Please, Does someone know how to appreciate the appointment of Judas among the twelves?
I indeed wonder whether it's or not Jesus that gave him his financial role and if not, why doesn't the Gospel report the least objection from Jesus toward this activity of him? Is there a moral way of dealing with money, whereas He said that one cannot serve both God and Mammon? whereas He advised His followers to live from the favours of God, and the wealthy young man to give all his goods in order to get a treasure in heaven?
I confess i often deal with this contradiction, maybe in a bit hypocritical way, considering money must remain servant, and her/his owner, its master. But there is simultaneously a tiny and a huge gap between those two attitudes, and the bridge over it is often easy to cross. Has someone the key? Should we exclusively connect ourselves with the favour of God? At first, i would reply yes, but i don't understand how Judas remained for such a long time among the apostles, before even his treason, with this ministry..
I indeed wonder whether it's or not Jesus that gave him his financial role and if not, why doesn't the Gospel report the least objection from Jesus toward this activity of him? Is there a moral way of dealing with money, whereas He said that one cannot serve both God and Mammon? whereas He advised His followers to live from the favours of God, and the wealthy young man to give all his goods in order to get a treasure in heaven?
I confess i often deal with this contradiction, maybe in a bit hypocritical way, considering money must remain servant, and her/his owner, its master. But there is simultaneously a tiny and a huge gap between those two attitudes, and the bridge over it is often easy to cross. Has someone the key? Should we exclusively connect ourselves with the favour of God? At first, i would reply yes, but i don't understand how Judas remained for such a long time among the apostles, before even his treason, with this ministry..