createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
A case for prepping 1
After years of discussions and study, I concluded that most of those who oppose prepping do so from a faux spiritual/religious stance. Many think to prepare for physical and material hard times is unspiritual and carnal. A true believer, say they, will not worry about such materialistic concerns. They arrive at this conclusion by erroneous interpretations of a handful of scriptural passages and a false notion that to seek to survive in the natural somehow causes you to forfeit your standing in the spiritual. "Spiritual" people are not concerned with saving the physical lives of their families. We, of course, disagree with this thinking and will present scripture and logic to defeat it. We hold that it is both irresponsible and unscriptural to abandon the care and concern for your family and loved ones based on some false notion of spirituality and faith. Nowhere does the scripture tell us to neglect the needs of our families, whether present or future, in favor of some imaginary spiritual enlightenment. God is not asking us and our families to risk starvation so that we can gain spiritual points. To the contrary, the scriptures demand that we see to the needs of our family, and failure to do so equates us to an infidel.
1 Timothy 5:8 KJV
8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
We will show that this requirement does not end at midnight of the day, nor are we exempt from it because *hard times* are upon us. Jesus said that when we by experience and common sense know what is coming we should prepare.
Matthew 16:2-3 KJV
2 He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.
3 And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
When we, by observation and a solid knowledge of history, can see what is coming, we should discern the signs and the times and common sense and reasonable action to protect our family and loved ones. What do we see coming in our immediate future? This should be obvious to all. Jesus was implying that if you saw bad weather coming, you should see it and beware. If the sky showed you bad weather coming would you prepare for a journey? If you were warned that floods were coming, would you take the kids for a hike in the woods? If it became evident that a huge blizzard was overdue, would you launch out with the family to the mountains for a camp-out? Certainly not. You would run to the store and made sure you had batteries, firewood, bottled water, and some games for the kids. You would do all those common sense preparations that anyone with a sound head would do. You would prepare to weather the storm. Nobody would count you faithless or unspiritual if you reacted in this way. You would be a good parent. If you refused to take these simple common sense preparations because it was "unspiritual"; many would count you as a religious nut, and rightly so.
The question I must ask is what is the difference between prepping for the weekend and prepping for a month, or a year? The difference is if you fail to prep for the weekend, you may be inconvenienced and uncomfortable. But if you fail to prep for a month or a year, you and your family may die. There is a serious dichotomy in the thinking that says we should prepare lest we be uncomfortable, but refuse to prepare to when our lives and the lives of our families are forfeit.
I can see this mind set as appealing.
but in the case of Y2K, let me give an example.
(or better year 2008) a newer catastrophy.
The stock market crashed.
most stocks recovered within 2 years.
due to bailout pressures.
they would have bailed out eventually some of them,
but our sp500, may have been an sp100 at the end of the recession.
so obama shortened the recession duration significantly by hyperinflating the market with play monopoly money.
I don't like it either,
but because it was a case of where drastic measures was actually needed and not merely wanted the inflation rate did not adjust as conservative said it would.
so small story short, it worked.
stock went back into a bull market until about less than a month ago.
people recovered all they lossed and more.
and then gained 100-200% more.
in some cases.
so in this particular situation,
bunkering down and for armegeddon was premature.
if some of those companies that lost a lot,
decided to prep, intstead of reinvest their losses.
realocate and attempt recovery.
they would be alive yes, but unnemployed.
all resources needed to be reinvested, even in the hard times.
you simply realocate your investment.
instead of small caps value stock.
you may want to go for medium or large cap stock, which offer more stability and less yield.
like AAPL for one, is a fairly recession proof stock.
it took a dive too in last two weeks.
but I simply moved over to UVXY during that period and made a killing on futures stock.
but now I realized their are strategies that rely in principle on falling stock price.
one is short trading.
short traders are considered the smart money.
but in a book I am reading (about 1/4 through it from starting yesterday)....
it talks about it.
http://www.amazon.com/How-Day-Trade-Stocks-Profit-ebook/dp/B004IWRC9Shttp://www.amazon.com/How-Day-Trade-Stocks-Profit-ebook/dp/B004IWRC9S
for a purchase of 10-20 bucks that book can increase your net worth by 1000% in 6 months.l
just read the reviews of the people who bought it.
All I am saying is buying cans of beans that last for years, is probably wise to do any time, because we don't know what lies in the future.
buying bulk items at costco is wise anytime, especially if we will use it, and if we will pay more buying individuals.
but I wouldn't call this prepping per say.
(and a note for gun preppers)
don't go and buy more ammo.
although thats a temptation.
like of it this way....
you shoot someone in the right shoulder, then can grab you with the left shoulder.
but if you pepper spray them (ear to ear) is the proper technique.
that affect lasts 30-45 minutes minimum.
some times it has UV marking dye in it.
so if the perpetrator runs, they aint getting far....
some have tear gas as well.
so the guy coughing, rolling around the ground, with UV markers painted on him,
is your guy.
when police come, they know who to go after.
I also recommend scrapping them with a tactical pen on arm, leg or hand.
while they are disabled by pepper gel of course.
unless there is a kubaton with a DNA catcher on it, I would use this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Best-Tactical-Pen-Self-Defense/dp/B00R5FMIUI
but that one is very large (long)
there is a cheaper version (I think it also looks like a DNA catcher/scrapper on end)
http://www.amazon.com/MTECH-USA-XTR...GQVCFQ0&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR160,160_
(they sell stun gun flashlight combo's with dna catchers, but they are more money, which defeats the purpose of our goal of saving not depleating resources in an emergency.
the above is all non lethal, they walk away with a scrape and a burning face neck and throat, but they will be fine later with a bandaid and mild detergent shower. (dishsoap and water bucket).
since most perpetrators don't carry a oil solvent like dish soap, they will need to repeatedly flush eyes of oil based gels. that just smear with water.
DNA catcher can track perpetrator globally.
plus they won't know what you are doing, if you jab them with a blunt point pen, they may just think you are trying to kubaton them. But you are catching DNA for tracking. To give to police later.
if you simply shoot first, think later.
you have a possible lawsuit or worse on your hands.
not to mention, if you miss, they could back fire it on you.
(same with pepper spray, but I would rather be pepper sprayed than shot)
I recommend the 18' range Sabre red 1.8 ounce bottle of pepper gel.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...rue&ref_=ox_sc_sfl_title_9&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
I did extensive research on it about 6 months ago.
I researched battons, stun guns, and all sorts of home defense.
but stun guns, just tickle some people (even with a 10 million volt version),
just watch you tube.
the affect lasts about 30 seconds at most.
pepper gel lasts 30-45 minutes.
it's a no brainer.
it's not lethal, so no lawsuit.
and it's cheaper than bullets, and permit payment every few years.
(but I do recommend practicing with it).
but that is another example of simply doing research into a cheaper alternative to prepping.
Last edited:
Upvote
0