Appearance of Age and Evidence for Special Creation

[RickG]

That is one of the biggest lies that professional creationists like to spread. I would strongly suggest that you find new sources of information.

Its amazing how they can be shown that their source(s) are unreliable and deliberately misrepresenting what they are presenting, and still they ignore the fact.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The live fish that were found were indistinguishable from the fossil.
All else is immaterial.

Wrong again. Once more coelacanth are a whole order of fish. There is not just one. What you just said is on the same order as saying "humans are indistinguishable from lemurs". Both are primates. This is a good starting point:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth

Now the sites that you follow may not be able to tell the difference. That only makes it more obvious that they are not reliable resources.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Or it will be a final nail in evolution, proving that dinosaurs
are related only to dinosaurs.

What are you talking about? There are no, 0, nada, bupkis nails against the theory of evolution. To have a "final nail" implies that you have other nails.

 

[.Mikha'el.]

ON!

Thread closed permanently!

Flaming and Goading
● Please treat all members with respect and courtesy through civil dialogue.
● Do not personally attack other members or groups of members on CF. Address only the content of the post and not the poster.
● NO Goading. This includes images, cartoons, or smileys clearly meant to goad.
● Stating or implying that another Christian member, or group of members, are not Christian is not allowed.
● If you are flamed, do not respond in-kind. Alert staff to the situation by utilizing the report button.

OFF!