Oh plus I thought, like now with liberalism, socialism, it totally isn't working and has almost done more harm then good, so I am not completely sold but I don't think it should be completely discarded either. What is the one of the biggest causes of social strife and conflict in the world? Well, if enough people stopped obeying the people in power, then they'd lose said power.
"
0] It asserts that a society based on freedom and justice can be achieved through abolishing
authoritarian institutions that control certain
means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic
elite.
[11] Libertarian socialists advocate for
decentralized structures based on
direct democracy and
federal or
confederal associations such as
libertarian municipalism, citizens' assemblies,
trade unions and
workers' councils.
[12][13]"
Again, this is only socialism, but for example, we would be able to at least feed the majority of earth's population if we were to take more control of food production, which is severly limited at this point, the world over.
There are at least non-violent options or courses one can take before even taking into consideration the options of force. I think with the "libertarian" aspect, I am not sure if I'd say the workers should own all aspects of production (and, it even says "some of the means of peoduction" I am not sure it literally means the workers control everything) they would simply have more control over their livliehood and perhaps public life in their own demographics at the perhaps. Capitalism at some point will honestly lead to more conflict, strife, and the degragation of the enviornment, and is just generally unsustainable and there will just be an endless amount of class warfare in the future, if not the total annihalhation. It might not be us now, but it will be in the future. We at least need to own things like water and food production I think. With capitalism and business, ironically, this is what it accomplishes anyway. The means of production is spread by commerce and business, but instead they trade resources instead of evenly or fairly distributing them. The only problem with this is, it (now at least) relies primarily on crony capitalisms who may not even fully have the workers interests, or have really any education at all to make large or grand decisions on the livliehood of a great percentage of the earth's population. With libertarian socialism at least there can still be business, it's just as well they would decentralize institutions, which would function the same as business in that it stops large bodies of power from gaining all the control, which in a sense is what preserves independence or freedom and likewise to ideas liken to classical liberalism which is partially agian, are ideas traditionally associated with individual rights and democracy.
Even with Christianity, "judgement day" lol, things like that, I am not entirely sure I agree with the interpertation that we'll destroy the entire world.
