Search results

This is a video clip of a speach made by LTC White to a graduation class of our infantry soldiers. If you support our troops, you will appreciate this video. http://www.blackfive.net/main/2006/08/us_army_infantr.html HOOAH!

Atheism is the logical conclusion of evolution.

I should be very glad to debate formally, with any evolutionist, as long as the particular subject is one I am familiar with. For instance--If I was shown that the Bible was highly fallible in many other points than I would be wary of trusting it in this issue. I do not think the Bible is...

How can time form fossils? Could you be a bit more specific? What processes form fossils?

If I remember correctly we discussed the issue at some length. Was that ignoring it without consideration? An evolutionist would logically expect to find more species existing as time goes on, not less. The theory starts with a simple single organism and over time the organism is supposed to...

I was not aware that I did this. Could you please give me an example of one specific piece of evidence I have ignored without any hesitation or consideration? Can you show me several things that are only consistent with your theory and which can be explained no other way?

I have to go now, but I hope to be on again tomarrow. I'm looking forward to hearing your answers then.

You say that there is a "large body of evidence" I am asking for one instance among this large body of evidence where the evidence couldn't possibly show something other than what you say it shows. If every item in your large body of evidence could be just as possibly wrong as right, then...

Than as long as there is ambiguity, there is no conclusion. As long as there is a second possible explanation, there is no conclusion.

But you are still relying on your opinion about the evidence being correct, no matter how much evidence you look at. What evidence can you reference that has no "second possibility"?

Likely, but is still could have possiblly been killed as I think it was.

How do you know this is true?

But the same thing could apply to the other evidence. What other evidence can you reference that has no "second possibility"?

I'm curious. How can you prove this to yourself? How do you know you aren't mistaken?

How do you decide which is the most likely? I think mine is, and you think yours is. How do you tell which is the better science, if we are going on opinions of which one is the most likely?

Can you prove to me your conciousnesses exists?

Theoretically.

My point is that since logically the fish could have been killed either by cause A, B, or C, and because there is no "concrete evidence" as to which one it was--- than obviously the only real reason I believe it was killed by C. and not by A, (which is just as much of a possibility) is because I...

Only if you asume that 1.there is no God, and 2. The Torah was written around 500 BC. Both of which I disagree with. God is a being, not something that was invented around 500 B.C. Therefore, being God, He has no point of origin.

But it could, theoretically, been either killed and buried as I think, or as you think?