Appearance of Age and Evidence for Special Creation

[Loudmouth]

For your information ...

Psalm 138:2 I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.

Those would be the words of a man, not a deity.

 

[ScottA]

Make-believe would be your fantasies, and the world would be the world you have invented in your fantasy universe.

F for Fail.

"Make" means (in our present context) create or cause. "Believe" means believe. "World" means world: A created world to cause the world to believe.

But if you do not hear or understand yourself...how will you understand anything?

 

[bhsmte]

F for Fail.

"Make" means (in our present context) create or cause. "Believe" means believe. "World" means world: A created world to cause the world to believe.

But if you do not hear or understand yourself...how will you understand anything?

This created world you mention has 2/3 of its population not believing what you believe.

Why is that?

 

[ScottA]

This created world you mention has 2/3 of its population not believing what you believe.

Why is that?

So as to not be off topic I will answer in that context:

Because it is a process, and it includes the separation of those who do believe from those who do not.

 

[AV1611VET]

Those would be the words of a man, not a deity.

Does it matter to unbelievers?

Be they from God, as Christians say; an angel, as Joseph Smith said; or men, as unbelievers say ... does it matter?

 

[bhsmte]

So as to not be off topic I will answer in that context:

Because it is a process, and it includes the separation of those who do believe from those who do not.

Does that process include islam growing and christianity (especially in the united states) declining?

 

[ScottA]

Does that process include islam growing and christianity (especially in the united states) declining?

Yes, every incline and decline in history.

 

[bhsmte]

Yes, every incline and decline in history.

Good luck.

 

[USincognito]

I think that virtually every geneticist and palaeonlogist in the world would rejoice. For geneticists being able to sequence DNA from at least 65 million years ago (and still be able to be sequenced) and for palaeontologists yet another confirmation that birds descended from certain forms of dinosaurs.

Creationists go on and on with all sorts of claims about MOR-1125. You never hear them mention that the collagen fragments most closely resembled those of birds for some reason.

 

[pat34lee]

The entire article is a Gish gallop ranting falsehoods one after the other. Creation science doesn't even perform any original research which is the very basis of the scientific method. What hypothesis have they proposed, tested and verified? NONE. All they do is take science from the mainstream and misrepresent it. And that's their best work. Most of it is just plain made up garbage.

Opinion, bashing. Quote the part where they
are wrong.

 

[pat34lee]

No, it's not. You either did not read or did not understand the explanation given to you.

The live fish that were found were indistinguishable from the fossil.
All else is immaterial.

 

[pat34lee]

It does? Then you can provide examples of unfossilized dinosaur bones being found and we'll see what the reaction was.

Out of place artifacts. OOPARTs, or things that
shouldn't be where they were found, according
to the TOE.
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/forbidden-history-ooparts-out-of-place-artifacts/

 

[pat34lee]

I think that virtually every geneticist and palaeonlogist in the world would rejoice. For geneticists being able to sequence DNA from at least 65 million years ago (and still be able to be sequenced) and for palaeontologists yet another confirmation that birds descended from certain forms of dinosaurs.

Or it will be a final nail in evolution, proving that dinosaurs
are related only to dinosaurs.

 

[USincognito]

Out of place artifacts. OOPARTs, or things that
shouldn't be where they were found, according
to the TOE.
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/forbidden-history-ooparts-out-of-place-artifacts/

The fact that you're trying to change the subject to OOPARTs is a tacit admission that you have no examples of unfossilized dinosaur bones.

 

[RickG]

Opinion, bashing. Quote the part where they
are wrong.

Look up Gish gallop. Everything.

 

[bhsmte]

Or it will be a final nail in evolution, proving that dinosaurs
are related only to dinosaurs.

If you have the nail, show us.

 

[USincognito]

Or it will be a final nail in evolution, proving that dinosaurs
are related only to dinosaurs.

Unlikely, given that we have not only genetic evidence showing birds are closely related to living archosaurs (crocodilians), dino-bird transitional fossils and the collage fragments in MOR-1125 are most similar to that of birds. Keep your fingers crossed and your wishing thinking going though. Good luck with that.

 

[Loudmouth]

F for Fail.

"Make" means (in our present context) create or cause. "Believe" means believe. "World" means world: A created world to cause the world to believe.

But if you do not hear or understand yourself...how will you understand anything?

Make-believe: The action of pretending or imagining, typically that things are better than they really are: she’s living in a world of make-believe

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/make-believe

Even the Oxford dictionary describes a make-believe world as something that is imaginary. The F isn't mine.

 

[USincognito]

The live fish that were found were indistinguishable from the fossil.

To what are you referring? Coelacanths? The ones that are very different from older species?
Take this link and go to page 335.
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._a_review_of_molecular_and_morphological_data

 

[Loudmouth]

The live fish that were found were indistinguishable from the fossil.
All else is immaterial.

That is one of the biggest lies that professional creationists like to spread. I would strongly suggest that you find new sources of information.