Hi there,
So this is just a hypothetical: if a mutation ceases to provoke adaptation, to a particular selection pressure, will "Design" come to the rescue (where random change would only hinder)? Will "Design" ensure that the rest of the adaptation is fulfilled, before the creature gives up and takes flight? The point is "Design" is a greater strength at fulfilling adaptations, either sequentially or tangentially or reaffirmingly (complexly hard to instill). For every mutation, there are a number of things that "Design" could complete - is what I am saying. "Design" is not limited to maintaining the same outlook to every selection pressure.
This really is the cloak and dagger of "Evolution" that somehow "Evolution" has an answer to mutation, that "Design" does not. But when "Design" answers "sin", it answers the question of mutation pre-emptively: mutation does not become strong, unless you allow it to continue - but continuing is a question of faith not mutation. I want to believe I can be great, I get that, but I want to be great "lawfully" and substituting pressure for faith, is disingenuous, unless you really aim to be as weak as possible, while doing it.
I want to impress on you that faith works more dynamically, with selection pressure, than "consequence", there are a number of selection pressures working on people at anyone time, perfecting the response to a single mutation in no way addresses all those pressures, without faith compounding them to the one interpretation. What is an advance of mutation to one pressure, does not identify with others unless there is a way of comparing one adaptation to another - precisely what "Design" enables, both in stipulation (of what is possible) and flourishing (as to how well what is possible is known). You can't grease the monkey for multiple selection pressures and not have the greater response to adaptation slip through your fingers.
The important thing is character. If adaptation helps you build character, you are able to interpret what selection pressure is affecting you and how. If you have character, you can reorientate an adaptation to the most viable potential possible. Even predators do this, though not to the same extent. What is expected, is - if not a resurrection - a reaffirmation of the adaptations of the previous generation, that worked for the next. This is the whole point of honouring your parents - you have twice the reason to obey parents of the same kind, because the lineage is that much easier and lighter to pass on: it does not create a cognitive load, that needs to manipulate outcomes for specific mutations and their respective adaptations.
I don't know if you can grasp this: but the principality of congeniality is as adaptive or more of adaptations that work, than might be possible by untold chance. Refining adaptations for a single design, creates its own Evolution - a "genetic Revolution" if you will.
You are right, you need to be open-minded about what a mutation leaves you open to, but ignoring mutation can be made worthwhile, if the greater genetic revolution is enabled.
This is the true, differentiation of the species, that it happen through variety of design, not only compounding expectation of attenuation.
So this is just a hypothetical: if a mutation ceases to provoke adaptation, to a particular selection pressure, will "Design" come to the rescue (where random change would only hinder)? Will "Design" ensure that the rest of the adaptation is fulfilled, before the creature gives up and takes flight? The point is "Design" is a greater strength at fulfilling adaptations, either sequentially or tangentially or reaffirmingly (complexly hard to instill). For every mutation, there are a number of things that "Design" could complete - is what I am saying. "Design" is not limited to maintaining the same outlook to every selection pressure.
This really is the cloak and dagger of "Evolution" that somehow "Evolution" has an answer to mutation, that "Design" does not. But when "Design" answers "sin", it answers the question of mutation pre-emptively: mutation does not become strong, unless you allow it to continue - but continuing is a question of faith not mutation. I want to believe I can be great, I get that, but I want to be great "lawfully" and substituting pressure for faith, is disingenuous, unless you really aim to be as weak as possible, while doing it.
I want to impress on you that faith works more dynamically, with selection pressure, than "consequence", there are a number of selection pressures working on people at anyone time, perfecting the response to a single mutation in no way addresses all those pressures, without faith compounding them to the one interpretation. What is an advance of mutation to one pressure, does not identify with others unless there is a way of comparing one adaptation to another - precisely what "Design" enables, both in stipulation (of what is possible) and flourishing (as to how well what is possible is known). You can't grease the monkey for multiple selection pressures and not have the greater response to adaptation slip through your fingers.
The important thing is character. If adaptation helps you build character, you are able to interpret what selection pressure is affecting you and how. If you have character, you can reorientate an adaptation to the most viable potential possible. Even predators do this, though not to the same extent. What is expected, is - if not a resurrection - a reaffirmation of the adaptations of the previous generation, that worked for the next. This is the whole point of honouring your parents - you have twice the reason to obey parents of the same kind, because the lineage is that much easier and lighter to pass on: it does not create a cognitive load, that needs to manipulate outcomes for specific mutations and their respective adaptations.
I don't know if you can grasp this: but the principality of congeniality is as adaptive or more of adaptations that work, than might be possible by untold chance. Refining adaptations for a single design, creates its own Evolution - a "genetic Revolution" if you will.
You are right, you need to be open-minded about what a mutation leaves you open to, but ignoring mutation can be made worthwhile, if the greater genetic revolution is enabled.
This is the true, differentiation of the species, that it happen through variety of design, not only compounding expectation of attenuation.
