- Dec 9, 2019
- 8,980
- 3,447
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Stop avoiding and use gospel and epistolic evidence to defend your position. If you don't want to, that's fine, just say so.
HERE'S MY EXAMPLE:
In the last days (acts 2:16-17, 1 Corinthians 10:11, 1 John 2:18, Hebrews 9:26), Jesus's 1st advent resulted in Satan being bound (matthew 12:29) and cast out (John 12:31-32), satan coming to persecute and deceive (John 14:30, 1 thessalonians 2:18, Ephesians 2:2, 2 Corinthians 11:12-15, revelation 2:13, 1 Peter 5:8), the saints overcoming by being born again (ephesians 2:4-7, ephesians 6:11, James 4:7), no one being able to accuse the saints because of Jesus (romans 8:33-34), and satan soon to be crushed (romans 16:20).
Thus I interpret revelation 20, through the lens of the gospel and epistolic narrative and not the other way around.
What gospel and epistolic evidence do you use support your position on the millennium?
Never claimed the day of judgment has already happened. quit with the strawman arguments, and actually address the the issues I bring up.
Where does Jude 1:6 or 2 Peter 2:4 mention the release of demons for a little season prior to judgment in order to support your understanding of revelation 20? I keep asking this, and you keep avoiding.......
Already addressed. Please re read point 3 of post 586.
Again, for the umpteenth time, 2 thessalonians makes no mention of satan being released from the pit. Premils use this same controversial verse to support their position. You using it to defend your position does nothing to add to the conversation. IT'S A CONTROVERSIAL VERSE WITH MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS THAT EACH ESCHATOLOGICAL VIEW USES TO DEFEND THEIR OWN POSITION.
Still waiting for you to demonstrate gospel and epistolic evidence for your position.......
I will take your avoidance as an admission that Full Preterism is unbiblical and that the Jesuit teaching of Steve Hahn that you are espousing has no basis in sound evangelical doctrine. I would advise you to throw The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible in the trash can and start reading the Holy Bible.
Your foolish hermeneutics requiring a mention of Satan little season in the gospels for you to accept it shows how dangerous Hahn's doctrine actually is. It is nonsensical. Also, you made no attempt to address the release of Satan and his minions from the abyss in Rev 9. You have to avoid that because it exposes Hahn's doctrine. 2 Thess 2 shows the removing of the restraint upon the kingdom of darkness.
Upvote
0