The best sex is always that coerced by the business end of the Bible, right?
Once again the obtuseness is unbelievable. If you are capable of making distinctions, then let me make one so you will hopefully understand:
1. Seduction strategy, i.e. how spouses cultivate and inspire physical intimacy
2. Biblical truth, i.e theology and teaching
One of the most persistent fallacies is the attempt to refute scriptural teaching on the issue of conjugal rights/duties is by arguing that citing these teachings is not going to work to cause a spouse to be more willing to engage in such activities. This is confusing seduction strategy with proper teaching of biblical truth.
What I am arguing for is biblical truth and the clarity of what is at stake in the issue of sexless marriages. This is from a teaching and counseling perspective, not from the perspective of seduction strategy. It is the same difference between theology and ecclesiology. One focuses on truth as scripture lays it out. The other on how truth is communicated for maximum effectiveness.
If you are at all capable of READING what is written rather than inferring what your bias tells you, then I cannot communicate with you. You are hopeless. You have your prejudices and they are unyielding to truth.
In your other post you feel entitled to berate your wife by continuing to fight with her after she asks you to stop. She'll ask you to stop after 5 minutes but, according to your cultural experiences, you explained that 2 to 3 hours is your expectation.
No again, you lack even basic reading comprehension and your biases are obvious. I do not berate my wife. I defend myself when criticized after being attacked in an unprovoked manner. I did not start the conflict. I simply responded. After 5 minutes, my wife expects me to yield to her perception of the situation or she will leave.
I do not expect her to go 2 to 3 hours. Just because I have an experience growing up does not mean that I automatically expect similar things in marriage. I do however, expect that my wife will try to understand my experience and work with it not against it. Certainly I do not expect anything close to 2 to 3 hours. I only have asked her to allow me to have a conversation that doesn't involve ultimatums or threats from her if I don't agree with her take on things. And 5 minutes is never enough to bring clarity and effective communication to resolve differences. If that's all I get, though, I guess I just need to talk faster before the 300 seconds is up.
There is also a control issue. You call it "berating" because you are ignorant about the way I talk. Profanity is off the table. Accusations are out of bounds. Threats are big no-no. I defend and make arguments for why I believe I did the right thing. She disagrees and doesn't accept my explanation or doesn't even allow me the time to make an explanation.
You remind me of Cathy Newman, the British newscaster who interviewed Jordan Peterson.
. Every time he said something, she would re-phrase it in the most uncharitable way possible, even to the point of completely mis-representing his point. The obtuseness in that infamous interview was amazing.