No.Also did you watch the 911 call I posted what if that man had a wife and kids in the house and was unarmed a lot can happen in 12 minutes before police arrived the man had already been attacked before police for there
Now what about those who live far from town like me as a man is it not my duty to provided protection for my family
Why is it counted by some that on my heart was put to be a protector to be a bad thing
Did you see the artical I posted where a man with ar15 type rifle pistol and plate carrier walked into walmart here in Missouri no one got hurt why
A ARMED civilian pulled his pistol and kept the would be shooter until LEO's arrived later because like I keep saying laws are for punishment of those who break it and generally LEO's are only for after the fact as they have to be told where to go then have to get there many times by the time LEOs get there the crime is already committed
No.
I was a police dispatcher.
I've had a gun brandished toward me, more than once. I didn't need to be schooled by someone else's experience.
No.
I was a police dispatcher.
I've had a gun brandished toward me, more than once. I didn't need to be schooled by someone else's experience.
That's the one that they absolutely will not answer.
I watched both videos.It litteraly a 911 call no intro really black screen with white words of whats being said during the call how can you preach more gun control but wont look at everything
I think it odd that anyone, regardless of where they're from, would be opposed to background checks on gun sales, a system to check ownership of a gun (just like the truck in your anecdote), and mechanisms for removing weapons from those who prove themselves irresponsible.And for someone so ingrained in LEO culture you sure have a odd view maybe Missouri LEO's are different
I've been pulled over before (just bought a truck had no plates for it yet) he asked if I had any firearms I said yes my Bushmaster xm15 and my glock he took one out of chamber of both put it back in magazine ran numbers to make sure not stolen then told me its my right to have it no issues and wait until he leaves to put one back in chamber also had 4 extra 30rd mags loaded I carry with my loaded bushmaster
My point is where I'm at most LEO not only don't mind civilians with guns they promote it AND many sheriff departments here already stated they will NOT in force more gun control
I think it odd that anyone, regardless of where they're from, would be opposed to background checks on gun sales, a system to check ownership of a gun (just like the truck in your anecdote), and mechanisms for removing weapons from those who prove themselves irresponsible.
Again, I'm not anti-gun. otoh, in my opinion, not everyone should be allowed have them.
Thank you now if the man had a wife kids and was unarmed do you not see how bad it could of been
Then by all means, let's remove all restrictions on pharmaceuticals.. we can't stop it, so we must do nothing at all.I mean look at the war on drugs perfect example and drugs are 100% illegal to those who don't have a script from a doctor yet ain't we the nation with one of the highest drug use rates
So then when my state in acts sb367 which null and voids NFA you will leave us alone because we decided?
What I don't get is a mentality that insists on all or nothing. If a regulation is not 100% effective - then do nothing.
That happens because people don't teach their kids I was raised around loaded firearms out in the open me or my 2 brothers never had a issue why because my dad had a rule you can see and hold any firearm any time just go get him he will unload it and hand it to you after 2 or 3 times of this I never was curious because my dad took that away by making it advalable its simple child thought process you make somthing a no no kids 2ill wonder why my dad also from a early age explained the dangers if what a firearm can do when not correctly used its common sense people in very happy you have been able to never need a firearm however as I posted early not everyone is as lucky as you and I pose the same question to you
People go to the bathroom in toilets all over but they never poop DIRECTLY into the water treatment pools.
You will never have perfect compliance with any law guy.The fact is though some still do drive without a licence
Then by all means, let's remove all restrictions on pharmaceuticals.. we can't stop it, so we must do nothing at all.
What I don't get is a mentality that insists on all or nothing. If a regulation is not 100% effective - then do nothing.
That's your hypothetical question in a nut-shell btw, Do nothing or kill with a firearm. As-if there are no alternatives, ever.
I don't understand it.
You’re dad taught you how to act around firearms - that’s great.
Did he or anybody else teach you to use proper punctuation when writing a sentence? I would imagine that somebody along the way did, yet your writing is nearly devoid of punctuation and borders on unintelligible because of it.
I say that not to flame, but to illustrate the fact that, sometimes, people don’t use what they’ve been taught even when it’s in their best interest to do so. “its common sense people”
lol. I have no idea how that response is at all relevant, but I’m still glad I read it.
I was at work so I did not have time, everyone but you seems to be able to read it thought friend.