You need to actually go and look up some facts. It's not worthwhile trying to even discuss with you.
It may well be worth it, but you appear to lack anything to bring to the table in regards to facts.
Upvote
0
You need to actually go and look up some facts. It's not worthwhile trying to even discuss with you.
I did not see anyone suggest the right to spread disease. Oh I get it, if you choose not to get vaccinations you are automatically spreading diseases. Good one but a little short in the facts department. Not getting vaccinated does not mean you have a disease, oh is that the misconception here. Hey I see well.it works like this if you don't have the disease you cannot spread it to others, and if you do have the disease and the well behaved sheeple around you are vaccinated then you cannot dpread it to them. Any questions? This is actually funny what if I were an anti vaxer not just supportive of them, I feel way worse for them now than I did prior to this because I see the level of hate they are dealing with.
Ah, that's so saddening. Polio damaged a lot of lives. What a massive and incredible innovation is the polio vaccination.
No on the chickenpox and this is what they call evidence based practice, or did until the advent of the varricella vaccine. In regards to the other diseases one is better off not catching them. Chicken pox does kill I guess you could say, I'm not positive but I'd venture to say that it as a result of secondary infection, not positive but even this is in a very small minority, and it occurs mainly in adults because they were not exposed as children. I had a particularly bad episode of chicken pox at age 5, I still have scars from it and I missed about 4 weeks of school, our dic said it was worst he ever saw and I was never in danger of dying.
Claim #1: Chickenpox kids aren't isolated because evidence-based medicine
Fact-Check: True.
True, kids aren't isolated if they have chicken pox. The reason is not "evidence based" in the sense that implies that this is better for the patient or for the environment, but it is simply not feasable to quarantine any child with chicken pox because the incubation time is 14-16 days during which the child exhibits no symptoms and already is contagious!
Claim #2: Chickenpox lethality is due to secondary bacterial infection
Fact-Check: False.
The varicella zoster virus (VZV) causes encephalitis and pneumonia directly due to cytopathic effects. As such, lethality is not due to secondary bacterial infection but due to viral replication and immune response - I fail to see how this would be relevant though.
Claim #3: It is a small minority and mainly in adults
Fact-Check: Inaccurate.
Neonatal VZV-infections have a lethality of 30-35% - that is no "small" minority, but a relatively good proportion of newborn children. While it is true that lethal cases are relatively rare in childhood, the adult form is very dangerous.
In regards to claim #2-False, per the CDC website "Secondary infection with invasive group A streptococci may cause serious illness or death. Encephalitis is an infrequent complication of varicella (estimated 1.8 per 10, 000 cases) and may lead to seizures or coma.
Claim #3-Misleading: Neonatal VZV infections are exceedingly rare but often fatal, the most fatalities occur in those over age 30.
The point I was getting at is why not just give the child the vaccine? That way they can perhaps get immunity without the risk that the chickenpox party can cause.mafwons said:No on the chickenpox and this is what they call evidence based practice, or did until the advent of the varricella vaccine. In regards to the other diseases one is better off not catching them. Chicken pox does kill I guess you could say, I'm not positive but I'd venture to say that it as a result of secondary infection, not positive but even this is in a very small minority, and it occurs mainly in adults because they were not exposed as children. I had a particularly bad episode of chicken pox at age 5, I still have scars from it and I missed about 4 weeks of school, our dic said it was worst he ever saw and I was never in danger of dying.
I have to admit, it is kind of nice to see everyone on a CF thread, regardless of religion, belief, or denomination, all show their basic decency by uniting against someone suggesting something awful.
The point I was getting at is why not just give the child the vaccine? That way they can perhaps get immunity without the risk that the chickenpox party can cause.
The problem has gotten worse in the U.S. since the "autism-vaccine" scare of the recent past. Pockets of whooping cough has even killed a few kids. So unnecessary in this era of history.[ft/QUOTE]
13 in 2012 and yes it is a tragedy, and I risk sounding callous saying this but there is no evidence that better vaccination penetration would have helped (its currentlu estimated to be at 78%). This article has some interesting information.
Whooping Cough Outbreak: CDC Answers Your Questions | The Rundown | PBS NewsHour
Prior to vaccinations, the death rate in infants due to pertussis was quite high. Do you think it is just a coincidence that the massive reduction in deaths due to pertussis coincides with vaccination programs?
Pertussis is still a problem in areas that do not vaccinate. It still kills nearly 300,000 people a year.
Pertussis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And that is just one of the diseases that modern vaccinations cover.
Prior to vaccinations, the death rate in infants due to pertussis was quite high. Do you think it is just a coincidence that the massive reduction in deaths due to pertussis coincides with vaccination programs?
Pertussis is still a problem in areas that do not vaccinate. It still kills nearly 300,000 people a year.
Pertussis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And that is just one of the diseases that modern vaccinations cover.
Any idea what caused that bump in '04?