Bill Maher calls Supreme Court pick a *&@#* ing Nut

[eastcoast_bsc]

The attacks are on in full force. Bill Maher called Judge Amy Barrett a bleeping nut who speaks in tongues . Real classless even for Bill Maher.


Maher rips Barrett, Trump's expected Supreme Court pick: 'She's a f---ing nut'

 

[Gnarwhal]

No surprise coming from him. Dude's an ardent liberal atheist, she's his antithesis. I'm definitely adding her and her family to my prayers because they're about to experience evil and unjust treatment that nobody should ever have to endure at the hands of the liberal scum and villainy.

 

[eastcoast_bsc]

No surprise coming from him. Dude's an ardent liberal atheist, she's his antithesis. I'm definitely adding her and her family to my prayers because they're about to experience evil and unjust treatment that nobody should ever have to endure at the hands of the liberal scum and villainy.

If we were in the times of Ancient Rome they would rush at here with daggers and swords.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

“Trump has appointed a quarter of the entire federal bench and -- unlike his wives -- that's for life.”

That was pretty funny , also true.

 

[thecolorsblend]

No surprise coming from him. Dude's an ardent liberal atheist, she's his antithesis. I'm definitely adding her and her family to my prayers because they're about to experience evil and unjust treatment that nobody should ever have to endure at the hands of the liberal scum and villainy.

I get the idea from Lindsey Graham's comments that they're not permitting Democrats to launch another inquisition. It looks like Senate Republicans learned their lesson from Kavanaugh and seem to want to quickly confirm Barrett. I guess that means bypassing a lot of the usual procedures involved in confirming a new Justice. I'm fine with that.

As a word of caution tho, I would like to remind all of you that a human is being nominated to the SCOTUS. I'm as pro-life as the next guy but we would do well to not pin all our hopes on one Justice.

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

I'm as pro-life as the next guy but we would do well to not pin all our hopes on one Justice.

Or any justice. They are not there to change the law.

 

[royal priest]

Or any justice. They are not there to change the law.

If only the Senate would remind them of this.

 

[royal priest]

we would do well to not pin all our hopes on one Justice.

Agreed, except the expediency of filling that seat might actually determine the re-election of the current POTUS.

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

“Trump has appointed a quarter of the entire federal bench and -- unlike his wives -- that's for life.”

That was pretty funny , also true.

Liberals have to make everything personal...

 

[thecolorsblend]

Agreed, except the expediency of filling that seat might actually determine the re-election of the current POTUS.

Agreed. If Barrett (or whoever) gets confirmed before the election, I predict the left will have a lot of wind taken out of their sails.

 

[paul1149]

The Pubs seem to be lining up behind the nominee. Even Murkowski has greatly softened her original position, and Romney is on board. As long as the nominee is qualified, and I have no doubts she will be, this will be a go. No repeat of the Kavanaugh inquisition will be allowed. And what can the Dems do? They can't get too anti-Catholic, because Biden's over there pretending to be a faithful Catholic. It's also unlikely they can pin serial gang rape on her. The latest charge seems to be she's racist because she adopted two black children? Maher is a jerk who gets it right about once every two weeks. This was not one of those times.

 

[A_Thinker]

Agreed. If Barrett (or whoever) gets confirmed before the election, I predict the left will have a lot of wind taken out of their sails.

... or vice versa ...

 

[eastcoast_bsc]

I get the idea from Lindsey Graham's comments that they're not permitting Democrats to launch another inquisition. It looks like Senate Republicans learned their lesson from Kavanaugh and seem to want to quickly confirm Barrett. I guess that means bypassing a lot of the usual procedures involved in confirming a new Justice. I'm fine with that.

As a word of caution tho, I would like to remind all of you that a human is being nominated to the SCOTUS. I'm as pro-life as the next guy but we would do well to not pin all our hopes on one Justice.

I agree . Let us remember Justice Souter. Didn’t quite work out the way we thought he would.

But that being said I believe Justice Barrett will be a solid ally people of faith.

 

[thecolorsblend]

I agree . Let us remember Justice Souter. Didn’t quite work out the way we thought he would.

But that being said I believe Justice Barrett will be a solid ally people of faith.

I am not a single issue voter. But protecting the unborn is in my top three most important issues. I can compromise on certain other things. But not that. It would be incredible to think that someone as committed to the faith as Barrett seems to be wouldn't be on the side of the unborn as well. But stranger things have happened.

Anyway, it's official, Barrett has been nominated by President Trump. The clock is ticking now.

 

[RushMAN]

Agreed. If Barrett (or whoever) gets confirmed before the election, I predict the left will have a lot of wind taken out of their sails.

Than I will pray like mad that good triumphs and she is confirmed

 

[thecolorsblend]

Than I will pray like mad that good triumphs and she is confirmed

I already put in a call to my (Republican) Senators and told them that I'm sure they're onboard with Barrett... but, just in case, I'll be paying close attention to how they vote.

The interns (or whoever) I spoke to said the Senators were all-in on supporting whoever President Trump appoints (at the time, it wasn't known who it would be for sure).

Perhaps you could do the same thing with your Senators?

 

[RushMAN]

mine are all Dems

 

[thecolorsblend]

mine are all Dems

Then call them and say "We need to come together and do what's best for the country, all this division harms our democracy".

Pointless? Maybe. But anything that gums up the works even a little bit is worth doing. If American Catholics picked an issue (such as abortion) and simultaneously all committed one small (but legal and non-violent!) act of defiance per day, the system would eventually ground to a stop. Literally the one thing the left has gotten right is resistance. They have no idea what they're doing or how best to do it. But they've got the right basic idea in resisting

There's no reason we can't do the same and turn their tactics against them.

 

[RushMAN]

Then call them and say "We need to come together and do what's best for the country, all this division harms our democracy".

Right now where I am at I couldn't do that I believe liberalism is what is wrong with the world and has harmed the USA. Right now I can't stand liberalism. At this moment I feel like Ankin at the moment Obi Wan won the fight (Hope you understand because I can't elaborate here). Found a better picture that represents my feelings toward liberals