- Mar 17, 2015
- 17,173
- 9,191
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
It can be fruitful from that point of view. There are others on the forum that are experts in such matters. I have to admit that while I was Protestant I was fascinated with "endings and beginnings" ... especially Genesis and Revelation. It's just that time is limited and I've found things I much more need to pay attention to. I'm not sure I can do it justice.
Off the top of my head, you know Origen is heretical on a number of matters and not safely trusted as a "Church Father"? And St. Augustine is not without certain errors. But I have to say I've never investigated either of them on this particular matter.
(By the way, iirc what Origen taught about souls was one of his worst heresies.)
However, there are proponents of Holy Tradition who do maintain an allegorical view of the creation account in some particulars. That's why I made the list of points. And I really don't like to argue either way.
The topic COULD stay here, and it could be fruitful. But I'm just saying that bringing into it what I saw glancing through is not aligned with this forum. It almost needs to be two separate discussions, I think.
(One thing I've learned about the Church Fathers is that we should never take a list of quotes (especially from someone with an agenda) and assume what they seem to say is the whole understanding of their view. I'm not saying that's what you have done. But what has happened is that it often takes dedicated days or even weeks to track down those arguments I found unlikely. I have learned a LOT in the process, but mostly to say that isolated quotes must be carefully considered. This is why I'm really not sure I can do this topic justice.)
The wiki makes it sound as if only Origen's views on the preexistence of souls stood out as rejected, and was one of only 2 especially notable views of that Origen actually did have (instead of only wrongly asserted about him) that were finally rejected (out of a huge number of theological insights and points from Origen, including many now basic ones which we all agree with it seems, such as basic aspects of what became the Trinity doctrine). Because he wrote so much and so many read it, there were a variety of people that objected to this or that, because so many read what Origen wrote. Origen was misrepresented by others, even Jerome on one prominent matter, but Origen responded to correct that misperception. Put it this way: if one disagreed with Origen broadly, they would be in error today about a lot of things it appears from this overview, since Origen wrote on so many things usefully, I get the impression, from the wiki.
Upvote
0