Search results

only a guess but I would think that one side thinks that the other side is not holding to the truth which in turn could lead to a false wittness. Something that requires correction. Billy <><

I agree I agree and I also understand the danger involved but if a doctrine is truly the truth then anyone seeking the truth should ultimately be lead back anyway. I guess I would say if one is up for it (solid in their faith) then proceed with caution. Yea it's tuff wading through this sort...

see no danger in accepting this if one chooses. departing othodoxy (whoever determines that) and not being christian (is too me anyway) clearly two different things. thanks for the info Billy <><

I could be wrong but I don't recall scripture saying anything like this. Can you tell us what the other four are? Billy <><

funny, funny, funny Billy <><

Thanks for clairifying Billy <><

I think that maybe questions along these lines would have probably been asked during the cannonization of the OT. I guess at some point someone had to make a decision and from what little I know about the process I believe that it wasn't taken lightly. I too have to ask myself "what would it...

I can agree with every point here. Billy <><

not at all sure about that.

in all truth Jesus taught the same message as the Old Testament prophets - which was 'repent', he taught them same message as john the baptist, which was 'repent' and jesus himself taught, 'repent'. The apostles taught, call on the name of YHVH, which is 'repent and be immersed'. Hope it's...

I agree with Tim I think you may be missapplying this scripture. But on the other hand it seems to me that you've done what you can and that is to sow good seed. Billy <><

So if God&#8217;s grace frees up man long enough for man to decide one way or the other. Aren&#8217;t we still left wondering if God has any influence in that decision? Billy <><

For some “yes” and for some “no” and as you have pointed out the answers aren’t that easy to come by. Seems to me to be a paradox because if the answer is an absolute “yes” we have some problems, such as those that you have pointed out. And if the answer is an absolute “no” we have some problems...

Hit the road Jack and don't you come back no more! Thanks Carey

Quote "Many scientists "believe" the earth is billions of years old. So any age less than that could be called young. For More importantly, do you have any scientific questions about creation and creationism that you need to answer? Or do you have any theological questions that you aren't...

I don’t post on this board very often but I had a friend raise an issue that some of you may be willing to help me out with. Are there any (and I use the word cautiously) serious scientist that believe in a young earth? Thanks Billy <><

I'm with you on this. Billy <><

If in fact the crucifixion and resurrection were in the mthical realm only, I would think that something of such magnitude would lead Paul to clarify such more clearly. Even though it was possibly common in the day, I find it difficult to think that when Paul refers to Jesus, dying on the cross...

Not wishing to get into a discussion about the finer points of the word &#8216;hoax&#8217; but if copyist added and removed stories, taking into account that they had an agenda, then wouldn&#8217;t that be participating or perpetuating a hoax? I haven&#8217;t read Mr. Ehrman but I have read...

I agree, it's hard to believe that so many are following a 2000 year old hoax. Just doesn't make sense. Seems to me most skeptics can only produce some sort of doubt in which to draw conclusions. Billy <><