• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.
  3. Please note there is a new rule regarding the posting of videos. It reads, "Post a summary of the videos you post . An exception can be made for music videos.". Unless you are simply sharing music, please post a summary, or the gist, of the video you wish to share.
  4. There have been some changes in the Life Stages section involving the following forums: Roaring 20s, Terrific Thirties, Fabulous Forties, and Golden Eagles. They are changed to Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Golden Eagles will have a slight change.
  5. CF Staff, Angels and Ambassadors; ask that you join us in praying for the world in this difficult time, asking our Holy Father to stop the spread of the virus, and for healing of all affected.
  6. We are no longer allowing posts or threads that deny the existence of Covid-19. Members have lost loved ones to this virus and are grieving. As a Christian site, we do not need to add to the pain of the loss by allowing posts that deny the existence of the virus that killed their loved one. Future post denying the Covid-19 existence, calling it a hoax, will be addressed via the warning system.
  7. There has been an addition to the announcement regarding unacceptable nick names. The phrase "Let's go Brandon" actually stands for a profanity and will be seen as a violation of the profanity rule in the future.

Abortion is Failing Women: An Interview with Angela Wu Howard

Discussion in 'One Bread, One Body - Catholic' started by Michie, Oct 26, 2021.

  1. Michie

    Michie Human rights begin in the womb. Supporter

    United States
    Angela Wu Howard, a legal scholar who has practiced law in the U.S. and internationally, is one of the signers of an amicus brief supporting Mississippi’s pro-life law.

    Editor's Note: Part of a continuing series examining the U.S. Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a direct challenge to the 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion throughout the United States.

    On Dec. 1, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Many legal experts say the case presents the most momentous test yet of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. At issue is the constitutionality of Mississippi’s 2018 law banning most abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy.

    As with any high-profile Supreme Court case, dozens of amicus curiae, or “friend of the court,” briefs have been filed both in support of and in opposition to the Mississippi law.

    Continued below.
    Abortion is Failing Women: An Interview with Angela Wu Howard
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. narnia59

    narnia59 Regular Member Supporter

    Am I the only person who is somewhat bothered by the direction taken by pro-life groups in recent years that puts a lot of emphasis on trying to prove that abortion is bad for women?

    With rare exceptions, women freely make the choice to have an abortion. It seems to me that we have fallen into a trap that wants to portray the women who choose to have an abortion as victims and shift the blame for their choice to others, and specifically to the abortion industry.

    I don't disagree that the abortion industry has no real desire to help women and every real desire to make money. Their marketing strategy that they are pro-woman has been effective. But is that because women are inherently weak, or simply because women in general who seek abortions lack the moral conviction to make a choice that is not self serving and require sacrifice?

    It seems to me when we extend so much effort into trying to make the point that abortion is bad for women, we are giving an equal place to that along with the life of the child that's lost. How can they even compare?

    I don't think I'm saying this well so don't clobber me too much. I'm just curious if others have a nagging feeling that it's a bit troublesome when pro-life groups focus on how abortion is bad for women.
  3. Andrei D

    Andrei D Well-Known Member

    United States
    Eastern Orthodox
    I am bothered by most of the arguments of the pro-life movements. I think they are distracting and misleading in the sense that they take the focus away from the core issue and thus dilute it. It also feels to me that they end up "relativizing" what should be a moral imperative. It concerns me greatly.

    There is a Catholic apologist on YouTube who makes this case against diluting and diverging the pro-life argumentation much better than I could: 5 Pro-life arguments you should avoid - YouTube
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2021
  4. narnia59

    narnia59 Regular Member Supporter

    I think he makes some very good points.

    I have found the most relevant question when given a reason to support abortion is to ask whether that reasoning would apply to a child outside the womb. And why not.