice positions. I don't know.
But even if the F.B.I. did check him for the Supreme Court nomination, this could have been before new and relevant things have come in. So, the new items need to be checked by an adequate investigative group. But I do not know of any group who has done on-the-ground investigation > just talking at a hearing is not all there is to investigating allegations of a crime.
You say no crimes are involved.
It is a crime to assault a woman, and it is a crime to falsely accuse a Supreme Court candidate. So, in this situation, at least one significant crime has been done. By the way, in case Judge Kavanaugh has lied by saying he never assaulted Christine, he has made a false statement in the process of a federal determination about if he is suitable to be a Supreme Court justice. Plus, if he has lied by saying he never has been under the influence of alcohol and he is lying in order to cover up what could effect a hearing about his suitability to be a Supreme Justice, this would mean he is interfering with a federal jurisdiction investigation, by helping to provide and promote false information.
Even if he were to lie while not under oath, if he is giving false info which could influence the outcome of an impartial evaluation of his qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice, this would be interfering with and attempting to mislead a federal investigation, and it would be an F.B.I. jurisdiction crime.
And, of course, if Christine is accused of lying, this also is a major crime for her to do if she has been doing this. If she is lying, she is trying to do something which is illegal and which can effect the whole country in a bad way. So, this could be a federal level crime which would be under F.B.I. jurisdiction. And yes high-level political leaders of the United States have indeed accused her of lying.
Therefore, both candidates have been accused of crimes which would have an impact on the federal level operation of the United States of America; but as of earlier this morning the media shows that the F.B.I. has not investigated any of these accusations.
So, she has a right to a fair trial with full review of evidence, while being presumed innocent. A right, by the way, is not a threat; yet, I understand there are people who use a fair trial in order to threaten people into confessing to crimes or backing down from evaluation.
And in case you decide those two men are making things up, this would mean they are obstructing justice at a federal level, and conspiring to interfere with federal-level government function of reliably and impartially evaluating a candidate for Supreme Court justice. So, this would be a federal-level crime, too, under F.B.I. jurisdiction, too.
So, if I may ask, what do you mean by saying no crimes are involved in this?