Search results

  1. J

    Snowflakes

    That is the smoke screen. They call everything evolution. Everytime we show that evolution is not true, then they just come up with a new definition. That does not change the fact that darwinism was shown to be wrong and neo-darwinism is in the process of being falsified. Even if they want to...
  2. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    Show me what you got. Put up some evidence to back up what you are saying. Remember, you have to show the Bible is not true. I admit that not all christians represent the Bible. So just showing an interpretation wrong, does not falsify the Bible itself. It would be nice if people could learn...
  3. J

    Who's spreading falsehoods?

    So you admit then that the Bible continues to be consistant for 3500 years and that Science after all this time still is still not consistant? The truth is always the truth. You can catch people at a lie, because they are not consistant.
  4. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    We have been over this points again and again and we have shown that none of these are a contradiction. Do a search and bring up some of the old threads. I never said that atheists were going to understand the Bible. In fact our very point is that the Bible is filled with a vast treasure of...
  5. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    The Bible says: "In the Beginning" Science confirms that there was a beginning. Science talks about "Adam" & "Eve" this confirms that there was a common ancestor. I can give you many, many, many examples of where Science confirms that the Bible is true. People search long and people search...
  6. J

    Time and evolution

    You are only judging yourself. You have no way to know me or to judge what I do or what I do not know. Thanks for admiting though, that you know nothing about the subject. Perhaps in time you will learn.
  7. J

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and Darwin

    So Darwin had a influence on communism, but communism did not have a influence on Darwin?
  8. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    There are things we still accept on faith. But our generation has more scientific evidence for the Bible then any generation before us. So we have more reason today to believe the Bible is accurate and true.
  9. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    There is plenty of empirical scientific evidence that shows the Bible is accurate and true. You can not produce ANY empirical scientific evidence to show the Bible is not accurate and a true account of historical people, places and events.
  10. J

    Time and evolution

    I have studied evolution for over 3 years now. You can go back and read the posts. I know more about evolution then 99% of the people out there. I would venture to say that 99% of the people have never heard of founder effect, genetic drifting, the bottleneck effect and so on when it comes to...
  11. J

    Time and evolution

    Created? So evolution begins after creation?
  12. J

    Snowflakes

    I said alike, not alive :)
  13. J

    Snowflakes

    Actually, I was talking about h2o and some people say the body is made up of 70% water. So if water can not evolve, then where did the water come from that we are made up of?
  14. J

    Who Was Adam? A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man by Hugh Ross

    I have some of Hugh Ross books. He is one of the better creationists. The introduction and first chapter of the book is available to read. So we could have a discussion about that if people are interested. For example, in the intro they say: "Personal attacks destroy the possibility for...
  15. J

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and Darwin

    You have answers? For what? It does not matter if you can answer questions or not. The question is what empirical evidence do you have to show that the Bible is not true? Because I have lots and lots and lots of empirical scientific evidence that shows the Bible to be true. Yet you do not seem...
  16. J

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and Darwin

    Oh, sorry about that. I guess I got confused because social evolutoin and the theory of evolution both use the same word: evolution. So does that mean that social evolution should be excluded as a topic on this forum, even though the word Evolution is used in it's description? Or that we should...
  17. J

    Snowflakes

    They tell me that water is made up of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. Which is interesting because hydrogen is so explosive and oxygen fuels a fire. As more hydrogen and oxygen is linked together they begin to form a honey comb six sided shape. When this crystalizes or becomes...
  18. J

    Time and evolution

    What was here before time began, or what was here before evolution began? Evolutionist always say you have to have something to evolved, so where did that something come from?
  19. J

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and Darwin

    Actually, I was looking at the issue in the other direction. That evolutionary theory has been influenced by Marx. Actually what Marx was concerned with was social evolution. Something Darwin did not seem to be as interested in. We know that Marx was very excited about Darwin's book. So Marx...