Anyone care to DEFEND Trumps claims that he should have been given standing?

[perplexed]

As far as I tell there is only one case where standing is discussed and Trumps lawyers were beyond incompetent they were just plain nuts. It is very clear that Trump should not have been given standing

Microsoft Word - 20-2078 - Memo Op Final (courtlistener.com)

If I am wrong about this please let me know

 

[SkyWriting]

As far as I tell there is only one case where standing is discussed and Trumps lawyers were beyond incompetent they were just plain nuts. It is very clear that Trump should not have been given standing

Microsoft Word - 20-2078 - Memo Op Final (courtlistener.com)

If I am wrong about this please let me know

He was invited to speak if that's what you mean.

 

[perplexed]

I think you are talking about the impeachment trial. I am not talking about that.
I have provided a link to the court case it is deeply troubling, Trump should have said my lawyers are incompetent instead of complaining he was not given standing

 

[rambot]

I think you are talking about the impeachment trial. I am not talking about that.
I have provided a link to the court case it is deeply troubling, Trump should have said my lawyers are incompetent instead of complaining he was not given standing

Being ignorant of law, how would competent lawyers have handled it all? And how would competent lawyers been able to WIN the case?

It seemed that, at one point, Trump had at least kind of a decent legal team after the election. And then a bunch of firms began to say "adios". Were those firms considered competent by many?

 

[perplexed]

I am deeply upset by this, as far as I can tell trump could not find competent lawyers to try and overturn the election results because there is not solid evidence of massive fraud so he got crazy ones. Trump falsely accused the lawyers who did not take cases of cowardice . Trump also falsely accused the judges that threw out the crazy cases of incompetence. And many people on this board believe Trumps crazy accusations

 

[Arcangl86]

Being ignorant of law, how would competent lawyers have handled it all? And how would competent lawyers been able to WIN the case?

It seemed that, at one point, Trump had at least kind of a decent legal team after the election. And then a bunch of firms began to say "adios". Were those firms considered competent by many?

Competent lawyers would have withdrawn from the case like some of the original lawyers did. It was unwinnable.

 

[returntosender]

I thought they did an impressive job today. What "standing" means I don't know and I don't care to read the link.

 

[Taodeching]

Standing, or locus standi, is capacity of a party to bring suit in court.

Standing

 

[Ceallaigh]

I am deeply upset by this, as far as I can tell trump could not find competent lawyers to try and overturn the election results because there is not solid evidence of massive fraud so he got crazy ones. Trump falsely accused the lawyers who did not take cases of cowardice . Trump also falsely accused the judges that threw out the crazy cases of incompetence. And many people on this board believe Trumps crazy accusations

Could you please elaborate regarding in what way the lawyers involved are incompetent and crazy? For instance do they have any official complaints or reprimands made against them on their records, to document that they are incompetent and crazy?

 

[perplexed]

Could you please elaborate regarding in what way the lawyers involved are incompetent and crazy? For instance do they have any official complaints or reprimands made against them on their records, to document that they are incompetent and crazy?

??? Have you read the link, The judge says nobody has ever asked to do something so extreme as to ask for ALL the votes to be overturned before, it would be OK if extensive evidence was provided and the injury was NOT two (2) people did not get their votes counted.

 

[Ceallaigh]

??? Have you read the link, The judge says nobody has done something so extreme as to ask for ALL the votes to be overturned before, it would be OK if extensive evidence was provided and overturning the entire election was a remedy for the injury in question, of 2 people did not have their votes counted.

No I'm afraid I didn't read the 37 page court document. If that's what's required to discuss this, I'm not sure how many you'll find willing to do that.

 

[perplexed]

you can just skim through it does not take long at all to skim through something