I read the article and have not been swayed (big shock right?). I did take a quote from the article that I found incorrect
We are called to be ambassadors for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20), representing His kingdom and standards. Ambassadors are not truly at liberty to represent themselves or their own authenticity. Nowhere in the Bible do we see Jesus Christ using foul language, and when we convey His message and character, we must take care not to degrade it by foul talk.
Mt 5:22 -
But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, 'Raca!' shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, 'You fool!' shall be in danger of hell fire.
Christ said the word raca. This was punishable by the council, I would presume because society found the word offensive. He used it with no ill intent. He says also (right after He uses the words Himself) you fool shall be in danger of hell fire. Again, the words passed His sinless lips. How does this reconcile in your minds that the word itself is bad, not the intent of the use? Christ Himself said them to make a point. How can it be the word that is bad if God Himself said them?
We are called to be ambassadors for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20), representing His kingdom and standards. Ambassadors are not truly at liberty to represent themselves or their own authenticity. Nowhere in the Bible do we see Jesus Christ using foul language, and when we convey His message and character, we must take care not to degrade it by foul talk.
Mt 5:22 -
But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, 'Raca!' shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, 'You fool!' shall be in danger of hell fire.
Christ said the word raca. This was punishable by the council, I would presume because society found the word offensive. He used it with no ill intent. He says also (right after He uses the words Himself) you fool shall be in danger of hell fire. Again, the words passed His sinless lips. How does this reconcile in your minds that the word itself is bad, not the intent of the use? Christ Himself said them to make a point. How can it be the word that is bad if God Himself said them?
Upvote
0