Biden Admin Names Levine, a Man, the 'First-Ever Female Four-Star Admiral' in Public Health Corps

[RDKirk]

Remind us what the science says about people with gender dysphoria? Because last I heard the studies support their brain structure being closer to the gender they identify with then the gender their bodies are. To dismiss this and try to claim they are "confused" or "not following the laws of science" is to miss the point completely and minimize the very real suffering their condition causes.

The experts who study this say the science supports what they claim.

But wait...but wait...but wait.

Feminists tell us that there is no difference between the structures of male brains and female brains. So how can the structure of male brains with gender dysphoria be closer to the structure of female brains when there is no difference in structure between male brains and female brains?

Are we following feminist science or transsexual science?

 

[Hammster]

Sparing your oversimplification of the matter… One is medically recognized and the other is not.

You understand a woman is still the same species as a man, correct?

Let’s run with the species thing. What’s the difference between a man who thinks he’s a woman and a man who thinks he’s a five year old girl?

 

[Belk]

But wait...but wait...but wait.

Feminists tell us that there is no difference between the structures of male brains and female brains.

They do? Ok, they are wrong.

So how can the structure of male brains with gender dysphoria be closer to the structure of female brains when there is no difference in structure between male brains and female brains?

Are we following feminist science or transsexual science?

Science does not (or should not if done correctly) change depending on the preceding noun. There is just science not different flavors.

 

[RDKirk]

Science does not (or should not if done correctly) change depending on the preceding noun. There is just science not different flavors.

That's what you say. And despite my agreement, neither one of us is holding the microphone.

I just watched a video on YouTube where pop-science celebrity Neil deGrasse Tyson arguing that whatever differences there may be between males and females are irrelevant with regard to transsexuals. He asserted that science should be suppressed if there might be a legislative response to it.

 

[Albion]

Maybe he needs a better example. One that’s grounded in reality and doesn’t dehumanize an actual condition people have.

Since it was said that a person cannot become a dog, the idea that someone was derhumanized is silly. The point is obvious--this is something that's impossible.

Would you have been mollified if he'd used as an example that a human cannot become a god?

Yet a person can be either male or female. You see the difference there, right?

A person becoming either male or female as he chooses was the issue.

 

[super animator]

But wait...but wait...but wait.

Feminists tell us that there is no difference between the structures of male brains and female brains.

The feminists who spout said rhetoric are on average identify themselves as Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.

 

[Blade]

Don't you think that maybe something demonic might be behind this? Lol I don't mean ever one but its not natural Yet tha thought that desire did not come from God but the enemy and once we listen to it.. it becomes ours. I don't know lol just watched a movie where the kid in school said what about her? She turns around says "I am not a her".

 

[RDKirk]

The feminists who spout said rhetoric are on average identify themselves as Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.

You say that as though it were a bad thing.

 

[super animator]

You say that as though it were a bad thing.

They are consider to be the west baptist church equivalent for many people. Misandry is not uncommon with them.

 

[RDKirk]

They are consider to be the west baptist church equivalent for many people. Misandry is not uncommon with them.

The specific belief that a transwoman should not be considered a woman in all aspects is not limited to radical feminists.

"Traditional women" who would never claim to be feminists also believe a transwoman should not be considered a woman in all aspects. There aren't any traditional women who would accept Levine as the "first woman" in that office.

Lesbians in general do not believe transwomen are women in all aspects.

There are even transwomen who don't go that far, and hopefully Levine does not, either.

 

[super animator]

The specific belief that a transwoman should not be considered a woman in all aspects is not limited to radical feminists.

"Traditional women" who would never claim to be feminists also believe a transwoman should not be considered a woman in all aspects. There aren't any traditional women who would accept Levine as the "first woman" in that office.

Lesbians in general do not believe transwomen are women in all aspects.

There are even transwomen who don't go that far, and hopefully Levine does not, either.

...Did you miss the "Misandry is not uncommon with them" part of my comment?

 

[bekkilyn]

So when an actual women becomes a four star admiral in public health, would she get any recognition at all for being a first, or would a woman even be considered for it in the first place since men can just be everything?

 

[bekkilyn]

But wait...but wait...but wait.

Feminists tell us that there is no difference between the structures of male brains and female brains. So how can the structure of male brains with gender dysphoria be closer to the structure of female brains when there is no difference in structure between male brains and female brains?

Are we following feminist science or transsexual science?

Does that mean that females with "male brains" are superior to males with "female brains"? Can we just identify into whatever brain type we want on any given day?

 

[bekkilyn]

Yes, we help them. Thankfully there’s some sanity from the left.

Yes, validating the delusions that men can be women and women can be men is harmful not helpful.

 

[bekkilyn]

The feminists who spout said rhetoric are on average identify themselves as Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.

No, feminists do *NOT* self-identify as "TERFs". That's a derogatory label that the trans-radicals and their lib-fem allies call EVERY woman (and man and even other trans people) who believe that biology is real.

 

[bekkilyn]

Don't you think that maybe something demonic might be behind this? Lol I don't mean ever one but its not natural Yet tha thought that desire did not come from God but the enemy and once we listen to it.. it becomes ours. I don't know lol just watched a movie where the kid in school said what about her? She turns around says "I am not a her".

You know, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if there was something demonic behind it all because how can so many people be deluded over something so biologically basic, without even the need to argue ethics or morality? Do we have trouble figuring out if a horse is male or female? No, we do not. And there should equally be no trouble figuring out if a human (also a mammal) is male or female.

 

[bekkilyn]

They are consider to be the west baptist church equivalent for many people. Misandry is not uncommon with them.

This is false. Yes, there are some feminists who hate men, but "TERF" is a term made up by trans-radicals to justify their violence and contempt for women in general. Have you seen some of the things that they've said about what they believe that "TERFs" deserve and what they want/plan to do to them? It's some of the most vile, evil, and vicious things that couldn't be posted here on CF and is enough to make a sane person sickened.

 

[Landon Caeli]

Do we have trouble figuring out if a horse is male or female? No, we do not. And there should equally be no trouble figuring out if a human (also a mammal) is male or female.

What we don't know however, is whether the horse self-identifies as male or female.

 

[Aldebaran]

You know, at this point I wouldn't be surprised if there was something demonic behind it all because how can so many people be deluded over something so biologically basic, without even the need to argue ethics or morality? Do we have trouble figuring out if a horse is male or female? No, we do not. And there should equally be no trouble figuring out if a human (also a mammal) is male or female.

There's no trouble at all, but that's why they want to add some confusion--even on their birth certificate:

"New Jersey residents and those born in the Garden State will soon have the choice of selecting a gender-neutral option on their birth certificates.

The new law goes into effect Friday, and will include three birth certificate gender options: "female, male, or undesignated/nonbinary," according to the law's text.

The Babs Siperstein Law, as the legislation is called, is named after the lifelong N.J. resident and first transgender person to become a member of the Democratic National Committee, where she served until 2017."

 

[bekkilyn]

There's no trouble at all, but that's why they want to add some confusion--even on their birth certificate:

"New Jersey residents and those born in the Garden State will soon have the choice of selecting a gender-neutral option on their birth certificates.

The new law goes into effect Friday, and will include three birth certificate gender options: "female, male, or undesignated/nonbinary," according to the law's text.

The Babs Siperstein Law, as the legislation is called, is named after the lifelong N.J. resident and first transgender person to become a member of the Democratic National Committee, where she served until 2017."

How do people not see the major problems with this?