- Apr 3, 2003
- 26,150
- 11,417
- 76
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Should we make a list of all the things that 52% of the people believe and then cross off all the things that are not true?
actually people draw conclusions about people base on what they have been told by other people. What have the people been told about Trump day after day, 95%+ of the msm coverage has been nothing but negative. Now in all truth he has made some errors but seriously can anyone deserve 95% negative coverage. think about what that would do to the average person if every time you spoke to them you were negative about them. Does anyone deserve that?People draw conclusions from behavior.
actually people draw conclusions about people base on what they have been told by other people. What have the people been told about Trump day after day, 95%+ of the msm coverage has been nothing but negative.
What have the people been told about Trump day after day, 95%+ of the msm coverage has been nothing but negative.
Now in all truth he has made some errors but seriously can anyone deserve 95% negative coverage.
and even worse when it was proven that much of what they said about him was wrong, they just kept right on going. Is there anything fair about that? So what would you expect people to think?
You just proved my point every thing you said is right from the msm talking pointsAmericans are smarter than you seem to think they are.
Since 93.4% of all internet statistics are just made up, I'd like to see your data.
I notice news sites like Fox try to put a positive slant on his behavior, and Fox is one of the largest sources. C'mon.
One of the problems for people who never take responsibility for anything they do, is people tend to think the worst of them. His bungling of the pandemic, his suggesting that it might be good to inject disinfectants, sending troops into the street to attack peaceful protestors so that he could pose with a Bible in front of a church, his claims that the concerns about the pandemic were a "hoax", his boasting about getting away with sexual assault; it all adds up.
He really has no one to blame but himself.
You just proved my point every thing you said is right from the msm talking points
you left out this from your previous post "His bungling of the pandemic, his suggesting that it might be good to inject disinfectants, sending troops into the street to attack peaceful protestors so that he could pose with a Bible in front of a church, his claims that the concerns about the pandemic were a "hoax", his boasting about getting away with sexual assault; it all adds up." As I said these are right out of the msm talking points. The msm says it 24/7 and of course the people begin to repeat it not even thinking that they are being programed.Americans are smarter than you seem to think they are.
Since 93.4% of all internet statistics are just made up, I'd like to see your data.
I notice news sites like Fox try to put a positive slant on his behavior, and Fox is one of the largest sources. C'mon.
MSM challenged you to provide data? Or are you upset about MSM supposing Americans are more intelligent than you seem to think they are? Or are you denying that Fox is a major network?
Or are you denying Trump did all those things? I can show you, if you'd like. Would you like me to show you?
But I'd still like to see your data on that 95%. What do you have?
People draw conclusions from behavior.
With most results carry more weight.
The msm says it 24/7
Not one out of a hundred could come up with anything like evidence of it if pressed for a reason they voted "yes" on him being a "racist," however.Results are the reason Americans have given up on Trump. We a weaker nation, a poorer nation, and more divided than we were before Trump.
But we were speaking of the way Americans have found Trump to be a racist.
Not one out of a hundred could come up with anything like evidence of it if pressed for a reason they voted "yes" on him being a "racist," however.
It's not a matter of being smart, and I'm not the only one here who has tried to point that fact out.
Your attempt to change the subject aside, the point is that normal, intelligent, people are capable of being deceived when the deceivers are numerous enough, come with apparently sterling credentials, and put together a convincing story, even if it's entirely false.Yes, it's pretty much a matter of being smart enough to check your sources. If you don't agree, that might be a revelation in itself.
Your attempt to change the subject aside, the point is that normal, intelligent, people are capable of being deceived when the deceivers are numerous enough, come with apparently sterling credentials, and put together a convincing story, even if it's entirely false.
When there are so many disparate comments on these events in the mainstream media (like Fox for example) that's not a believable story. C'mon.
Fox
includes a Democratic or liberal panelist on almost every political debate for the sake of balance...
The other story is being told by the following: ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, PBS, MSNBC, Newsy, CNN, CNN Headline News, BBC, NYTimes, Washington Post, Detroit Free Press, LA Times, Newsweek, Time Magazine, Vanity Fair, and a host of other magazines and metropolitan newspapers.
Ah, the obligatory reference to Fox. While there is that network, which includes a Democratic or liberal panelist on almost every political debate for the sake of balance...