Search results

This is easy. It is like saying that when you see a snowfall and look (under a microscope) at the wonder and beauty of each snowflake, that there must be an army of angels "painting" the billions of snowflakes in each snowfall. All carefully done so they are all beautiful and unique. What...

Physics determines can or can not. Why is all of this so hard for you? Ice doesn't form in the tropics. This is not because is does or does not want to, it is because this is what physics calls for. Life goes/develops where the physics and chemistry allow it.

That is as dumb a question as asking why clouds would want to form up high where it is cold. You out do yourself.

No, you do not. No, you don't understand. No, evolution just describes the facts as they are. Well, chuckles, you got yourself a problem there. There are a lot of claims in the bible that have been "usurped" by competent humans. This is just one of them. You seem to be fine with the...

Yet with all that, you have a hard time seeing this? What is your position anyway? No, I don't think I have every detail down, but I don't need to. What kind of idiocy is it to imply that everything needs to be know before anything can be said? You are being ridiculous here.

Yes. I am the reference. When I took Chemistry classes in high school and then later Chemistry and Chemical Engineering classes in college and graduate school, we learned the history of the phenomena we were studying. We learned about alchemy and what it entailed, how incantations were a huge...

I do.

Although LoudMouth has been helping out, I will add my own measure to this response. And by the way, LoudMouth is correct in every way. What you don't (perhaps can't?) understand is what the overwhelming belief was prior to the Scientific method. To quote Sagan, it was a "Demon Haunted...

NO. Not even close. This is fractally wrong.

Really? Do you even understand any of this? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! <sigh> no. Got any evidence for any of this? No? Do you even understand how the existing evidence shows you to be wrong? Of course....

2000 years of "any day now". I have a question for you. how many years should mankind wait until we can declare the second coming a now show? I am looking for a number, not an excuse.

Incredibly uninformed comment. Oh, its OldWiseGuy. Explains a lot.

These people did not excel because they were christian, but inspire of being christian. Nothing they discovered was assisted by their beliefs, and it can be better argued that christianity held them back from greater discoveries. And as others have noticed, you needed to go back pretty far to...

Poe's law in action.

False, obviously. Almost all parts of the knowledge gained from Science disagree with your book. Examples: Chemistry was invented by man to show that unknown phenomena (like fire, water tuning to ice) were not spiritual in order to exclude god from his life. Meteorology was invented by man...

Looking through the posts I see that your definition of slavery is "any species that uses another species for a survival benefit". Under that definition, pretty much every single species on earth is either a slave owner or a slave... and often both at the same time. Darwin ate fruits and...

Let me clarify. The part of you which is immortal and is the evolved result of billions of years of evolution does not decay.

1) It doesn't begin to decay. There are bacteria that are billions of years old. The bacteria in your very own gut once lived inside the guts of dinosaurs. The vast majority of life on this planet is immortal even by your definition. 2) Even you don't decay. Or more precisely, the part of...

There is no such thing as "the initial spark of life". Life is an emergent property, not something external. Homeostasis evolved, it did not "take over". Your line of questioning needs help.

No. Homeostasis is an evolved property which did not require any external intelligence. Current homeostasis in organisms does not require the constant tweaking of an outside intelligence to be maintained. There is no evidence that there is an outside intelligence nor that one is necessary.