- Oct 29, 2017
- 54,684
- 8,037
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
To your first question, you tell me. For your next sentence, can you put it in another way? Perhaps it's my language skills but I can't quite understand the point you are trying to make. You talk about the number of undetected crossings (let's call this X amount), to those who are caught (overall? Let's call this Y) and compare that ratio (X to Y) to the ratio of ii's caught (what is this ratio in comparison to the X to Y ratio? Let's call this Z ratio) and ratio of terrorists caught (let's call this W ratio). So what exactly is the comparison here that makes sense? For W ratio to mean anything, we would have to know the total number of terrorists that tried to cross Vs those who were caught. Do you have that number? I'm sorry, I'm an engineer by education and the math logic here bothers me because I can't see how it works.
But in the end, they did get caught, didn't they? So again, the law enforcement seems to be doing a good enough job in catching the terrorists. Doesn't seem like an example to support your point.
Oh my...
A = Illegal crossings captured.
B = Estimated illegal crossings uncaptured.
C = Captured terrorist crossings
D = Estimated terrorist crossings.
X = Factor for undetected terrorists, as they are highly trained to not be detected.
To solve for D, multiply B by C; then take the product and divide by A.
Then multiply D by X to get a realistic estimation.
What kind of engineering do you do?
Upvote
0