Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have stepped into an arena that I am not qualified to step into I guess, and my notions may be elementary/outdated.
I do believe in evolution in a certain light. I just dont believe that humans came from a different creature.
Then again, I dont think God created in days. Those days may have been years/decades and there was a progression of life as it was created. With that in mind, what is your opinion then? How was it orhestrated? By whom/what?
Thanks for the sites. I will finish watching/reading later.
Simply, I believe we have a Creator. Just my belief. I believe because I see/feel his presence in my life and in the world.
Please tell my your opinion of things. If you've layed it out already on this thread previsously, then I will come across it as I read through.
Thanks!!
Could you give a reason that you dont think the human beings could have evolved from non human ancestors?
If its a case of cant be because of what the bible says, then there is nothing to discuss.
I would think it allows as much discussion as your own opionions, based on literature you read, no?
I read your last posting yesterday and literally sat last night trying to remember if I made a "conscious" choice to believe the Bible is the word of God. As I said I don't believe it was a conscious choice. So to me I suppose I have always believed the Bible was the word of God. When I started reading the Bible (KJV) I don't think I picked it up and said "ok these are Gods words". Again this may be a case of not being able to explain what I am trying to say.
Maybe it was Sunday school and I just don't recall. Regardless though, whether it was a conscious choice or not or how I came to that conclusion, its how I read it now and thats what is important to me.
I guess that is where we differ. I do not question the Bible for I believe I would be questioning God. Now I do at times (a lot of times) have questions about what I am reading. If my question cannot be answered, then I will take it for what it says and not give a second thought to it.
If I am considered closed minded for not believing in something that contradicts the Bible, then so be it. I believe the word of God, not the word of man
I've read through evolution, to me it contradicts the Bible. In all honesty I believe it is a sin to believe in evolution.
You asked me why I thought the Bible was the Word of God. I believe those scriptures, tell us the Bible is the Word of God.
Did Jesus use parables and metaphors? Sure He did. But I do agree with AV on the point just because Jesus used a parable to get His point across, does that mean the parable He used wasn't true? No of course not.
Oh yes the obvious metaphors, just like the one where Jesus said He is a door, do I believe He became a door? NO
So what you are saying is, if a scripture goes against science, then that scripture must not be taken literally? How about trying to change it to if science goes against the Bible, then someone made an error with science?
When you read the scriptures do you sit and think, ok does this agree with what I believe? Or "oh this is just so impossible to believe, so I am just not going to take it literally?"
Let me ask you: What has believing in evolution done for you, besides having the capability of arguing that evolution is true and the Bible shouldn't be taken literally?
Interesting --- interesting indeed.If its a case of cant be because of what the bible says, then there is nothing to discuss.
That's coolThe Holy Spirit can reveal the deep things of God in a passage.In my own personal Bible study one day, I came across this passage [again]:That passage to me seems almost out of place, until you study bdellium, and learn that frankinsense and myrrh are made from it.
Gold, frankinsense and myrrh --- get it?
It's saying that Jesus is there.
No I am not appealing to the ignorance of people in the past, I am pointing to the dangers of us being blinkered by our 21st century perspective, and thinking an interpretation is absurd because it contradicts what we now know from science, when this plain meaning of the text made perfect sense to the people it was written to. I think there are two big problems with this approach, firstly it does not respect the word of God enough to look at what it is actually saying, and secondly it always seems to slip into a double standards of insisting the geocentric passages can't possibly be literal because we know better from science, while with evolution, science cannot possibly be right because you interpret Genesis literally.I don't think appealing to the ignorance (by comparison) of the people back then is an effective way of making a point; especially when comparing ourselves to an omniscient God.
Outside of the Bible, I work in nature and on human bodies. It amazes me how complicated and intricate everything is. Merely on these reasons, I believe what I do.
Interesting --- interesting indeed.
Ah so the Holy Spirit can reveal the metaphorical meaning of scriptures. I like that. Very few Creationists realise this.
Was a time when the earth not moving made perfect sense. People believed the earth was fixed at the center of the universe.
That is what they thought the passage obviously meant. It does not make sense any more because we know the earth rotates and orbits the sun.
Creation by God in a week makes perfect sense. To look to the so called spirit for a deeper meaning, that makes God an imbecile, and a liar is a foolish endeavor.But neither does six day creationism make sense any more. Yet you chose to stick to the dead words of literal interpretation instead looking to the Holy Spirit for a deeper meaning? Why rely on the Holy Spirit to teach you the meaning of fixed earth passages, but rely on you own idea of what makes sense for Genesis?
I have stepped into an arena that I am not qualified to step into I guess, and my notions may be elementary/outdated.
I do believe in evolution in a certain light. I just dont believe that humans came from a different creature.
Then again, I dont think God created in matters of days. Those days may have been years/decades and there was a progression of life as it was created. With that in mind, what is your opinion then? How was it orchestrated? By whom/what?
Thanks for the sites. I will finish watching/reading later.
Simply, I believe we have a Creator. Just my belief. I believe because I see/feel his presence in my life and in the world.
Hey --- c'mon! I've been saying this for years!I have stepped into an arena that I am not qualified to step into I guess, and my notions may be elementary/outdated.Kudos to you for having the humility and intellectual honesty to admit that to us and most importantly to yourself. It's unfortunately a very rare occurance these days to see those two admirable traits among creationists. I must admit I can't think of previous instances, despite having been on these boards for years.
"God did it - Case closed" & "Science can take a hike" come to mind. Unless you've redefined the meaning of the word "humility."Hey --- c'mon! I've been saying this for years!
--- How's come I don't get any kudos?
Hey --- c'mon! I've been saying this for years!
--- How's come I don't get any kudos?
Hey --- c'mon! I've been saying this for years!
--- How's come I don't get any kudos?
reality can take a hike.
[serious];52121527 said:That's why.
:/ --- Oh. I knew there was a catch somewhere.
If A = A, then A = A. That's a meaningless and useless statement. It seems that we've reached the real conclusion of this exercise: A word can have many meanings and which one you choose depends on your prior beliefs and convictions. Proof of this is the many interpretations of the Bible even within Christianity, within Christian sects, and even within Churches. Everyone thinks they know the true meaning and everyone else is wrong.No. It is up to the spirit to reveal it to us. We need to get the spirit of the word, the letter kills. Behind the appearances of dead words, is a vibrant, living, hot contact with another world, and God, and the future and the past.
If it means what it means...it means what it means. If it merely seems to mean what some would prefer it to mean, it is better to stick with what it obviously means. The idea that neither us nor the earth actually moves physically is absurd. But the time of creation is fact.
If all else fails ask for God's help to get it.
You have a very unique personality, AV. I have met very few people so unwilling to even consider other possibilities. I think this is my greatest fear when it comes to religious indoctrination such as the one you've obviously received. "My belief indicates that I'm right." "What can be perceived, measured, and examined is wrong if a book tells me so." "If opening my mind means I will no longer believe what I currently do, then I'll stay close-minded." Do you see those qualities as virtues that everyone should have?If it turned you into a Taoist, someone else into a Buddhist, someone else into an Agnostic, and someone else into an Atheist --- I want no part of it.
This brings back memories of my loss of faith and I have a feeling a lot of you have or may be going through something similar.I guess that is where we differ. I do not question the Bible for I believe I would be questioning God. Now I do at times (a lot of times) have questions about what I am reading. If my question cannot be answered, then I will take it for what it says and not give a second thought to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?