Search results

Now I feel all left out

Who did that?

And they are wrong. The Kingdom by its nature cannot be filled with evil, those who are evil are not of the Kingdom. The parable says that the KINGDOM IS LIKE LEAVEN.... your interpretation leads to the meaning of the Kingdom of Heaven is like evil. It mentions nowhere "the last day" - you...

And where is anything like this in Revelation? The "technology" required for the "mark of the beast" if it were a physical mark was available in the first century. It is called a tatoo or a brand. What technology is Jesus going to require for the mark of the Lamb? Personally I would not...

Bitwise you are absolutely correct.

Yep no antichrist to be found in that passage. It is serious business to be attributing the work of Christ to the antichrist.

He is Christ. The "anti-christ" is nowhere mentioned in this passage.

Absolutely not.

nt

Actually it is. In Hebrews (don't have the verse handy). Also in general Christian parlance the term is well-used and understood. Further a term does not have to appear in the Bible to be correct - trinity is not a word in the Bible, but we all use it. You are making the error of assuming...

Hello I see I am getting in the middle of a long-standing issue so I hope I don't irk anyone or say something stupid. I actually agree with you. Words have a range of meaning that are not always rigidly literal. If so, then only Jews are true futurists eh? This is the reason I do not call...

No problem JTF I understand. I am sorry if it seemed like I was saying you started this with bad intent or anything like that. If only I didn't have to sleep - I am so tired right now that I look like death warmed over but my job is very busy now too in addition to everything else.

Who knows? Do you continue to go to their threads and make comments and not want to debate? I didn't ask for this thread, and JustMe is aware from the past of my limited time but instead got in a shot. If you leave the threads alone that you don't wish to debate in that is your perogative. I...

Sorry Justme - I have answered all that in spades in my commentary. I have discussed things at length with you in the past and find you a horribly confused morass of doctrine. Thus even if I had time, I likely would not engage you. It is not personal, but practical. You make no sense - and...

JTF, I can only refer you to my commentary - I just do not have the time for an extended debate (being a historicalist doesn't get you out of the pickle I presented) - I don't have enough time to debate on TheologyWeb - I post bits and pieces here as I enjoy this forum and consider Erwin a...

I have not taken a definitive rock solid position on Daniel 12 and you are incorrect about Thessalonians. That is the resurrection. Matthew 24 says nothing about a resurrection. The article you refer to is "Is It A Duck?" located here: http://www.tektonics.org/esch/hythere.html It is being...

I was a dispensationalism until about 1999. I can assure you I do. Is it so unbelievable that someone can understand it and reject it? I have no issue with persons truly understanding my position and rejecting it. I didn't read DeMar until about 2002. Bray I rejected. You do not know...

This has been answered numerous times at TheologyWeb (assuming you are the same poster of the same name) None of them. That was easy. (hint: the Second Coming is NOT the event in that passage) A better question is for you - since the destruction of the Temple then standing is ONE of ALL...

Thank you Imblessed!

Where did Hitch belittle people? Are you suggesting that all ideas are equal and worthy of respect? If you are referring to the "funny hats" comment that was likely a joke. Perhaps Hitch is being more compassionate to those who might be ensnared by this heresy? I know that is my driving...