10 Lessons for Tea Baggers:

Status
Not open for further replies.

oldbetang

Senior Veteran
Jul 21, 2005
7,361
461
✟24,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Do you really think that the Tea Party movement would even exist if McCain had been elected?

Yes, I do.

As someone who has been a deficit hawk for a long time and who holds his nose to accept that the spending right now is needed to get us through the recession I see the Tea Party for what it is; a hate Obama movement, but I don't think it started that way. Any ties it may have had to spending and taxation have been pushed to the sideline and the deficit hawks that were a part of it have left due to ODS within the movement.

Oh but of course. It's because Obama is black. Right? What else could it be?
2015_eyes_rolling_up.gif


I welcome being proven wrong. Show me one sign that indicates that that either W, Pappa Bush or Reagan were part of the problem.

Reagan has been out of office for over twenty years. The entire debt accrued during his tenure was less than what will be added in one year under Obama. Reagan's spending was to fight and win the Cold War. What is Obama's spending going to do , other than expand the federal government?
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Did you miss THESE?
Surely you're not dismissing the hatred coming from Tea Parties because the other side did it too?

While I'm not condoning the actions of Bush haters, I will point out that Bush had invaded Iraq. Protesting a war is quite different than protesting...uh...what is it the Tea people are protesting again?
 
Upvote 0

oldbetang

Senior Veteran
Jul 21, 2005
7,361
461
✟24,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Do you really think that the current economic woes had nothing to do with the previous administration? Really? Do you also think that Obama would have given these companies and banks loads of money if they were not failing due to Bush's economic policies?

The previous administration shares some of the blame, yes. However, it was the action taking as the administration was nearing its end. That administration no longer exists. Obama is the president. He not only supported the late action of the Bush administration, but he has embraced it and ran with it.

Before long you will be blaming FDR for the Great Depression.
He is certainly to blame for its duration.
 
Upvote 0

Gawron

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2008
3,152
473
✟5,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Posted by aisey Day:

1. “Yes, it is a tax cut not a tax raise.”

First, thanks for re-posting my entire commentary. But you can make this claim all you want, it doesn’t make it true.

Obama's 95% Illusion

It depends on what the meaning of 'tax cut' is.

Quote:

“For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase "tax credit." Mr. Obama is proposing to create or expand no fewer than seven such credits for individuals:”

“Here's the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be "refundable," which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer -- a federal check -- from taxpayers to non taxpayers. Once upon a time we called this "welfare," or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a "Demogrant." Mr. Obama's genius is to call it a tax cut.”

“There's another catch: Because Mr. Obama's tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge "marginal" tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned. As the nearby chart illustrates, the marginal rate for millions of low- and middle-income workers would spike as they earn more income.”

End Quote. Link: Obama's 95% Illusion - WSJ.com

Under the Obama tax credit program, people will receive some amount of money, averaging from 7 to 10 dollars a week. However…….

INSIDE WASHINGTON: Rude surprise awaits taxpayers

Quote:

Millions of Americans enjoying their small windfall from President Barack Obama's "Making Work Pay" tax credit are in for an unpleasant surprise next spring.

The government is going to want some of that money back.

The tax credit is supposed to provide up to $400 to individuals and $800 to married couples as part of the massive economic recovery package enacted in February. Most workers started receiving the credit through small increases in their paychecks in the past month.

But new tax withholding tables issued by the IRS could cause millions of taxpayers to get hundreds of dollars more than they are entitled to under the credit, money that will have to be repaid at tax time.

End Quote. Link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...cle=1&catnum=3

The government giveth, the government taketh away. Or in other words:

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others." Ayn Rand

2. “So that's another yes, the stimulus is working. Furthermore, indicator say that the recession is over.”

Bernanke said the recession was “very likely over.” But I understand how that would be good enough for you, especially given the propensity for the Obots to discount what is right before their eyes.

Bernanke says recession ‘very likely over’

Quote:

“Bernanke said the economy likely is growing now, but he warned that won’t be sufficient to prevent the unemployment rate, now at a 26-year high of 9.7 percent, from rising.”

“From a technical perspective, the recession is very likely over at this point,” Bernanke said in responding to questions at the Brookings Institution. “It’s still going to feel like a very weak economy for some time because many people will still find that their job security and their employment status is not what they wish it was.”

End Quote. Link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32858855...my_in_turmoil/

So, “technically”, the recession is “likely” over………YEA!! But if the recession is over, why is the discount rate at .5%, and the fed fund rate at .25%?

As for the stimulus:

U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus

Quote:

“But there's little agreement about which programs are having the biggest impact. Some economists argue that efforts such as the Federal Reserve's aggressive buying of Treasury debt and mortgage-backed securities, as well as government efforts to shore up banks, are providing a bigger boost than the administration's $787 billion stimulus package.”

“Dave Anderson, chief financial officer of Honeywell International Inc., said the stimulus package actually froze business activity at first as firms tried to figure out how they could benefit from the government spending. The $787 billion package "created actually a slowdown in order activity in terms of the flow that we would normally have anticipated," Mr. Anderson said at a conference sponsored by Morgan Stanley. "We anticipate that that's going to actually pick up in the second half of the year. I think it's not unreasonable to see several hundred million dollars of orders."

"I don't think the stimulus was necessarily as effective as people claimed it to be or claim it will be," said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.”

“Stuart Hoffman, chief U.S. economist for PNC Financial Services Group, said the stimulus package "caused this bit of a concentrated burst [that] probably will exaggerate the pace of economic growth," since some areas, such as auto sales, could fall back to low levels.”

End Quote. Link: U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus - WSJ.com

If you read the article, you find that the majority of the named economist actually quoted give credit to the Fed's monetary stimulus and not to Obama’s stimulus package. In addition, not one of the named economists specifically cites the stimulus as having had any positive effect yet.

3. “Facts are, deficits soared under Reagan's & Bush sr.'s leadership, came down under Clinton's and resoared under Bush jr's.”

Your contention that Reagan is solely to blame for this is false.

4. “Which Obama has continued.”

For my response to this, go here and read post number 19:

http://www.christianforums.com/t7401765-2/

5. “Health care in this country can and does bankrupt people”

So does divorce, the loss of a job, natural disaster, an insane wife spending on the credit cards like mad because she thinks she is “entitled”or a whole host of other circumstances. Do you want the government to regulate and control all of these conditions as well? Your point is meaningless.

6. “Not bankrupt and won't be if steps are taken to remedy it. Medicare was fine until Bush's prescription plan.”

Medicare has a finite amount of money available which will run out over a short amount of time. Short of infusing it with more federal funds raised by additional deficit spending, how is it going to be saved? Oh yeah, Obamacare…

And once again the default position of the Obot’s, it is all Bush’s fault.

7. “Well, he's not.”

Did you stick your tongue out at the screen when you wrote this? Typical dodge of the point however.

8. “Hey, the claim of 2,000,000 was made. Don't blame the messenger.”

When the message is to divert and prevent discussion of why those people went to DC to protest to begin with, I will blame the messenger.

9. “Unemployment is not higher than at any other time in history, even in the history of the USA. Read a history book.”

Hmmmm…

U.S. unemployment rate jumps to 26-year high of 9.7%

Quote:

“The U.S. unemployment rate jumped to a 26-year high of 9.7% in August as nonfarm payrolls fell by 216,000, the 20th consecutive monthly decline, the Labor Department estimated Friday.”

“An alternative measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those forced to resort to part-time work rose to 16.8% from 16.3%, marking the highest on record dating back to 1995.”

End Quote. Link: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/une...-97-2009-09-04

And…..

Industrial world's jobless to hit new high

Quote:

“Unemployment in the industrialized world will hit its highest level since World War II next year, surpassing the current peak, as the global economy looks set for only a timid recovery in 2010, an international organization said in a report Wednesday.”

End Quote. Link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32873653...orld_business/

And…….

Real US unemployment rate at 16 pct: Fed official

Quote:

“The real US unemployment rate is 16 percent if persons who have dropped out of the labor pool and those working less than they would like are counted, a Federal Reserve official said Wednesday.

If one considers the people who would like a job but have stopped looking, so called discouraged workers, and those who are working fewer hours than they want, the unemployment rate would move from the official 9.4 percent to 16 percent, said Atlanta Fed Chief Dennis Lockhart.

End Quote. Link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

So maybe not higher than anytime in history, but my point is still valid. The unemployment rate has reached all time highs, here and around the world. Read a newspaper.

10. “Those who enjoy hate-radio.”

Hate-radio being defined as any radio talk show on which the host says anything critical of President Obama in any manner, or says anything with which you disagree with. So much for rationality.

11. “Teabagger is the normal term for member of the Teabag movement.”

Because that is what Keith Olberman or Bill Maher called them, which makes it normal. At least to you.

“What do you call them?”

Americans. You know, people who live in this country, obey the law, pay taxes, and protest within their right to protest?

“Who has used the term "rim-jobber"?”

Joy Juice and Die-happy.

“Who has said the teabaggers are perverts? Mind of the beholder.”

Re-read my post. I said “only a liberal would take an everyday term, assign it a disgusting meaning, and then use it in attempt to claim that someone else is a pervert.”

And this is exactly what they are doing. If someone hears some talking head like Olberman use the term “tea bagger” with that usual snide and arrogantly disdainful smile on his face, and understands what he is trying to imply, they are not the ones with the problem. It is all of the juvenile minded leftist out there who use the term and then snicker at each other because they think they are being clever who have the problem.
 
Upvote 0

oldbetang

Senior Veteran
Jul 21, 2005
7,361
461
✟24,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Surely you're not dismissing the hatred coming from Tea Parties because the other side did it too?

While I'm not condoning the actions of Bush haters, I will point out that Bush had invaded Iraq. Protesting a war is quite different than protesting...

I'm sorry, what? What are you talking about? Tea people did what? What have the Tea people done that compares with the actions of the Bush haters?

uh...what is it the Tea people are protesting again?

Taxes, government spending, Cap and Trade, socialized healthcare, and encroachment on their constitutional rights. To name a few.
 
Upvote 0

oldbetang

Senior Veteran
Jul 21, 2005
7,361
461
✟24,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I seem to recall recessions during the Bush admin that had unemployment of over 7%.

In the last full month that Republicans had control of both the Executive and legislative branches, the unemployment rate was at 4.4%.


Also the average deficit under Bush was over $500B not the $2B you claim.

Wrong again:

GR2009032100104.gif
 
Upvote 0

JoyJuice

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2006
10,838
483
✟20,965.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Others
Lets look into some of these claims.

Posted by Joy Juice:

1. "President Obama Cut Your Taxes"

Here is an interesting article written before the cuts went into effect:

Why Obama’s ‘Tax Cuts’ Won’t Work

“We know that tax cuts are coming—the only question is what kind. Obama advisers have begun outlining a “temporary” $500 per worker tax credit. Aside from being temporary, this Obama policy seems nearly identical to the “Making Work Pay” tax credit he supported during the campaign.”

“However, a refundable income tax credit is still an outlay and not truly a tax cut. Furthermore, the federal government already provides a tax credit to offset the payroll tax for low-income workers. It’s called the earned income tax credit (EITC). As former House Ways and Means Committee chairman Al Ullman said of the EITC in 1975, “we are in effect rebating to the low-income groups below $6,000 most of the payroll tax they have already paid.”

“Finally, while the objective of the tax cuts is to boost consumer demand and rejuvenate the economy, how likely is it that these tax cuts will be temporary? When it becomes clear that an economic recovery has begun, will Democrats really raise taxes on low- and moderate-income Americans? It’s doubtful. Therefore, the true cost of this proposal is likely much greater than the advertised cost, yet the near-term economic benefits are small at best

End Quote. Link: http://www.american.com/archive/2009...-won2019t-work

This from MSNBC, written just a few weeks later.

Obama: Tax cuts will be felt by April 1

Quote:

Obama says his signature "Making Work Pay" tax break will affect 95 percent of working families.

The $400 credit for individuals is to be doled out through the rest of the year. Couples are slated to get up to $800. Most workers are to see about a $13 per week increase in their take-home pay. In 2010, the credit would be about $7.70 a week, if it is spread over the entire year.

End Quote. Link: Obama: Tax cuts will be felt by April 1 - White House- msnbc.com

$7.70 a week. I guess this qualifies as reason to trumpet that Obama gave us all a tax cut.

Point is NOT the opinion of how effective they would be, the point was allowing people to keep more of their money.

So that one, that he did cut taxes is true while the non-sequintor misses the point.

2. “The Stimulus is Working”

You could make this claim if the stimulus made a single dollar. However:

TARP Scorecard: Paybacks Have Yielded Total Return of 10.16%

Quote:

By Stephen Grocer

Critics of the Troubled Asset Relief Program said the government was simply giving away taxpayer funds when it invested in all those financial institutions last fall.

The government insisted the investments would show a profit.

Who was right?

So far, it seems the government was right, according to a report from data provider SNL Financial.

As of this month, 22 banks have paid back TARP and redeemed warrants. Those firms were recipients of $40.6 billion in government money. Including warrants and dividends, government has received $44.7 billion from those banks. The total rate of return to the Treasury for all companies that have repaid TARP funds and redeemed their warrants has been 10.16%, according to SNL data. The warrant repurchases have accounted for a large portion of the returns–7.15%. On an annualized basis, the Treasury’s investment in the 22 banks that have redeemed the preferred shares and warrants yielded 12.74%.

Since last Oct. 13, when the government told nine banks it would be injecting billions of dollars into them, the DJIA has had a total return of 4.82%.

The biggest returns are chalked up from Goldman Sachs Group, Morgan Stanley and American Express, which yielded returns to Uncle Sam of 14.18%, 12.68% and 12.23%, respectively, according to SNL data.

End Quote. Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/08/2...eturn-of-1016/

So maybe the government might turn a profit here. But now the bad news:

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner Defends Planned Reuse of TARP Funds

Treasury Secretary Defends Plan to Reuse Taxpayer Money Repaid to the Gov't to Help Ailing Local Banks

By MATTHEW JAFFe

May 21, 2009

Quote:

Back on Capitol Hill Thursday for his second hearing in two days, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner continued to defend his department's plan to take taxpayer money repaid to the government by bailed-out banks and then use it to help struggling community banks.

On Wednesday, Senate Banking Committee Republicans like Jim DeMint, R-S.C., had expressed concerns that Geithner might use the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program "permanently." The ranking Republican on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services echoed those worries on Thursday.

"Is the TARP going to go on forever?" asked Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., wondering if the recycling of TARP funds could eventually lead to the nationalization of banks.

End Quote. Link: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Polit...7648241&page=1

Apparently the government is going to keep recycling the funds. Was TARP supposed to be a revolving credit line for industrial nationalization?

You're a wee bit confused. The TARP was passed by President Bush, NOT President Obama.


3. “First Ronald Reagan Tripled the National Debt…”

Congress controlled the purse strings. Reagan cut the budget time and again:

Quote:

President Reagan is the only president to have cut the budget of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in one of his terms (a total of 40.1 percent during his second term).

President Reagan is the only president to have cut the budget of the Department of Transportation. He cut it by 10.5 percent during his first term and by 7.5 percent during his second term.

During his first term in office, President Reagan cut the real budget of the Department of Education by 18.6 percent, while President Nixon increased it (that is the education part of what was then the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare) by 19.1 percent. That budget increased by 22.2 percent under Bush 41 and by 38.5 percent under Carter. Our current president has increased it by a whooping 67.6 percent.

Reagan managed to cut the budget of the Department of Commerce by 29 percent in constant dollars during his first term and by 3 percent during his second one. President Clinton by contrast increased the department’s budget by 24 percent in his first term and then by 96.7 percent in his second term.

President Reagan cut the real budget of the Department of Agriculture by 24 percent during his second term in office.

President Reagan never cut the budgets of the departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, or State.

End Quote. Link: AEI - Papers

Funny how currently any deficit spending Obama has engaged in is Bush’s fault, but during the Reagan years it all falls in the lap of the President.

What I was referring to wa the Stimulus Package...something totally different.

Yes he cut SOME budgets of SOME programs just like your source points out, but in totality he ran rampant with deficit spending. There is no denying that.

Another non-sequintor.

4. “...Then George W. Bush Doubled It Again”

Yeah, well, you guys have already gone round and round on this. But at least Bush was trying to fight the war on terror.

Nonsense, that war or the zeal to invade Iraq was desired way before 9/11, they just needed as they themselves put it, "a new Pearl Harbor" to justify it. The Iraq war had not one thing to do with terrorism, and moreover the cost of the war was NOT even included in the budgets to be considered part of the deficits.
5. “Republican States Have the Worst Health Care”

Hyperbole. Health care in this country is the best in the world.

Point missed, read it again. HERE:

statesc_exhibit2.gif


Note the Republican states are on the bottom when it comes to quality of healthcare....just like I said.

6. “Medicare is a Government Program”

Thanks Captain Obvious. Medicare is also bankrupt.

Yes it is obvious, except for the teabaggers on Medicare who don't want Government provided healthcare.

7. “Barack Obama is Not a Muslim”

The American people did not march on DC because they thought Obama was a Muslim. They do not attend Tea Parties because they think Obama is a Muslim. This is a weak attempt to cast dispersion on a group of protestors exercising their right to protest.

Funny that is exactly what Mark Williams a leader of the teabaggers said point blank, "Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug and a racist in chief" is what he said.

8. “Barack Obama was Born in the United States”

So? You are trying to imply that everyone who attends a protest rally believes that Obama wasn't born in the US. Try again.

In that group and groups such as that is where that sentiment lies.

No where else.

9. “70,000 Does Not Equal 2,000,000”

Thank you Captain Obvious. However, your point here is to debate numbers, your objective is to deter debate on why those people went to DC to begin with.

I am all too happy to debate issues, it too bad they really have no issues other then manufactured outrage by shear manipulation.

10. “The Economy Almost Always Does Better Under Democrats”

That remains to be seen. With unemployment higher than at any other time history, I wouldn’t be so quick to jump on the recovery has worked band-wagon. And then there was Jimmy Carter.

LOL, you don't have to wait...for it is historically true:

parties_sp500_nyt.JPG


bush_econ_perform.JPG


11. “Spam email and talk radio is a short sighted source for hysteria.”

Who goes to talk radio looking for hysteria? You post a thread championing TEN lessons for people to consider, but list ELEVEN. I suppose you didn’t include this last one in your count because it makes no sense.

As for you continued juvenile use of terms such as “tea-baggers” and “rim-jobbers”, only a liberal would take an everyday term, assign it a disgusting meaning, and then use it in attempt to claim that someone else is a pervert.

Funny.....I do believe I just backed everyone of my statements up.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
I'm sorry, what? What are you talking about? Tea people did what? What have the Tea people done that compares with the actions of the Bush haters?
You're joking, right? Bush haters carried signs. Tea people carried signs. Both indicate hatred.
What taxes? I'm taking home more because of a tax cut. Are all those tea people smokers?
government spending,
Yeah, right. Only Democrats spend money. :doh:
Cap and Trade,
Reasonable to argue against. Seems rather overstated, however, to march against a proposal that isn't even being debated yet in Congress.
socialized healthcare,
Reasonable people can disagree, but again, it seems overdone (and a bit disingenuous) if healthcare is why these people are marching. What other government provided/assisted programs do they oppose? Were there any "Stop Medicare!" signs?
and encroachment on their constitutional rights.
Loony. Just plain straight from the loony bin. No one's constitutional rights have been encroached upon.

Sorry. From my end, I see hate radio hosts calling for a hatefest, and a bunch of haters taking their marching orders, complete with signs reading, "Thank God for the hate radio hosts!"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
You will never get NVX to admit that, Old B. My sense is that he, along with many others here, have bought into Carter's lie that any and all criticism of Obama is motivated by racism.

Carter needs to shut up and go away.
If you'd like to ask me a question, feel free. If you would, though, please leave my name out of any conversation with another, unless you're commenting on something I have already said. Trying to predict what I will or won't say, together with your "sense" of what I am thinking, is more than a little rude. Thank you for your cooperation. :)

(Carter didn't say "any and all." That is a lie. Those who lie should shut up and go away.)
 
Upvote 0

oldbetang

Senior Veteran
Jul 21, 2005
7,361
461
✟24,987.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You're joking, right?

I assure you that I'm not. Let's see the signs that compare to those in the link that I provided.

What taxes? I'm taking home more because of a tax cut. Are all those tea people smokers?
President Obama's budget proposes $989 billion in new taxes over the course of the next 10 years, starting fiscal year 2011, most of which are tax increases on individuals.
1) On people making more than $250,000.
$338 billion - Bush tax cuts expire
$179 billlion - eliminate itemized deduction
$118 billion - capital gains tax hike

Total: $636 billion/10 years
2) Businesses:
$17 billion - Reinstate Superfund taxes
$24 billion - tax carried-interest as income
$5 billion - codify "economic substance doctrine"
$61 billion - repeal LIFO
$210 billion - international enforcement, reform deferral, other tax reform
$4 billion - information reporting for rental payments
$5.3 billion - excise tax on Gulf of Mexico oil and gas
$3.4 billion - repeal expensing of tangible drilling costs
$62 million - repeal deduction for tertiary injectants
$49 million - repeal passive loss exception for working interests in oil and natural gas properties
$13 billion - repeal manufacturing tax deduction for oil and natural gas companies
$1 billion - increase to 7 years geological and geophysical amortization period for independent producers
$882 million - eliminate advanced earned income tax credit

Total: $353 billion/10 years
Yeah, right. Only Democrats spend money. :doh:
I never said that. :doh:

Reasonable to argue against. Seems rather overstated, however, to march against a proposal that isn't even being debated yet in Congress.
It's on the table.


Reasonable people can disagree, but again, it seems overdone if healthcare is why these people are marching. What other government provided/assisted programs do they oppose? Were there any "Stop Medicare!" signs?
Healthcare is just one of the reasons.

Loony. Just plain straight from the loony bin. No one's constitutional rights have been encroached upon.
I can show you examples of where they have been . However, the larger issue here has to do with the Supreme Court. Kelo stands out. Also,
the Boy Scouts of America and Heller et al were just one vote away from being denied their constitutional rights.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

craigerNY

I bring nothing to the table
Feb 28, 2007
2,429
369
51
Upstate NY
✟56,288.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
It could be due to the fact that until recently, the government spending problem was the only one of the five that existed.

You are forgetting the encroachment on constitutional rights so that would be two. The other three are recently rearing their head though yes. Perhaps since the other two were OK before the teabaggers might drop them from their agenda?
 
Upvote 0

TheCatholic

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2009
752
38
At the Vatican in spirit
✟1,083.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
  1. President Obama Cut Your Taxes
  2. The Stimulus is Working
  3. First Ronald Reagan Tripled the National Debt...
  4. ...Then George W. Bush Doubled It Again
  5. Republican States Have the Worst Health Care
  6. Medicare is a Government Program
  7. Barack Obama is Not a Muslim
  8. Barack Obama was Born in the United States
  9. 70,000 Does Not Equal 2,000,000
  10. The Economy Almost Always Does Better Under Democrats
  11. Spam email and talk radio is a short sighted source for hysteria.

That stuff is misleading. The Congress controls the purse strings, so they - not Reagan - ran up the deficit. The president has no power to spend money on his own

And a Republican governor, Mitt Romney, gave his state universal healthcare.

And the largest post-WWII economic boom at the time happened under Reagan (Republican), right after Carter (Democrat) destroyed the economy.

You are just making false things up. You are not telling the truth
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
I assure you that I'm not. Let's see the signs that compare to those in the link that I provided.
This isn't a contest. Both show hatred.
President Obama's budget proposes $989 billion in new taxes over the course of the next 10 years, starting fiscal year 2011, most of which are tax increases on individuals.
1) On people making more than $250,000.
$338 billion - Bush tax cuts expire
$179 billlion - eliminate itemized deduction
$118 billion - capital gains tax hike

Total: $636 billion/10 years
2) Businesses:
$17 billion - Reinstate Superfund taxes
$24 billion - tax carried-interest as income
$5 billion - codify "economic substance doctrine"
$61 billion - repeal LIFO
$210 billion - international enforcement, reform deferral, other tax reform
$4 billion - information reporting for rental payments
$5.3 billion - excise tax on Gulf of Mexico oil and gas
$3.4 billion - repeal expensing of tangible drilling costs
$62 million - repeal deduction for tertiary injectants
$49 million - repeal passive loss exception for working interests in oil and natural gas properties
$13 billion - repeal manufacturing tax deduction for oil and natural gas companies
$1 billion - increase to 7 years geological and geophysical amortization period for independent producers
$882 million - eliminate advanced earned income tax credit

Total: $353 billion/10 years

According to the top Tea party organizer, "Those are everyday working people out there." Sorry. Your listed tax increases don't apply to everyday working people.
I never said that. :doh:
I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about the tea people being conspicuously absent during the last eight years.

It's on the table.
That's what I said. Did you miss my point?


Healthcare is just one of the reasons.
Where is the outrage against Medicare?

I can show you examples of where they have been .
Please do.
However, the larger issue here has to do with the Supreme Court. Kelo stands out. Also,
the Boy Scouts of America and Heller et al were just one vote away from being denied their constitutional rights.
Oh yeah. All those people are so mad because the Boy Scouts almost lost. Please.​
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
That stuff is misleading. The Congress controls the purse strings, so they - not Reagan - ran up the deficit. The president has no power to spend money on his own

And a Republican governor, Mitt Romney, gave his state universal healthcare.

And the largest post-WWII economic boom at the time happened under Reagan (Republican), right after Carter (Democrat) destroyed the economy.

You are just making false things up. You are not telling the truth
I love how, depending which team one roots for, it's either the Executive or the Legislative that's to blame for success or failure, but never both, and the blame always aligns with one's political ideology. Simply amazing.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.