Amy Barrett accused ‘adopted Blacks' to use them as props

[RocksInMyHead]

I threw my dart at the board. Soon enough we will see exactly where it landed.

No, you made a claim and failed to back it up.

 

[LostMarbels]

No, you made a claim and failed to back it up.

You want to try and tell me this is not a current talking point? Why did the Democrats bring up her faith? What was the reasoning?

 

[LostMarbels]

@RocksInMyHead

CONT... And why was racism even brought up concerning the adoption of Haitian children?

What was the seed being planted here?

There are hundreds of news articles and reports.

 

[Sparagmos]

You want to try and tell me this is not a current talking point? Why did the Democrats bring up her faith? What was the reasoning?

View attachment 285363
View attachment 285364
View attachment 285365

Why shouldn’t this organization she’s a part of be relevant? This isn’t about Catholicism. And it’s pretty funny seeing conservatives pretend like religion doesn’t matter. If she was Muslim or Wiccan you all would be ALL over that.

 

[Ana the Ist]

View attachment 285286

Kendi wrote “Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity.” He continued, “And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.” He added, “I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently 'not racist' and the bots completely change what I’m saying to “White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.” These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.”

Who is Ibram X Kendi? Scholar slams Amy Barrett, says White colonizers ‘adopted Blacks' to use them as props


Wow.... so this is where we are going with this nomination? I didn't know it could get this low. It seems Kavanaugh might have gone through daycare after the Dems finish with Amy Barrett. Are you going to tell me they are actually going to drag those kids through the mud by calling their mom a racist?

Kendi's basically just a racist pretending to be a scholar. He hates white people.

 

[LostMarbels]

Why shouldn’t this organization she’s a part of be relevant? This isn’t about Catholicism. And it’s pretty funny seeing conservatives pretend like religion doesn’t matter. If she was Muslim or Wiccan you all would be ALL over that.

No... by all means, define your own stance. I won't stop you. Why would the skin color of the children she adopted or what church she attends even matter?

 

[Ana the Ist]

Your own quote:
“Kendi wrote “Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity.” He continued, “And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.” He added, “I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently 'not racist' and the bots completely change what I’m saying to “White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.” These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.”

Are you not doing the very thing he describes? [Blue text]

Do you believe what he's saying Pommer? That some "white colonizers" are adopting black children in attempt to mask and hide their racism? To use them as props against accusations of racism?

This doesn't sound like the most ridiculous and racist claim you've heard in awhile?

 

[Ana the Ist]

I know homosexuals who married women to “pass” in straight society, (they’re [the wives] are known as “beards”).

Maybe he has a point?

There's no reason to make an 18+ year commitment to do something as loving as adopt a child to "avoid accusations of racism".

People would have to assume that you're racist in the first place for it to be necessary.

 

[Sparagmos]

No... by all means, define your own stance. I won't stop you. Why would the skin color of the children she adopted or what church she attends even matter?

Neither should matter, unless they influenced her decision making as a judge. Then people will naturally be curious about them, since then it affects all of us. It’s not that complicated, just imagine what you might wonder if Obama had appointed a Wiccan, or an orthodox Muslim, to the Supreme Court. You’d have questions.

 

[Ana the Ist]

The sad truth is that this wouldn't even be a conversation if she was black or really anything but white. That's the only reason people consider it ok to question if she's racist.

The irony is that the conversation is led by Kendi....the guy that teaches liberals how to not be racist.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

You want to try and tell me this is not a current talking point? Why did the Democrats bring up her faith? What was the reasoning?

As I said in my initial response, they are questioning the potential influence of the fringe sect that she belongs to. That is not "attacking her for her Catholicism," as you claimed.

@RocksInMyHead

CONT... And why was racism even brought up concerning the adoption of Haitian children?

What was the seed being planted here?

There are hundreds of news articles and reports.

I'm not sure why you tagged me on this, since I made no comment on the matter. But I would surmise that it was at least in part a response to people claiming that she couldn't be racist because she had adopted two black children. I saw a comment to that effect on here last week, and someone else linked a tweet from Candace Owens earlier in this thread where she made the same claim.

 

[LostMarbels]

As I said in my initial response, they are questioning the potential influence of the fringe sect that she belongs to. That is not "attacking her for her Catholicism," as you claimed.

If she was a Free Will Baptist and people said it was a 'fringe sect'... would I be wrong in saying she was being attacked for her Baptist beliefs?

 

[RocksInMyHead]

If she was a Free Will Baptist and people said it was a 'fringe sect'... would I be wrong in saying she was being attacked for her Baptist beliefs?

I don't know what a Free Will Baptist is or how their beliefs might differ from a normal Baptist, so I have no idea.

In Judge Barrett's case, the things being questioned are beliefs and strictures specific to People of Praise. They are not ideas shared by all (or even a significant percentage of) Catholics. Therefore, they are not attacking her for her Catholicism. As a Catholic myself, I do not feel at all attacked by the questions being asked of her.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

View attachment 285286

Kendi wrote “Some White colonizers ‘adopted’ Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity.” He continued, “And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.” He added, “I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently 'not racist' and the bots completely change what I’m saying to “White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.” These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.”

A lot of people believe White people are adopting black children. To use them as props. This is nothing new. Also he wrong, that people are adopting black people, so they don't look prejudice. I do know many black people don't trust white people to parent black children.

 

[durangodawood]

What does it matter what mosque the next scotus appointee attended?

 

[Pathfinder627]

I don't know what a Free Will Baptist is or how their beliefs might differ from a normal Baptist, so I have no idea.

In Judge Barrett's case, the things being questioned are beliefs and strictures specific to People of Praise. They are not ideas shared by all (or even a significant percentage of) Catholics. Therefore, they are not attacking her for her Catholicism. As a Catholic myself, I do not feel at all attacked by the questions being asked of her.

That's because the charismatic Catholics have the Holy Spirit and you don't. You're not even related. Why would you care?

 

[LostMarbels]

What does it matter what mosque the next scotus appointee attended?

That is correct.

 

[LostMarbels]

Why shouldn’t this organization she’s a part of be relevant? This isn’t about Catholicism. And it’s pretty funny seeing conservatives pretend like religion doesn’t matter. If she was Muslim or Wiccan you all would be ALL over that.

I will agree... I will never back or vote for a Wiccan, Satanist, Luciferian.... I would fight like crazy to keep them out matter of fact.

 

[durangodawood]

That is correct.

No. It's not. Certain mosques preach flat out unacceptable ideology. And if you persisted there, your own judgement is called into question.

 

[ewq1938]