"Booth, According to Isa. 44:24 God was unaccompanied at the original creation. "
I agree, because the three are one. Funny how your interpreation of this verse also doesn't explain John chapter 1 nor does it explain why the expression God uses in gen is plural. I'd say its because you're wrong.
thanks for strenghening the case for trinity though.
"Jesaiah - exam John 1:1-14 and compare it to verses in 1 John. Johns first epistle will shed an incredible amount of light on John chapter 1. "
can you cite some books that place 1 john before John?
"take a look at the Hebrew passages first Booth so you can have the proper frame of mind. "
I have and it affirms trinity.
"Through a Son, whom he made heir of all things and through whom he created the Messianic age to come." "
I'd disagree. You need to put in what it ways. Through Christ was made all eternity. That's a correct reading. Christ made everything.
"Hebrews 1:2-3 does not mean that Jesus is the creator, or that the Father through Jesus created the universe. It means that God through Jesus sacrifice on the cross has opened up a way for us to enter the New Earth and New Heavens of the Messianic kingdom when it comes in the future. This is how the age to come is created through Jesus. Notice also that the age to come is created through him (his death) not by him. "
that may be your OPINION, but it certainly doesn't fit the context of the passage. What's really clinching is chapter 1. "God also testifed to it by signs, wonders and various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will." Christ made it clear that he send the HS and in other sections said God sent the HS. Solution: Christ is God. Or do you think the bible is wrong in places?
"This is now in agreement with Hebrews 1:2. If not we have a massive contradiction.
"
no, its not a contradiction at all since he was addressing the end times. not the beginning.
"This is the context that Johns gospel must be read in. "
LOL. Are you serious? The context of a letter is set in the beginning, not the end. Sorry, you're wayyy off on this one. So you read the last page of a book to get the context? No. You read the first few pages for character introduction and clarification on plot beginnings. This is why John made it clear in the beginning that Christ was God.
"Someone educated in one of these philosophies would interpret John 1: 1 in the following manner. In the beginning was the divine principle of life, the divine principle of life was with God, and the divine principle of life was God. Verse 14. The divine principle of life became flesh. "
*sigh* I've studied these among other definations of the word Logos in that time period. the defiation "the inward thought which is expressed in the spoken word. " Fits quite nicely. Christ was God's physical representation of his Word, which, is divine. If you look at the context of the passage you will see that it proves Christ is divine, thus God. This is the reason for the verse "and the word dwelt among us and became flesh" (paraphrase). God's plan was realized through Christ who was God. thus we have the complete meaning of the word Logos, Christ is God's plan who is divine. IE Christ is God.
"If John was really trying to say that Jesus is God, he would simply have written; in the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with God, and Jesus was God. "
and here you take the cultural context out of it. they people of the time would understand exact what John was saying, as I have explained it to you. He made it quite simple you see. Christ is God's plan who is divine. This is what Logos is. Then he makes the reference to being God and with God. This is also why Christ says, if you have seen me you have seen the father, and I and the father are one. It is also why col says he was the full physical representation of God. Thus making him, as the old saying goes, God with flesh on.
thus our conclusion must be that Christ is God.