You are incorrect. You are just mixing up the order of what I said. Look...
I answered...
Yes I did as shown above, and I then asked you another question.
I just didn't split up my post by posting a huge quote in the middle of it.
Sure...
twist....
Arguement finished...
Saint_George
MikeMck said:The problem comes when you pray to the dead so that they will pray for you.
You say that this is an "orthodox practice of Christianity". If this is true, why isn't it found anywhere in scripture?
I answered...
Saint_George said:Sometimes Fundamentalists object to asking our fellow Christians in heaven to pray for us by declaring that God has forbidden contact with the dead in passages such as Deuteronomy 18:1011. In fact, he has not, because he at times has given itfor example, when he had Moses and Elijah appear with Christ to the disciples on the Mount of Transfiguration (Matt. 17:3). What God has forbidden is necromantic practice of conjuring up spirits. "There shall not be found among you any one who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, any one who practices divination, a soothsayer, or an augur, or a sorcerer, or a charmer, or a medium, or a wizard, or a necromancer. . . . For these nations, which you are about to dispossess, give heed to soothsayers and to diviners; but as for you, the Lord your God has not allowed you so to do. The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brethrenhim you shall heed" (Deut. 18:1015).
God thus indicates that one is not to conjure the dead for purposes of gaining information; one is to look to Gods prophets instead. Thus one is not to hold a seance. But anyone with an ounce of common sense can discern the vast qualitative difference between holding a seance to have the dead speak through you and a son humbly saying at his mothers grave, "Mom, please pray to Jesus for me; Im having a real problem right now." The difference between the two is the difference between night and day. One is an occult practice bent on getting secret information; the other is a humble request for a loved one to pray to God on ones behalf.
MikeMck said:So, clearly, as can be seen in your own post, #86, you did not answer the question but, instead, did attempt to distract from your lack of ability to answer the question by asking another, completely unrelated question.
Yes I did as shown above, and I then asked you another question.
You say my doctrine is unbiblical, I said your denomination is unbiblical. Those don't seem to be completely unrelated.Saint_George said:Why isn't sola scriptura found anywhere in scripture?
Don't try to demolish our belief claiming that it is not backed up biblicaly when the soul root of your faith is based on a non-biblical belief. You wouldn't have to ask these questions if you new anything about the Catholic faith.
I just didn't split up my post by posting a huge quote in the middle of it.
MikeMck said:Really? Can you please show me where I have twisted anyone's words?
Sure...
Saint_George said:You ask for an answer of a question and when it is given to you, you deny that the fact that it is an answer, and then try to prove it wrong with objects that don't even apply to the discussion.
twist....
MikeMck said:Actually, I just demonstrated that you did not answer.
Arguement finished...
Saint_George
Upvote
0