Zoii
Well-Known Member
- Oct 13, 2016
- 5,811
- 3,982
- 23
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
I don't what you mean about *but*. That women live on the border of starvation in Africa, that women cannot carry the child to term because of a physical pathology, that they have suffered rape, that they suffer a worsened psychosis with pregnancy.... These are not trivial and not are they uncommon. In underdeveloped nations they have few or no resources to assist. I can't be the one to throw stones at these women. I anguish for their plight.In all moral situations in life, we can all say no but, however, as the Bible clearly shows, we do not formulate moral decisions based on the but.
Society loses it way when it makes decisions based on the but rather than on a moral imperative. If you make decisions on the but, there is no end to where you can go to justify a position.
That is what has happened with abortion. The slippery slope of death had robbed us of 55 million babies since Roe v Wade all because of a law that was intended to protect women who were raped.
Now in most countries, the law has morphed into a law where you can have your baby killed for whatever reason at any time. We are worse than animals as not one animal species kills its babies in the womb.
It is pleasing to note that the clock is being wound back in the USA on abortion. Less than 50% of young people believe that abortion should be legal. Abortion facilities are closing because they do not want to made accountable for hygiene and medical standards that hospitals are required to operate by and they don't want to comply with admitting requirements to a hospital for women where abortions go wrong as they don't want people to know about that.
Last edited:
Upvote
0