From where I come from, beating children is forbidden by law. And I am happy to see that we at least agree on the notion that children should be protected by the state, if endangered. We're just differing in our perception of the amount of endangering that requires intervention.
I am not being sarcastic. I'm wondering if people do this with other diseases. Polio is on the increase in some parts of the world. Could it be lack of vaccinations in combination with over exposure.mafwons said:Yes lets be morons because one works all will work. Obviously you must be using sarcasm to make a pointless point.
If parents don't vaccinate their children they should be isolated from other people. In many cases, there has been a resurgence of diseases that were thought to be eradicated because stupid parents read some ridiculous conspiracy website and decided to believe that rather than their pediatrician.
Yeah, my kids have all been vaccinated as have my husband and I and, guess what, none of us have had polio or measles or diphtheria or pertussis. I would personally choose not to mix with those anti-vaxxers or have them anywhere near my kids. If other kids get sick from their kids' illnesses, those parents should be sued for their lack of responsibility.
I am not being sarcastic. I'm wondering if people do this with other diseases. Polio is on the increase in some parts of the world. Could it be lack of vaccinations in combination with over exposure.
Even with chickenpox would not it be better to quarantine a child as opposed to letting that child infect others with full-blown chickenpox?
Ok, yeah the more opinions I see on this the more I realize Amerikans are going to deserve whatever they get. Weather or not those conspiracy websites are correct is in doubt, but no more doubt that the fact that the companies that produce our vaccines, are in it to make a buck. Now in most of the actual cases of contamination Ive read about they don't use the vaccines here but send them to third world nations where they will face no repercussions if people are harmed. I guess thats ok, and we can 100% trust companies that would engage in this type of behavior.
Ok, yeah the more opinions I see on this the more I realize Amerikans are going to deserve whatever they get. Weather or not those conspiracy websites are correct is in doubt, but no more doubt that the fact that the companies that produce our vaccines, are in it to make a buck. Now in most of the actual cases of contamination Ive read about they don't use the vaccines here but send them to third world nations where they will face no repercussions if people are harmed. I guess thats ok, and we can 100% trust companies that would engage in this type of behavior.
* Americans *whether *I've *that's
Why? Is the K somehow significant to you?Thank you for your kind corrections but I'm very certain especially after this thread its Amerikans, probably with no capital.
Why? Is the K somehow significant to you?
LOL - freedom haters.
There is no right to spread disease to others. It's an evil thing to do.
LOL - freedom haters.
There is no right to spread disease to others. It's an evil thing to do.
I did not see anyone suggest the right to spread disease. Oh I get it, if you choose not to get vaccinations you are automatically spreading diseases. Good one but a little short in the facts department. Not getting vaccinated does not mean you have a disease, oh is that the misconception here. Hey I see well.it works like this if you don't have the disease you cannot spread it to others, and if you do have the disease and the well behaved sheeple around you are vaccinated then you cannot dpread it to them. Any questions? This is actually funny what if I were an anti vaxer not just supportive of them, I feel way worse for them now than I did prior to this because I see the level of hate they are dealing with.