I am not in the habit of limiting my responders so this is a bit unusual. But I have come across something that i am not quite sure how to respond to.
I am familiar with what replacement theology is and what theological antisemitism is; but is there a name for the theological idea that there is a hard break between the Mosaic Covenant and the New Covenant; with the New being a complete re-boot with no carryover? Does that idea fit into one of the previous two categories, and if so, HOW?
I am really not fond of the Theological labeling, though many good things come out of the debates, I've seen one too many babies get thrown out with the bath water, a result of seeking to defend one's take, and stand, instead of seeking to defend the Truth.
Nevertheless, (as was pointed out) the doing away with the Old, and bringing in a new replacement would fall under Replacement.
There are various forms of Replacing, such as replacing faulty notions with more sound notions in our individual growth, replacing ineffective priesthoods with more effective priesthoods, etc., these type of replacements play a major role in the growth and development of one's faith, yet are endangered by the loose labeling of Replacement Theology.
Did or did not Apʰrîyém and Manasseh replace Reuben and Simeon as first and second born?
Though the overall Plan, Promises, and Prophecies do not change qualification (or the lack thereof) can easily result in a promotion (or demotion), case and point, if the bride does not stand up and reveal to the King her true nativity, Alôhâyîm is subject to raise up Salvation through another who will.
Standing in the Stead of another person is a type of replacement that does not change a prophecy, the over all plan, or any of the promises therein, though the who, when, where, how, and why may be affected by the contingencies of qualification, i.e., in an acceptable time.
