- Jun 25, 2003
- 290
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Democrat
We have had threads here about whether or not Alcoholics Anonymous works over the years. The current scientific consensus is that AA helps keep a large subset of alcoholics sober. Since that link is a New York Times link which may be paywalled, the same report has been covered by Reuters, NPR, Boston’s NPR station, Vox, among others.
What does the report say? It says AA works, it says AA is helpful, it says that AA has a 42% success rate (compared to the 35% success in the control treatment condition). AA does significantly better than other treatments when we measure alcohol abstinence, and as well as other treatments when measuring success in other ways. Point being, AA has been scientifically shown to be a viable low-cost treatment for alcoholism.
While there have been accusations that AA has only a “5% success rate” and what not posted at online forums over the years, the methodology to come up with a figure that low was flawed, and the current scientific evidence shows that AA is helpful for some alcoholics who want to get better (around 40%, if using numbers from this Cochrane metastudy).
What does the report say? It says AA works, it says AA is helpful, it says that AA has a 42% success rate (compared to the 35% success in the control treatment condition). AA does significantly better than other treatments when we measure alcohol abstinence, and as well as other treatments when measuring success in other ways. Point being, AA has been scientifically shown to be a viable low-cost treatment for alcoholism.
While there have been accusations that AA has only a “5% success rate” and what not posted at online forums over the years, the methodology to come up with a figure that low was flawed, and the current scientific evidence shows that AA is helpful for some alcoholics who want to get better (around 40%, if using numbers from this Cochrane metastudy).
Last edited: