Search results

If anyone is too lazy to do research, it is you. Time and time again you show you aren't interested in learning anything or ever admitting that you are wrong about anything. At best you are considered a troll and ignored. At worst you waste everyone's time.

I replied to it. You must have ignored it. I'm not surprised.

Then how can the sun be billions of years old if the gases at the center are at even greater pressures?!!? (Have you tried to follow your logic?)

I applaud your effort, but I'm afraid Grady and Jazer both (much like most creationists) are only interested in what they want to hear. They aren't even open to the possibility that they might be wrong, or even know how they might be wrong. Until they are intellectually honest, there's no use...

You know sometimes I think credibility is going to shine through in one of your posts and you'll say something that is reasonable and prudent, and even based in reality. Then you reference Hovind, a global flood that didn't happen, and completely misunderstand what is meant by a mitochondrial...

All I get from you is that you hold science to an impossibly high standard, yet hold religion to none.

So it exists only because you say it exists? If it's not testable or repeatable, how is it distinguishable from fantasy? If you say a spirit has secondary results, then you'll have to rule out all other possible explanations, and still provide a real mechanism of cause. In other words, it...

I guess you never got the memo that there is no evidence for a global flood and there is no evidence for an ark, much less the scenario of all the animals being on an ark during a global flood. Funny how radical evolution to the point of being silly is proposed by you when evolution doesn't...

This is only true if the Earth were a closed system. However, it gets quite a bit of energy from an outside source - the Sun. Therefore it is an open system receiving massive amounts of energy, and so entropy would not increase. In fact, things would get more chaotic and more complex due to more...

We have gone over the Cambrian Explosion many times but it looks like you are the one who hasn't learned anything from the discussion. We showed you that there were transitional fossils in that time frame, and that things didn't immediately show up, and that they still evolved over tens of...

You never did answer my question. Is it possible that you are wrong, and would you know how you'd be shown wrong if the evidence was presented to you? If your answer is no to either of these then you're just wasting your time and ours. If you already know everything, what's the point in trying...

So I guess you should stop accepting gravity since most physicists are unsure of the details. EDIT: In fact the ONLY thing that ever provides answers with 100% confidence is creationism, unfortunately, it's 100% wrong. Science is never 100% sure. Remember, proof is for maths and alcohol. Science...

*facepalm* I'm going to go ahead and report this thread for the wrong forum.

How does this belong in the evolution forums?

We've known since the 1600s that plants get most of their mass from the air. It's called Photosynthesis. It takes CO2 from the air and uses sunlight to break it apart into Carbon and Oxygen. It takes the Carbon and exhales Oxygen. Plants are mostly Carbon. You also aren't aware that breathing...

It's more likely that those who support Evolution are so versed in the subject that they are able to cite and reference the actual opinion of scientists - which is very convergent. If you ask two separate people who know a few things about physics how gravity works and get the same response...

I posted an entire presentation from an accredited college course showing what ancestors gave rise to the CE and you ignored it. I'll repost it: http://www.csun.edu/~dgray/Evol322/Chapter17.pdf If you can't follow it, why don't you email the professor yourself? evol322.html

Judging by the ample mistakes that you make in terms of archaeology, paleontology, and evolutionary biology all the time you have no room to talk about what 'evolutionists' 'believe in'. Why? Because you don't really seem to know what evidence is really out there, that much about evolution, or...

Carl Sagan wasn't a magician. He also was an accomplished scientist who assisted with the Voyager program. I don't know why people like you are against knowledge of any type. How we get to big breakthroughs is by studying small things. Over time, the little things we learn add up and can turn...

So you're not open to the possibility that you're wrong. Then it seems to be a waste of time discussing anything with you.