Not "returning" (that's not what Matthew 24:30 says). What appeared was "the sign of the Son of man in heaven" (which is what's written in Matthew 24:30).
If you're imagining something like what's pictured here....then, no, that didn't happen (nor was it ever prophesied to happen):
Matthew 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
The first thing to note is this, and that all of this is undeniable.
1) There is first the tribulation. That is obviously meaning what is recorded in Matthew 24:15-26.
2) Immediately after the events recorded in Matthew 24:15-26, shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
3) Then, meaning after all of the above things have been fulfilled first, shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven
4) and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory---meaning after everything recorded in 1), 2), and 3).
5) And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other---meaning during the coming meant in 4).
What coming, in any sense, are Preterists, such as yourself, proposing, that occured after 1), 2), and 3), and yet involves 5)?
In light of all of that, can you then provide the Scriptures and or ancient history records, which Preterists use to support the coming in 4) and the gathering in 5)?