Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties

[Pavel Mosko]

I'm looking into what Russel Brand claims in his latest video
"A new investigation reports that Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties from pharma companies."

He however can often say stuff against the TOS so won't bother linking but googling some stories that he probably is using as source material.


NIH scientists received estimated $350 million in royalties since 2009: Report

The medical “research” RACKET: $350 million in royalties was secretly paid to NIH scientists, including Fauci

Fauci, Collins Shared In ‘Secret’ NIH ‘Royalties’ Totaling $350M: Watchdog Report | The Daily Wire


It turns out this was Brand's original source

Substack Investigation: Faucis Royalties And The $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN By NIH

 

[Tom 1]

I'm looking into what Russel Brand claims in his latest video
"A new investigation reports that Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties from pharma companies."

He however can often say stuff against the TOS so won't bother linking but googling some stories that he probably is using as source material.


NIH scientists received estimated $350 million in royalties since 2009: Report

The medical “research” RACKET: $350 million in royalties was secretly paid to NIH scientists, including Fauci

Fauci, Collins Shared In ‘Secret’ NIH ‘Royalties’ Totaling $350M: Watchdog Report | The Daily Wire

Report: Fauci and NIH Scientists Were Recipients of Approximately $350 Million in “Royalties” from 2009 to 2020

That’s a lot of money to hide under the mattress.

 

[dqhall]

I'm looking into what Russel Brand claims in his latest video
"A new investigation reports that Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties from pharma companies."

He however can often say stuff against the TOS so won't bother linking but googling some stories that he probably is using as source material.


NIH scientists received estimated $350 million in royalties since 2009: Report

The medical “research” RACKET: $350 million in royalties was secretly paid to NIH scientists, including Fauci

Fauci, Collins Shared In ‘Secret’ NIH ‘Royalties’ Totaling $350M: Watchdog Report | The Daily Wire

Do they take and hide income tax receipts too?

 

[Maria Billingsley]

I'm looking into what Russel Brand claims in his latest video
"A new investigation reports that Anthony Fauci and the NIH received and hid $350 million of royalties from pharma companies."

He however can often say stuff against the TOS so won't bother linking but googling some stories that he probably is using as source material.


NIH scientists received estimated $350 million in royalties since 2009: Report

The medical “research” RACKET: $350 million in royalties was secretly paid to NIH scientists, including Fauci

Fauci, Collins Shared In ‘Secret’ NIH ‘Royalties’ Totaling $350M: Watchdog Report | The Daily Wire


It turns out this was Brand's original source

Substack Investigation: Faucis Royalties And The $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN By NIH

Recieving royalties are a legal way to recieve compensation. Kickbacks are the illegal way to recieve compensation. So not sure what the problem is.

 

[Tom 1]

Recieving royalties are a legal way to recieve compensation. Kickbacks are the illegal way to recieve compensation. So not sure what the problem is.

Fauci-nomics. A branch of the soft sciences driven by the need to find fault with Fauci. Branches out into anyone who made Trump look stupid at some point.

 

[Ignatius the Kiwi]

It's almost as if he has a financial incentive to promote/compel vaccine usage. Saint Fauci could never be compromised by money and personal interests, right?

 

[Maria Billingsley]

Assume u love vaccines, especially ones that admittingly alter your dna, away from Fathers creation, to change dna, like in time of noah, the reason for the flood, corrupted dna. Hmmm

Well that's quite the story. Welcome to CF. AND, I am not vaccinated due to a few family history conditions, Guillion Barre Syndrome and Bells Palsy but certainly not because it would alter my DNA or give me the mark of the beast.
Thanks for sharing.

 

[ThisIsMe123]

Well that's quite the story. Welcome to CF. AND, I am not vaccinated due to a few family history conditions, Guillion Barre Syndrome and Bells Palsy but certainly not because it would alter my DNA or give me the mark of the beast.
Thanks for sharing.

That's a good enough reason to not vaccinate, as even the questionarre for Covid vaccine asks that, but "alter one's DNA" and this "mark of the beast talk" is big foot territory there.

 

[Maria Billingsley]

That's a good enough reason to not vaccinate, as even the questionarre for Covid vaccine asks that, but "alter one's DNA" and this "mark of the beast talk" is big foot territory there.

Interesting! I just looked up the form and that is one of the questions. I did not know it was on their question list. So would I have been rejected? My sister got this disease in the 70's after getting the Swine flu vaccine. She almost died so the entire family has steered away. Thanks for sharing!

 

[ThisIsMe123]

Interesting! I just looked up the form and that is one of the questions. I did not know it was on their question list. So would I have been rejected? My sister got this disease in the 70's after getting the Swine flu vaccine. She almost died so the entire family has steered away. Thanks for sharing!

Well, it was kind of like a generic question like "Have you ever had an allergic reaction to vaccines before" , or something like that.

I got a friend of mine that's allergic to everything in general (well, almost eveyrthing) and she didn't get vaccinated.

 

[Arcangl86]

Some of the top scientists in the country hold patents and thus are being paid royalties? Unbelievable!

 

[iluvatar5150]

I'm looking into what Russel Brand claims in his latest video

Why? Why would anybody do that?

 

[hedrick]

Starting many decades ago, funding agencies encouraged researchers to get patents on their discoveries. The idea was the research ought to encourage creation of new products, and thus researchers should try to move their research into the commercial arena and make products out of them.

You can make arguments against this, but it's been a consistent policy for like 50 years. Personally I'd prefer to separate pure research and commercial development, but this was a reaction to congress being unwilling to fund pure research. They wanted to see results for their constituents. I think it produces a kind of conflict of interest in research, but you can hardly fault Fauci and other researchers for doing what Congress expects people with grants to do.

Typically leaders of organizations like the NIH are scientists. With the current policy, that means they will likely have patents and be getting royalties.