Given the strong culture of leukophobia among the press in the USA, I think it's a fair sentiment to say anti-whiteness is a problem. Stuff like this is symptomatic.
What do you think of them simultaneously telling whites to make their population decline by having fewer children, then telling them they need to import non-whites to make up for the population decline?About what?
I feel like I'm missing something here.
What do you think of them simultaneously telling whites to make their population decline by having fewer children, then telling them they need to import non-whites to make up for the population decline?
What do you think of them simultaneously telling whites to make their population decline by having fewer children, then telling them they need to import non-whites to make up for the population decline?
The fact that you are making it all about colour is noted.What do you think of them simultaneously telling whites to make their population decline by having fewer children, then telling them they need to import non-whites to make up for the population decline?
What do you think? I think a fair assessment leads to the inevitable conclusion that there is a strong anti-white sentiment in the Guardian.
Given the strong culture of leukophobia among the press in the USA, I think it's a fair sentiment to say anti-whiteness is a problem. Stuff like this is symptomatic.
What do you think of them simultaneously telling whites to make their population decline by having fewer children, then telling them they need to import non-whites to make up for the population decline?
What do you think? I think a fair assessment leads to the inevitable conclusion that there is a strong anti-white sentiment in the Guardian.
Given the strong culture of leukophobia among the press in the USA, I think it's a fair sentiment to say anti-whiteness is a problem. Stuff like this is symptomatic.
No one seems to be telling Somali immigrants to help the earth by having fewer children. Our society, in general, seems to tend towards "that's so cute!" when it comes to large immigrant families, especially if they're Muslim, and on the other hand "that's so irresponsible!" when Middle class White, Christian families do the same. I've just noticed that.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any specific examples or statistics to substantiate your claim? I ask because I've never heard of such a thing. As a Christian mother of eight children myself, I've never been told in all the 20+ years of being a mother that it's irresponsible of me and my husband to have this many children. We've always been encouraged and admired for having a large family. Admittedly, I have heard people criticizing the Duggar family, but then again I do think having 20 children is a bit excessive. However, I'm not at all impressed with their ranting on and on about Christian values and morality, considering the intentional cover-up of the sexual scandals by their oldest son Josh, in an attempt to protect him from prosecution for being a perpetual sexual predator of young girls.
I do. I work with and for various Somali immigrant families. Four and five kids are common, and I've met a gentleman with seven kids. Society's response is generally accommodating and patient.
Our society, or theirs?
From what I've seen, ours.
Disclaimer; these families are precious and dear, and I'm not putting them down for being immigrants, or having lots of kids.
What I have seen is that large Muslim families immigrating from abroad get a good deal of help from the government in the form of food stamps and housing assistance. Their large families are treated as multi-cultural assets by public schools, and many of the adults work with me.
I have observed my Mennonite friends with similarly large families who do not rely on government assistance being accosted in public for being "irresponsible" and "ecologically selfish" for having more than two or three kids. I have heard jabs that suggest these women ought not to have so many kids.
The standard from what I have observed is not the same.